There wasn't any.ripper wrote:I don't understand VET strategy
Indeed. Amazingly mature drive making the tyres last so long with a Kimi in his neck all the time.matt_b wrote:Many records broken today, great drive from Max to make those tyres last without mistake
He would have finished ahead of Ric, even without the tire failure. And with the other two guys not making their tires work to the end it would have been a win. With only staying behind the RedBulls until the end it would have been P3 or P4 for sure....ripper wrote:I don't understand VET strategy, in my opinion they changed too early the Softs. Sigh...
And he never even got passed on the left...zeph wrote:I believe he is the first Dutchie to ever win a GP.
I totally agree. The race was boring as hell. The only exciting part is Max winning it!nokivasara wrote:Now that we had both mercs out the race was still pretty dull because of a track that's almost impossible to overtake on...
Wrong. It was great with lap after lap of will he/won't he. First Kimi on Max, then Dan on Seb. It's not about lots of overtaking, it's about chances to overtake. This thing about needing to see lots of overtaking is why the FIA/FOM keep messing with rules and making a mess of it.nokivasara wrote:Now that we had both mercs out the race was still pretty dull because of a track that's almost impossible to overtake on...
Indeed, for RBR as a team, it was the correct call. But for RIC it was not.turbof1 wrote:We do not know that as Ferrari for sure would have used a different strategy also. Red Bull was spot on to split the strategies. It left Vettel in a "choosing is loosing" situation.zeph wrote:I feel sorry for RIC, though. It should have been his race, if they had put him on the same strategy.
Stopping Vettel just 1 lap after Kimi was one of the dumbest things i've ever seen.Juzh wrote:There wasn't any.ripper wrote:I don't understand VET strategy