How the teams made use of the qualifying session:
Was Lewis running wide in the last corner part of the act as well? There is no doubt that Mercedes have that pace advantage in Q's. First row on the grid was up for grabs and there was no reason why Ferrari shouldn't have gone for a second outing.gandharva wrote:You must have missed last race...giantfan10 wrote: you must mean Mercedes does what they always do and run their qualifying mode in their final run of Q3 like they always do....
i didnt miss last race and just like i said Mercedes ran their qualy mode in Q3 and jumped up by 8 tenths i think it was and ferrari didnt run their second run...gandharva wrote:You must have missed last race...giantfan10 wrote: you must mean Mercedes does what they always do and run their qualifying mode in their final run of Q3 like they always do....
At the time of the first elimination, Hamilton lap should have been discounted for track limits. He should have been eliminated.Sevach wrote:Why did Hamilton lap 1 count?
For all the people that said Q1 and Q2 worked... Ha
What was his S3 on that lap? I'm pretty certain it was actually purple at the time (which strengthens your point).StigOfTheDump wrote:At the time of the first elimination, Hamilton lap should have been discounted for track limits. He should have been eliminated.Sevach wrote:Why did Hamilton lap 1 count?
For all the people that said Q1 and Q2 worked... Ha
The same Hamilton had a lap excluded in Austria 2014 after he went off track and lost time.Phil wrote:In the past, only laps have been disqualified if it is deemed to be advantageous to do so. Hamilton clearly lost time on his excursion, not gained. Which corners are critical to maintain track limits are usually discussed in the briefing prior to the weekend (AFAIK).
Hey I don't like it either (the inconsistency), but these inconsistencies have always existed, regardless of old or new style qualifying.
PS: I didn't dislike the new qualifying half as much as I expected today.
StigOfTheDump wrote:At the time of the first elimination, Hamilton lap should have been discounted for track limits. He should have been eliminated.Sevach wrote:Why did Hamilton lap 1 count?
For all the people that said Q1 and Q2 worked... Ha
Yes, and at Austria, it was already clear to everyone way before qualifying that that particular corner would lead to a disqualifying of that lap if a car left it with all 4 tires. It was quite a topic if you recall. Not the same here or other corners on other tracks where leaving it loses you so much time, there is no point to penalize further.Sevach wrote:The same Hamilton had a lap excluded in Austria 2014 after he went off track and lost time.Phil wrote:In the past, only laps have been disqualified if it is deemed to be advantageous to do so. Hamilton clearly lost time on his excursion, not gained. Which corners are critical to maintain track limits are usually discussed in the briefing prior to the weekend (AFAIK).
Hey I don't like it either (the inconsistency), but these inconsistencies have always existed, regardless of old or new style qualifying.
PS: I didn't dislike the new qualifying half as much as I expected today.
Honestly I'm sick and tired of this FIA/Bernie garbage.Hamilton summoned to stewards over pit lane reversing
Article 28.3 of the regulations states “at no time may a car be reversed in the pit lane under its own power”.dans79 wrote:what is this stupidity.......
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2016/04/02/h ... reversing/Honestly I'm sick and tired of this FIA/Bernie garbage.Hamilton summoned to stewards over pit lane reversing
i get what youre saying i assumed you were calling the rule itself garbage... absolutely nothing will happen to hamilton.. nothing that affects him starting on pole anyway so i think its much ado about nothing.dans79 wrote:It's garbage, because as usual the FIA takes a freaking eternity to do anything. If I didn't know better, I would say they do it on purpose, but they are to inept for that to be true.