2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

zeph wrote:
19 Jul 2017, 21:38
diffuser wrote:
19 Jul 2017, 20:44
Have you forgotten Max's 4 consecutive retirements?

I count three? Canada = electrical, Azerbaijan = oil pressure, Austria = collision damage

Seriously, that Renault PU is not as bad as some make it out to be. Surely, nowhere near Merc, but not that far behind Ferrari.
Err no, they are far from Ferrari too.

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Vasconia wrote:
20 Jul 2017, 09:15
zeph wrote:
19 Jul 2017, 21:38
diffuser wrote:
19 Jul 2017, 20:44
Have you forgotten Max's 4 consecutive retirements?

I count three? Canada = electrical, Azerbaijan = oil pressure, Austria = collision damage

Seriously, that Renault PU is not as bad as some make it out to be. Surely, nowhere near Merc, but not that far behind Ferrari.
Err no, they are far from Ferrari too.
If they´d be far from Ferrari, Ricciardo wouldn´t be passing Mercedes powered cars in Baku as he did

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

TAG wrote:
19 Jul 2017, 14:46
Thunders wrote:
19 Jul 2017, 14:11
@ the Interview with Zak: If you want to take some positives out of it the McLaren Chassis and Aero Team frighten Merc and Ferrari. :twisted:
This would be funny if McLaren hadn't gotten rid of the Mercedes PU deal at the beginning of this new regulation era. I'm not sure if Zak doesn't know that or if perhaps he's doing all he can to keep up spirits. Regardless, you can't sell now the idea that they'd be winners if only they had the Merc PU, when the rationale for getting rid of the Merc PU was due to the fact they felt they'd never be able to get on par with the works teams.

Honda is the path forward.
I don´t read that statement as if he´s saying with a Mercedes PU they´d be winning. I take it as a praise to his chassis and aero teams who are so good both Ferrari and Mercedes are afraid to provide their PUs to McLaren just in case their car is better and they beat them with their own PU :wink:

BosF1
BosF1
18
Joined: 19 Dec 2016, 10:27
Location: Netherlands

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

https://twitter.com/pirellisport/status ... 4950370304 Promising test for McLa.. ehm Pirelli I mean :D

All kidding aside, even though you are not allowed to bring new parts to this test, I reckon the laps will help Honda a lot in finetuning the mapping of the engine. For comparison, the Magny-Cours circuit is comparable in length to the Montreal circuit and during the Canadian Grand Prix Alonso managed to drive 134 laps and Vandoorne 151 laps in total during the whole weekend. Vandoorne now managed to do 252 laps in this test. I'm sure Sakura has been watching with interest.

damager21
damager21
17
Joined: 04 Jan 2015, 09:35

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

It will be even more worthwhile and positive if both yesterday and today same engine was used in the car without any mechanical issue. Unfortunately we will never know unless team comes up with an official statement / press release

User avatar
diffuser
237
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

I bet this was one of the reason of getting that SPec 3 in that car so they could also run it at these tests.

Manoah2u
Manoah2u
61
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 14:07

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

wouldn't they be free to use a completely different engine that is not part of the homologized mandate, hence no penalty? it's not an official race weekend, right?
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"

BosF1
BosF1
18
Joined: 19 Dec 2016, 10:27
Location: Netherlands

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Manoah2u wrote:
20 Jul 2017, 20:52
wouldn't they be free to use a completely different engine that is not part of the homologized mandate, hence no penalty? it's not an official race weekend, right?
I don't know if that is an official rule. However, I think the FIA would only a new PU of the most recent specification, not a different specification.

Chicane
Chicane
14
Joined: 26 Jan 2016, 11:21

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

They can run any spec they have already introduced and not those they haven't. In a nutshell Spec 2 or Spec 3. The important thing people are overlooking is that they Honda introduced a reliability fix for MGU-H at Silverstone and now in these two days they must have got solid data about that fix.
Quickshifter

User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Andres125sx wrote:
20 Jul 2017, 17:24
Vasconia wrote:
20 Jul 2017, 09:15
zeph wrote:
19 Jul 2017, 21:38



I count three? Canada = electrical, Azerbaijan = oil pressure, Austria = collision damage

Seriously, that Renault PU is not as bad as some make it out to be. Surely, nowhere near Merc, but not that far behind Ferrari.
Err no, they are far from Ferrari too.
If they´d be far from Ferrari, Ricciardo wouldn´t be passing Mercedes powered cars in Baku as he did
Rb has a great chasis, though not as good as expected, and they are improving it almost in every race. The also have a great race pace but if we talk about peak power Renault is still behind.

zeph
zeph
1
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 11:54
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Joe Saward also speculates about the possibility of McLaren-Renault, and Honda doing a deal with STR.
The major chat in F1 circles at the moment is all about engines and it is getting interesting. Sauber seemed to have the basis of a deal with Honda (it was announced by Honda and they tend not to be silly) but the word is that in order to get Frédéric Vasseur Sauber has had to agree to switch engines.
He suggests that Sauber may have to stick with Ferrari for another year.

