He has a bad Q3. That was the only off part of the weekendf1universe wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 16:56What's up with Hamilton and this "off" weekends?. Kudos to him for giving the position back to Bottas.
He has a bad Q3. That was the only off part of the weekendf1universe wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 16:56What's up with Hamilton and this "off" weekends?. Kudos to him for giving the position back to Bottas.
I have a different view. On RTL they had both on screen and at the end, Lauda said something along the line "he now agrees with Toto". Toto was very outspoken about keeping the deal of the bargin (to let Bottas back into 3rd), so I am fairly confident Lauda was arguing to NOT swap the positions back.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 17:40Lauda probably gave instructions without Toto's permission. By protocol only Toto can give high level decisions outside of the strategist's prescription.Treble wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 17:25For all the people talking about Ferrari and Mercedes different strategies. It's been 10 years since the last Ferrari win. Mercedes has been winning for many years now. This year finally with an incredible job on the chassis Ferrari managed to close the gap without a super Power Unit. It's pretty obvious that Ferrari at this point of the championship with Raikkonen with only the half of the points of Vettel decide to back their strongest driver.
In the Merc Box, at the end, i saw TOTO WOLF very angry against Lauda. Anyone knows the reason?
I don't think Vettel would have asked for it in the first place. Did Vettel ask to be let by in China?
It doesn't matter Vettel asks or not and he had asked several times in the previous years. Ferrari would always find a way to put Vettel in front of the Raikkonnen like we saw in Monaco
Can you tell me which races those are?ismail1991 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 17:57It doesn't matter Vettel asks or not and he had asked several times in the previous years. Ferrari would always find a way to put Vettel in front of the Raikkonnen like we saw in Monaco
I wasn't, and I am a big supporter of Dan (-> I'm Australian too). But hey, the Kid (Max) has balls and I love him for that ruthlessness. He is making F1 entertaining and I think the sport is better for it. If all were driving like Button and Kimi (IMO sone of the least aggressive drivers outthere), it just would be kind of boring.jz11 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 15:23was this a sarcastic comment? because so far he pretty much single handedly ruined the race for me at least, and the team, just by being himself...
and it is not like 1st lap incidents involving him are something new, he had enough time to mature and not make these screw ups, especially involving his team mate
2016 Azebeijan comes to my mind now. In addition, at monaco Ferrari swapped them in the pits.LionKing wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 18:03Can you tell me which races those are?ismail1991 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 17:57It doesn't matter Vettel asks or not and he had asked several times in the previous years. Ferrari would always find a way to put Vettel in front of the Raikkonnen like we saw in Monaco
well, if you would stop lying to your self you will find that at Monaco, Kimmi at no point could match the lap times of Seb before or after the pit stops, so actually nothing was "swapped" in the pits, it all happened with lap times.ismail1991 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 18:162016 Azebeijan comes to my mind now. In addition, at monaco Ferrari swapped them in the pits.LionKing wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 18:03Can you tell me which races those are?ismail1991 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 17:57It doesn't matter Vettel asks or not and he had asked several times in the previous years. Ferrari would always find a way to put Vettel in front of the Raikkonnen like we saw in Monaco
Vettel was quite in front of Kimi at Baku. Though he stayed out without pitting a lot longer than him. He came up be behind Kimi after the pit stop being undercut for so many laps. Then he caught Kimi on fresh rubber. I really don't remember Vettel asking for anything there. Kimi would have been DRSed at the end of start finish anyway...Chene_Mostert wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 18:20well, if you would stop lying to your self you will find that at Monaco, Kimmi at no point could match the lap times of Seb before or after the pit stops, so actually nothing was "swapped" in the pits, it all happened with lap times.ismail1991 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 18:162016 Azebeijan comes to my mind now. In addition, at monaco Ferrari swapped them in the pits.
Okay.
Okay, but I am entitled to say my opinion. Saying to someone else stop lying is not nice @Chene_Mostert. everybody knows what happens in Ferrari
Maybe. Personally I think Vettel's pace was sufficient that Kimi couldn't get close enough on a circuit like this - not without a mistake.Phil wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 17:27That's just it though. You can tell me what you want, but IMO it was quite clear to me that Kimi wasn't allowed to pass Vettel. He was on the radio, practically begging the team to let him by and yet it felt like they were letting him out to dry for the Mercedes just to defend the win for Vettel at all costs. Given the issue that Vettel was nursing to the finish line, Kimi could have been way more aggressive and put on more pressure, yet we saw none of that.f1316 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 16:28Fairly odd reaction on here. If you race the entire distance with a steering issue and maintain a pace good enough to keep your rivals behind you (and yes, Alonso showed that if your pace delta is big enough you can overtake - even with a slower engine) then you've done a pretty good job and deserve a real sense of satisfaction.