At the beginning of the season the car couldn't touch ferrari and that is now reversed. But I see I touched a nerve here. Let me put it in hopefully less offensive examples as I am not interested in a pissing match on Ves.Andres125sx wrote: So they didn´t use a PU before Spain?
First upgrade, wich was the most important, was in winter
Take a look at Ricciardo results (to keep driver as a constant). Last 6 races of 2015:
15th-15th-10th-5th-11th-6th
And first 6 races of 2016, 6th race was Verstappen debut with victory:
4th-4th-4th-11th-4th-2nd
The improvement is obvious from first race of 2016 season, much before Verstappen debut, so sorry but your favourite driver surely is a great driver, but he can´t do magic and he´s far from the responsible of RBR improvement. RBR turnaround was not Verstappen, it was Renault-TagHeuer
Hamilton wants a car to rotate around the front so he can slide the back around. Schumacher wants a supercritical and agile front end under direction changes. Raikonen wants crisps steering when turning in., so much that he asked for the whole steering rack to be replaced one hour or so from the start of the MON qualifying.
Great drivers know exactly what they want from a car and are able to work out with the engineers how to get it. They discuss with the engineers over a mm of wheelbase change. There are numerous of examples of drivers thinking to get a drive in a championship winning car only to find out that the champion had personalized the car so much that it was unworkable for someone with a different driving style.
I think the synergy between a driver and its engineers is worth at least a second a lap and likely more.