2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

giantfan10 wrote:Looks like engine problems for Rosberg, was in "limp home mode" not sure how serious. Maybe driving around and around in testing actually means nothing.
Any word on what it was? I missed fp1 working in the shop.
201 105 104 9 9 7

giantfan10
giantfan10
27
Joined: 27 Nov 2014, 18:05
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

dans79 wrote:
giantfan10 wrote:Looks like engine problems for Rosberg, was in "limp home mode" not sure how serious. Maybe driving around and around in testing actually means nothing.
Any word on what it was? I missed fp1 working in the shop.
it was at the very end of FP1.... i was watching the NBC stream with no commentary so there was no explanation just the radio convo between Rosberg and the pit wall. He was asking if he was allowed to shift because the car was in limp home mode(he was going very slowly) the response from the pit wall was that he was allowed to shift and that it was an engine problem.

User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

Webber2011 wrote:WOW !

2 failed left rear tyres for Massa, the one for Magnussen all within about 20 minutes !

Red Flag.

*Edit*
Pat Symmonds reporting suspected wheel rim failures.

Magnussen possible brake or suspension failure.
He was warned of brake problems shortly before his tyre let go.
Some people were commenting that it could be a serious tyre issure in this GP. Is there any proof of that?

Alonso seems to be OK, as I can see he is driving in the Q2.

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

Looks like Lewis is running a Heavy DF set up, he isn't even in the top 10 on the speed trap times i just saw.
201 105 104 9 9 7

User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

@Vasconia: No Tire issue. Williams had 2 issues with the Rims and Magnussen destroyed his Tire on a Piece of Debris.

For Alonso information check the McLaren Team Thread.
turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

dans79 wrote:Looks like Lewis is running a Heavy DF set up, he isn't even in the top 10 on the speed trap times i just saw.
It doesnt sound quite logic if he wants to overtake cars on Sunday.

On the other hand Kimi is reponting some problems using not so politically correct words. :mrgreen:

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

Vasconia wrote:
dans79 wrote:Looks like Lewis is running a Heavy DF set up, he isn't even in the top 10 on the speed trap times i just saw.
It doesnt sound quite logic if he wants to overtake cars on Sunday.
If he is running extra DF, he will be able to follow closer entering the back strait, and then be able to better utilize DRS.
201 105 104 9 9 7

User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

But the could have problems to overtake cars like the Williams or Force India.

Vettel first, one tenth of a second faster than Nico with the same tyres.

User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

And now Kimi 1.36.986, first!

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

Vasconia wrote:But the could have problems to overtake cars like the Williams or Force India.
He'd gain on both of them in corners, as both those teams run low drag low DF setups.
Last edited by dans79 on 15 Apr 2016, 08:52, edited 1 time in total.
201 105 104 9 9 7

User avatar
F1NAC
169
Joined: 31 Mar 2013, 22:35

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

he could pull something like in 2011 while overtaking Vettel for the lead

User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

dans79 wrote:
Vasconia wrote:But the could have problems to overtake cars like the Williams or Force India.
He'd gain on both of them in corners, as both those teams run low drag low DF setups.
Theory is easy, but reality is another thing. He could have problems than you expect is the top speed of these cars is much better.

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

Vasconia wrote: Theory is easy, but reality is another thing. He could have problems than you expect is the top speed of these cars is much better.
Call it what you will, but its a valid set-up that has been used to good effect on this track before.

I'm shocked Ferrari turned the car up to 11, if they aren't careful they might damage another motor.
201 105 104 9 9 7

f1316
f1316
82
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

Who says they have turned it to 11? I agree that, with the issues they've had, it's unlikely.

Pace only 3 tenths quicker than p2 last year though. I suspect they're getting less pay back from having softer tyres here - they're essentially too soft for a track like this and don't last the full lap (e.g. Kimi's final sector/Vettel's first).

Also both teams probably taking it easy on the PU given potential issues.

Sevach
Sevach
1081
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2016 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, Apr 15 - 17

Post

Kimi hit 323 top speed on his fastest lap.
Vettel 322, Rosberg i think 320 (no idea bout Hamilton).

I think nobody was running full power.