More output = more thermal efficiency = less heat = less cooling requirements ?turbof1 wrote:It's possible that cooling has to be increased due increased output.
More output = more thermal efficiency = less heat = less cooling requirements ?turbof1 wrote:It's possible that cooling has to be increased due increased output.
Well, the PU has quite a few different heat sources. The MGU-H unfortunaly only captures the heat from exhaust gasses passing through the turbo. There will be more thermal efficiency from there, but it still might be that the ICE requires more cooling, for instance.Juzh wrote:More output = more thermal efficiency = less heat = less cooling requirements ?turbof1 wrote:It's possible that cooling has to be increased due increased output.
Due to overheating.ferkan wrote:https://twitter.com/RoboCoPJ/status/701427773223604224
https://twitter.com/RoboCoPJ/status/701429137878208512
F1analisitecnica info. Basically says TR running pull rod suspension at front and there seem to be big issues with Ferraris PU reliability .
Maybe the Renault engine wasn't as bad initially as someone teams made it look.FrukostScones wrote:told them again incorrect cooling requirements?
Not enough cooling?!ME4ME wrote:How can there be PU reliability issues with 2015 proven unit