Vasconia wrote: ↑05 Jul 2017, 16:24
TAG wrote: ↑05 Jul 2017, 15:48
Vasconia wrote: ↑05 Jul 2017, 12:14
I don´t deny the fact that Mercedes should be ahead but
the difference seen in Baku was exaggerated. Ferrari should be much closer though behind.
Do you mean exaggerated because Ferrari couldn't use their apparent PU steroid additive and so went backwards during the long Baku straights during qualifying? I agree that Austria being a short circuit and lacking the monster straights of Baku is going to have less of a gap to whatever time Mercedes puts up there, but that would apply to everyone not just Ferrari.
It will be interesting to see if the expected PU update for Silverstone can solve this problem. But firstly let´s see if Austria confirms that Ferrari suffers that much form this ban.
Its amazing to me how suddenly in a few weeks time mercedes has suddenly been cleared by the general public in the oil burning accusation game and its now Ferrari who are guilty.
Funny how Horner is the chief accuser in both instances.
Who is he going to accuse next Force india?
So mercedes denied burning oil and its accepted, Ferrari denies burning oil and its rejected...hmmm i wonder why?
Baku is being held up as evidence that Ferrari must have stopped burning oil...does Vettel using an old detuned Pu have anything to do with the deficit in qualifying on a power track no less?
Kimi of course is the poster child for underachievement so his performance has been rejected.