Just out of curiosity, does anybody have an idea what kind of advantage cutting the chicane gives in terms of lap time?
Not that it's anything to go by, but McLaren and Ferrari were the only teams in the 17s. Cruising, sandbagging and testing programmes aside, I think it's pretty respectable.
I second that, very positive indeed! Also, Fernando was still able to do 93 laps, after all the time lost during the engine change. Would have been at least 150 if not for that.
Fixed that for you.RonDennis wrote: ↑09 Mar 2018, 15:29Because they use this test for correlation, so that they can make adjustements if something isn't right. It's all about having a good baseline. The car in Melbourne won't be a completely different concept. Just temper your expectations a bit, because they won't be winning any races this year. They just need a good year and if they even finish a race, they have done a good job.marmer wrote: ↑09 Mar 2018, 15:15Or they are bluffing while searching for some sponsor money.Macklaren wrote:The fact that something so serious is recurring and the team are so relaxed about it leads me to believe that they know EXACTLY what the problem is and have a fix for it but for some reason can’t do it on the test car
I don't get this it will be ok by Australia with our new kit on
If they know it's better why didn't they bring that setup. What if they get to Australia and it's not better too late then because they can't go back to this set-up its got proven heat issues and it's not been that quick.
Be as sad for me as you like pal, doesn't change the fact that McLaren are looking like rank amateurs right at the moment.