Having a hole in your hand is still better than having a hand in your hole- meaning better to have all of this sh!t now, than during the season.Phil wrote: ↑27 Feb 2018, 22:29No, it’s called being factual. Most pf us want to see McLaren do well. Sitting in the garage while others are out driving despite less than ideal conditions isnt “according to plan”.
According to plan is what the top 3 have been doing. Being outthere, gathering data, simulations, learning.
Sitting innthe garage because a fault did occur is a perfect example of something NOT going according to plan. If it did, nothing would have failed in the first place.
It doesnt mean they cant recover, but it is what it is.
What the hell it was starting at 2:12?
You are reading far too much into the early days of testing and you seem to have a chip on your shoulder, but alas.McMika98 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2018, 23:00Although we cant read into performance levels due to temperature. It is very interesting that Mclaren are going for early glory runs and not running structured runs to understand the setup. Understand that early issues have not helped but they cant even match Renault atm and the best chassis delusion is unravelling as we speak.
good god, can we take a moment to realise how dispicable and bad this new format is?
Being factual would be trying to access the reasoning behind the lack of running in the 2nd day instead of panicking and looking for someone to blame.Phil wrote: ↑27 Feb 2018, 22:29No, it’s called being factual. Most pf us want to see McLaren do well. Sitting in the garage while others are out driving despite less than ideal conditions isnt “according to plan”.
According to plan is what the top 3 have been doing. Being outthere, gathering data, simulations, learning.
Sitting innthe garage because a fault did occur is a perfect example of something NOT going according to plan. If it did, nothing would have failed in the first place.
It doesnt mean they cant recover, but it is what it is.
This isn't the FOM design this is just an Excel document made by myself, i use a police who looks like the FOM
Nice comment about being factual.. would rate up if i had any points.DFX wrote: ↑27 Feb 2018, 23:24Being factual would be trying to access the reasoning behind the lack of running in the 2nd day instead of panicking and looking for someone to blame.Phil wrote: ↑27 Feb 2018, 22:29No, it’s called being factual. Most pf us want to see McLaren do well. Sitting in the garage while others are out driving despite less than ideal conditions isnt “according to plan”.
According to plan is what the top 3 have been doing. Being outthere, gathering data, simulations, learning.
Sitting innthe garage because a fault did occur is a perfect example of something NOT going according to plan. If it did, nothing would have failed in the first place.
It doesnt mean they cant recover, but it is what it is.
Is not ideal, but this is what pre season tests are for! To find out those kind of issues before the season starts.
OuchGM7 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2018, 23:34This isn't the FOM design this is just an Excel document made by myself, i use a police who looks like the FOM
And it’s not so bad anywayGM7 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2018, 23:34This isn't the FOM design this is just an Excel document made by myself, i use a police who looks like the FOM
Sorry dude but Toro Rosso did 175 laps with the Honda engine today.McHonda wrote: ↑27 Feb 2018, 19:21Yeah,good point.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑27 Feb 2018, 19:19Considering that it's really unlikely for gravel to damage that part of the exhaust, as well as the fact that they most likely had the engine cover off during the night and would've definitely caught any damage done there, I don't think it's related in any way.