OK, produce me the list from those 91 wins where he was handed the win by his teammate. I bet you will have trouble naming more than three.
OK, produce me the list from those 91 wins where he was handed the win by his teammate. I bet you will have trouble naming more than three.
One would be considered one too many when not wearing the rose colored glasses.
Or put another way...godlameroso wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 17:15Alonso is losing .7 in sector 2, that's the chassis sector, .6 in sector 1, and .6 in sector 3.
and one would be considered one too little if you remove ur hatred filled glasses.
By you, for example? The fact here is THE great amount of "clean" victories.
Nice analysis, thanks for the data...stevesingo wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 17:54Or put another way...godlameroso wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 17:15Alonso is losing .7 in sector 2, that's the chassis sector, .6 in sector 1, and .6 in sector 3.
in sector 1 only Vandoorne, the Renaults and the Saubers are slower. Ranked 14th (Of 19 runners) overall.
in sector 2 Alonso is faster Force India's, Torro Rossos, Hass, Saubers and Ricciado with his low drag set up. Ranked 9th overall, just a 10th shy of the Renaults
in sector 3 Alonso is faster than only the Saubers and Kvyat. Ranked 16th overall.
Relatively better in the chassis sector, but I suspect that if they add any more downforce, they will be sitting ducks on the straights.
I was going to mention it but you have already done that ! Micheal gave away Irvine a victory in 1999 long before Austria 2001...siskue2005 wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 18:00and one would be considered one too little if you remove ur hatred filled glasses.
and how many races did he give back to Rubens for that ONE race in Austria 2002?
and also how many races did he give to Irvine?
I guess he would have got 100 wins if some of it played into his hands
I doubt it. Kimi takes a lift; while not a huge one, that's quite a lift still.
Indianapolis 2002LionKing wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 18:59I was going to mention it but you have already done that ! Micheal gave away Irvine a victory in 1999 long before Austria 2001...siskue2005 wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 18:00and one would be considered one too little if you remove ur hatred filled glasses.
and how many races did he give back to Rubens for that ONE race in Austria 2002?
and also how many races did he give to Irvine?
I guess he would have got 100 wins if some of it played into his hands
I find it amazing how people keep assuming TOs are unfair... Any reason any team should let one of his drivers ruin the chances for the WDC of his team mate?
Thanks for the detail.godlameroso wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 17:15Alonso is losing .7 in sector 2, that's the chassis sector, .6 in sector 1, and .6 in sector 3.
If the second option allow you to defend position in the race instead of being fly passed by anyone behind, then the secondgodlameroso wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 22:19Would you rather be 1.4 off in sector 1 & 3, but only off .4 in sector 2, or 1.1 1 & 3 but .9 off in sector 2?
I'm not making any assumptions, I'm asking your opinionAndres125sx wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 22:34If the second option allow you to defend position in the race instead of being fly passed by anyone behind, then the secondgodlameroso wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 22:19Would you rather be 1.4 off in sector 1 & 3, but only off .4 in sector 2, or 1.1 1 & 3 but .9 off in sector 2?
But you´re making too many assumptions, I guess Mclaren know how to set up a F1 car much better than any of us
When a top team, or any top profesional in any area, make something I don´t understand, I don´t assume they don´t know what they´re doing, I think I´m missing something and try to guess what´s the reason wich motivated their decision.