And then
This means that McLaren’s only choice is to stay with Honda, or switch to Renault. No-one wants to see Honda kicked out of F1, least of all Honda, and the word is that the Japanese firm may do a deal with Toro Rosso (or perhaps even buy the team) so that they can remain in F1 until they can get the engines up to speed. Red Bull needs only insert a clause in any Toro Rosso deal saying that Red Bull Racing can have the units if they become competitive and Red Bull’s engine problems would be solved. It is a big if, but it is better than drifting on as is now happening. I have heard that there is still no real contract between Red Bull and Renault because of discussions over oil companies and so on, but going straight to Honda would be a bit radical so letting Toro Rosso take the pain, or selling the team (which Red Bull has wanted to do for a while) makes sense. That would mean McLaren with Renault engines, which would be just about OK, even if it would be a bit of a risk for the Renault team. Still, they are getting beaten at the moment by Red Bull, and sometimes Toro Rosso, so clearly they need to improve. Would a McLaren-Renault be sufficient to keep Fernando Alonso? Does he have any other real choices?
RedBull selling STR to Honda? Wow, that would be something. But even if Honda simply supplies them, watch RBR snap up those PU's the minute they become competitive. :D

About McLaren:
Has McLaren finally decided to split with Honda? Who can say? But it is fare to say that the team has given the Japanese firm plenty of chances to improve. I would guess that there are two design teams busy in Woking, one for one engine, the other for the other. A decision must come back September. Going to Renault is not a great option for Woking, but it would be better than where the team is now and my feeling is that in 2021 the team will have its own engines . McLaren is already making its own road car power units and it is only logical to go down this path in the future. That will add to the value as and when there is a McLaren IPO is 2022 or 2023.
I've been wrong before, but I don't see McLaren making their own PU's. Road cars is one thing, F1 is a whole different hog altogether. But Renault as an interim solution does sound plausible to me. Just to hold them over and at least score points regularly, perhaps even podium finishes and the occasional victory.

https://joesaward.wordpress.com/2017/07 ... -of-dover/

User avatar
etusch
131
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 23:09
Location: Turkey

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

I would like to see RBR and McLaren run Honda PU at the same time to compare car performance and PU performance.
Last edited by etusch on 21 Jul 2017, 10:42, edited 1 time in total.

Manoah2u
Manoah2u
61
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 14:07

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

etusch wrote:
21 Jul 2017, 09:54
I would like to RBR and McLaren run Honda PU at the same time to compare car performance and PU performance.
i would like to see that with Ferrari and Mercedes too, and Renault.
oh wait, no i don't want that at all. thats spec-racing. anything BUT spec racing.
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"

User avatar
Alonso Fan
10
Joined: 06 Apr 2013, 18:21

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

etusch wrote:
21 Jul 2017, 09:54
I would like to see RBR and McLaren run Honda PU at the same time to compare car performance and PU performance.
Rbr would probably still be faster with McLaren close behind
SHR Modding
Youtube
Twitter
Discord

Sound Developer for Reiza Studios
Sound Modder for Assetto Corsa

User avatar
diffuser
237
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Alonso Fan wrote:
21 Jul 2017, 12:14
etusch wrote:
21 Jul 2017, 09:54
I would like to see RBR and McLaren run Honda PU at the same time to compare car performance and PU performance.
Rbr would probably still be faster with McLaren close behind
Crystal Ball racing ...I like that ?

If McLaren mess this up and allow Honda to buy Toro Rosso. If would be a complete disaster for them. Renault has been, what seems like forever, behind in PUs. They really have no excuse, they never left F1. Even in the naturally aspirated V8 era they had a weaker PU. It was only close because they Froze everyone PUs and allowed Renault to catch up. Just the fact that RBR would be willing to hedge their bets with Honda gives you and idea of how "not so great" it is with Renault.