It was solved for the race. They changed the mgu-h.
Is this on every track or over a lap in China? Would have been helpful had they specified.
This is what I found from Wintax Marelli simulation:PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑08 Apr 2017, 19:07What's the full throttle percent for china? And what is the time spent on braking? We can sorta fudge out how many kW on average the MGUH puts out.
74% full throttle per lapIl circuito di Shanghai è piuttosto impegnativo per il 6 cilindri turbo, perché si sta con il piede a tavoletta sul gas per il 74% del giro
Hybrid system can give 2"7 sec per lap and it is worth 12 km/h on top speed. In China MGU-K should recover up to 638 kJ per lap, while MGU-H can recover up to 3.652 KJ per lap (12% more than 2016) for a total of 4.290 KJ per lapErs
Il sistema ibrido può valere un guadagno di 2”7 per giro e può valere un aumento di 12 km/h nella velocità massima. In Cina, la MGU-K in frenata dovrebbe recuperare fino a 638 kJ a tornata, mentre la MGU-H può recuperare fino a 3.652 KJ per giro (12% in più rispetto al 2016) per un totale di 4.290 KJ per giro.
Could the moderator who disapproved my post actually READ what I said? I helped PZ with the numbers by quoting numbers from the McLaren website, which should be the same as ALL THE OTHERS. This is pissing me off..PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑08 Apr 2017, 19:07What's the full throttle percent for china? And what is the time spent on braking? We can sorta fudge out how many kW on average the MGUH puts out.
MGUK amount seems a little low for China.ripper wrote: ↑08 Apr 2017, 20:41This is what I found from Wintax Marelli simulation:PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑08 Apr 2017, 19:07What's the full throttle percent for china? And what is the time spent on braking? We can sorta fudge out how many kW on average the MGUH puts out.
74% full throttle per lapIl circuito di Shanghai è piuttosto impegnativo per il 6 cilindri turbo, perché si sta con il piede a tavoletta sul gas per il 74% del giro
Hybrid system can give 2"7 sec per lap and it is worth 12 km/h on top speed. In China MGU-K should recover up to 638 kJ per lap, while MGU-H can recover up to 3.652 KJ per lap (12% more than 2016) for a total of 4.290 KJ per lapErs
Il sistema ibrido può valere un guadagno di 2”7 per giro e può valere un aumento di 12 km/h nella velocità massima. In Cina, la MGU-K in frenata dovrebbe recuperare fino a 638 kJ a tornata, mentre la MGU-H può recuperare fino a 3.652 KJ per giro (12% in più rispetto al 2016) per un totale di 4.290 KJ per giro.
https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/gp-de ... relli+cina
With jet ignition the combustion starts out near the liner and burns towards the centre, depending on spray pattern of jets the jets radius of 30mm or so, the time to HR10 is same as SI, the lean rate then slowing combustion. Identifying start of combustion using pressure sensors is different. Less top land crevice volume holding dense cool gasses with steel pistons.Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑08 Feb 2017, 13:02fwiw I have been assuming that most of the heat flow is still 'SI-traditional' (ie conduction laterally to cylinder walls)
as (I assume) applies in the modern SI engines that have some piston oil-cooling eg by under-crown oil jet or spray
(this eg in road motorcycles allowing thinner crowns and walls etc, and so lighter pistons and more rpm and power)
if most heat flow is by under-crown heat exchange to moving fluid surely crown thickness is trivial compared to other practical issues