One of the red bulls did 349 in the trap today. That's obviously a big improvement from renault. Wouldn't have been possible in previous years (at this track).FoxHound wrote:Fastest straightline speed means nothing?giantfan10 wrote:[
fastest straight line speeds mean absolutely nothing and having a mercedes engine means absolutely nothing, Williams have all that going for them and race after race they figure out a way to screw it up... they are just pretenders as far as i'm concerned... enough about this though
Yet you base your views on engines entirely on that.
you can pass through pitlane during SCholeindalip wrote:And vettel passing the cars in the pit lane, can you pass under safety car conditions regardless of the other cars speed?
No, that is nothing more than artificial drama to keep the stupidest members of society engaged.jknights wrote: Re the qualifying.
I think that a proposal where there is no qualifying but the grid is the reverse of the last race finish would work well.
It would provide more interest and overtaking.
lol, almost no one agrees with you!Juzh wrote:kvy-vet-rai is a fist lap racing incident imo and vettel should drop it now.
39.8 With the exception of the cases listed under a) to h) below, no driver may overtake another car on the track, including the safety car, until he passes the first safety car line for the first time when the safety car is returning to the pits. However, if the safety car is still deployed at the beginning of the last lap, or is deployed during the last lap, Article 39.15 will apply.holeindalip wrote:And vettel passing the cars in the pit lane, can you pass under safety car conditions regardless of the other cars speed?
Most of it is coming from the chassis. Marko confirmed in SKY DE interview after race. They are able to run low downforce setups and still be competetive in corners. Also the car is a bomb when it comes to braking. Nontheless the Renault PU also improved, but not in peak power, but driveability. Better peak power will come in Canada or maybe earlier (also Markos words).Juzh wrote:One of the red bulls did 349 in the trap today. That's obviously a big improvement from renault. Wouldn't have been possible in previous years (at this track).FoxHound wrote:Fastest straightline speed means nothing?giantfan10 wrote:[
fastest straight line speeds mean absolutely nothing and having a mercedes engine means absolutely nothing, Williams have all that going for them and race after race they figure out a way to screw it up... they are just pretenders as far as i'm concerned... enough about this though
Yet you base your views on engines entirely on that.
Well it's a case of banking on a safety car to make up the time lost from the pit lane or banking on a decent start and avoiding contact. I'd say the latter is more controlled by himself than the other option, unfortunately today a racing incident occurred.Shrieker wrote:It wasn't his fault that Hamilton had to start dead last, but let's face it, he's not good at risk management. Had he started from the pits, he'd be around 10th after the safety car, and with no damage to the car would've finished the race in 2nd easy.
And to his delight, he should be happy with the launch he got. He passed 3 cars within few meters and actually a much better start than Nico's.J0rd4n wrote:Well it's a case of banking on a safety car to make up the time lost from the pit lane or banking on a decent start and avoiding contact. I'd say the latter is more controlled by himself than the other option, unfortunately today a racing incident occurred.Shrieker wrote:It wasn't his fault that Hamilton had to start dead last, but let's face it, he's not good at risk management. Had he started from the pits, he'd be around 10th after the safety car, and with no damage to the car would've finished the race in 2nd easy.