In F1 or throughout his career?
With 0 experience in F1 I think his performance has been good so far.
Same went for DannyRic, Max Verstappen, Carlos Sainz and they all are absolute GODS compared to Gasly.
Not all the drivers can deliver some great performances from the very first races, only a very few ones have done it in fact. Gasly was close Sainz in the first qualy and not so far in the second. His race pace hasn´t been that bad in two races where TR hasn´t worked well at all. Its much easier if you begin your F1 career with a top team and a great car. I think he has done a decent job so far so it would be fair to give him more time. Now it will be interesting to see how he performs in comparison to Daniil( I guess he will be back in Austin).Manoah2u wrote: ↑09 Oct 2017, 11:48Same went for DannyRic, Max Verstappen, Carlos Sainz and they all are absolute GODS compared to Gasly.
Godlameroso is right, Gasly has been all but impressive.
Sure give it time would be smart, but that doesn't take away that from seeing him spooned in midseason/endseason, one would have expected more from him if such a decision is made instead of just 'spooning' him in next year.
Then again, i must admit, we sometimes are mistaken on how difficult it can be. I remember Massa's incident and his replacements. I remember Luca Badoer stepping in. Not that he ever was on any 'A-star' driver capacities or anything really special, but he struggled so much it was embarassing, and it was hardly his fault. Fisichella, driving for Force India all year long then took over and didn't really do much better. A bit, but not much. Kimi was on a whole other level though. Neither Badoer or Fisichella came even remotely close to Massa or Raikkonen's performances,
despite Fisichella being far from a bad driver, and again, Badoer wasn't the worst either. Neither of both were 'Ericsson' or 'Palmer' cr*p, but in that Ferrari, well, they were exactly that somehow.
So agreed, wait and see but i do wonder whether NOT stepping in in Austin is the wisest decision for his 'development' path. Then again, his F1 experience now might do him a lot of good for the SuperFormula.
We lost the benchmark for Gasly’s race performance when Sainz span but factually he did beat Sainz and didn’t make the kind of first lap spin you’d expect more from the rookie than the guy moving onwards and upwards.Vasconia wrote: ↑09 Oct 2017, 12:48Not all the drivers can deliver some great performances from the very first races, only a very few ones have done it in fact. Gasly was close Sainz in the first qualy and not so far in the second. His race pace hasn´t been that bad in two races where TR hasn´t worked well at all. Its much easier if you begin your F1 career with a top team and a great car. I think he has done a decent job so far so it would be fair to give him more time. Now it will be interesting to see how he performs in comparison to Daniil( I guess he will be back in Austin).Manoah2u wrote: ↑09 Oct 2017, 11:48Same went for DannyRic, Max Verstappen, Carlos Sainz and they all are absolute GODS compared to Gasly.
Godlameroso is right, Gasly has been all but impressive.
Sure give it time would be smart, but that doesn't take away that from seeing him spooned in midseason/endseason, one would have expected more from him if such a decision is made instead of just 'spooning' him in next year.
Then again, i must admit, we sometimes are mistaken on how difficult it can be. I remember Massa's incident and his replacements. I remember Luca Badoer stepping in. Not that he ever was on any 'A-star' driver capacities or anything really special, but he struggled so much it was embarassing, and it was hardly his fault. Fisichella, driving for Force India all year long then took over and didn't really do much better. A bit, but not much. Kimi was on a whole other level though. Neither Badoer or Fisichella came even remotely close to Massa or Raikkonen's performances,
despite Fisichella being far from a bad driver, and again, Badoer wasn't the worst either. Neither of both were 'Ericsson' or 'Palmer' cr*p, but in that Ferrari, well, they were exactly that somehow.
So agreed, wait and see but i do wonder whether NOT stepping in in Austin is the wisest decision for his 'development' path. Then again, his F1 experience now might do him a lot of good for the SuperFormula.
Fisichella went directly from a 2nd place finish at Force India to trailing round outside the points in the Ferrari, the Ferrari was fast but had a very narrow performance window.Manoah2u wrote: ↑09 Oct 2017, 11:48Then again, i must admit, we sometimes are mistaken on how difficult it can be. I remember Massa's incident and his replacements. I remember Luca Badoer stepping in. Not that he ever was on any 'A-star' driver capacities or anything really special, but he struggled so much it was embarassing, and it was hardly his fault. Fisichella, driving for Force India all year long then took over and didn't really do much better. A bit, but not much. Kimi was on a whole other level though. Neither Badoer or Fisichella came even remotely close to Massa or Raikkonen's performances,
despite Fisichella being far from a bad driver, and again, Badoer wasn't the worst either. Neither of both were 'Ericsson' or 'Palmer' cr*p, but in that Ferrari, well, they were exactly that somehow.