Just wait, you'll see in 2 hours lol.RedNEO wrote:
Have you got some gps numbers to back that little statement up buddy?
Just wait, you'll see in 2 hours lol.RedNEO wrote:
Have you got some gps numbers to back that little statement up buddy?
if it looks similar when mclaren use honda pu while Williams and fi use mercedes, then probably its better, since only mclaren is forced to compromise ideal downcorce to compensate lack of power and top speedSevach wrote:Their chassis is Force India/Williams class but they keep claiming it's awesome, of course people will take offense.RedNEO wrote:Nothing you said contradicts what I said. But what I do find irritating is that people keep claiming McLaren said stuff like we have a "super chassis" when clearly they didn't and no McLaren fan thinks it's chassis is better than redbull or Mercedes so what people are doing building strawmen to knock them down again I don't knowgodlameroso wrote:Sector two is just after turn 3, and ends at the exit turn 11, that's all downforce, and grip, Red Bull was fastest in that sector even faster than Mercedes.
Williams doesn't exactly have a "downforce no matter how" car do they?Andres125sx wrote:if it looks similar when mclaren use honda pu while Williams and fi use mercedes, then probably its better, since only mclaren is forced to compromise ideal downcorce to compensate lack of power and top speedSevach wrote:Their chassis is Force India/Williams class but they keep claiming it's awesome, of course people will take offense.RedNEO wrote:
Nothing you said contradicts what I said. But what I do find irritating is that people keep claiming McLaren said stuff like we have a "super chassis" when clearly they didn't and no McLaren fan thinks it's chassis is better than redbull or Mercedes so what people are doing building strawmen to knock them down again I don't know
Andres125sx wrote:if it looks similar when mclaren use honda pu while Williams and fi use mercedes, then probably its better, since only mclaren is forced to compromise ideal downcorce to compensate lack of power and top speedSevach wrote:Their chassis is Force India/Williams class but they keep claiming it's awesome, of course people will take offense.RedNEO wrote:
Nothing you said contradicts what I said. But what I do find irritating is that people keep claiming McLaren said stuff like we have a "super chassis" when clearly they didn't and no McLaren fan thinks it's chassis is better than redbull or Mercedes so what people are doing building strawmen to knock them down again I don't know
- I see chassis championship is still alive and well even though it's the worst time to talk about it (Mercedes vs Red Bull), is it stil seperated from tyres and non-top speed/engine track impact?RedNEO wrote:Have you got some gps numbers to back that little statement up buddy?
You see how electronic sensors change nothing. Likely = more likely for some less for others. It's not like they suddenly started caring about fairness, it's about kerbs, tyres. At least they acknowledged pushing off after 4 years."Any driver who is judged to have left the track three times at these corners (when counted cumulatively) will be shown a black and white flag, one further crossing will result in a report being made to the stewards for not having made every reasonable effort to use the track,"
"As discussed, this is likely to result in a drive-through penalty for any driver concerned."
When they had the same engine they blamed the fuel lol.RedNEO wrote:https://media.giphy.com/media/tjuWJTevYz1Oo/giphy.gifAndres125sx wrote:if it looks similar when mclaren use honda pu while Williams and fi use mercedes, then probably its better, since only mclaren is forced to compromise ideal downcorce to compensate lack of power and top speedSevach wrote:
Their chassis is Force India/Williams class but they keep claiming it's awesome, of course people will take offense.
It appears if Ferrari manage anything better than 5th and 6th they will have done well. Hopefully, for their sake, race pace is slightly stronger.Schuttelberg wrote:I'm beginning to get very worried for Vettel.
I'd say to effectively compare chassis you'd have to remove any performance differentiation from full-throttle acceleration. Braking (from an equal speed) and cornering would therefore need to be compared. Pretty difficult unless you have access to full telemetry, and I don't think anyone outside the FIA have access to the telemetry of more than 1 team.iotar__ wrote:- What does this GPS measure, horsepower, lap time (you don't need GPS for that ), impact of engines on lap times?RedNEO wrote:Have you got some gps numbers to back that little statement up buddy?
I asked a simple question. Not sure what you love about 'how people'... And if you care to trace back since the beginning of this power era formula there have been noises from WITHIN the McLaren team also about how good their chassis is, as well as from their enthusiastic fans of course.RedNEO wrote:It's practice, it could be down to many things. I love how people are eager to down play the chassis at every opportunity. But this car is getting faster, ofcourse the chassis is probably behind Merc and redbull but without the same power the chassis will always be more compromised. Once we are on similar power than we can see who comes out top.justmoi wrote:McLaren 1 sec off Redbull time in sector 2. Does this put an end to their super chassis theory? Just asking