I was expecting them to be a solid 4th.
So you think Ferrari spent less for engine development?. The fact is no one can know, period. I bet Honda spend the most in last couple years hahaha...
And Toyota won so many championships, having had the biggest budget! Just saying.
That's true.Restomaniac wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 09:05That's fine. TBH however that's the problem with second hand info.LM10 wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 08:57Oh, my apologies then. I actually didn't watch Sky. Just reacted to what was being written here.Restomaniac wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 08:47No they didn't.
They just said that Mercedes was ahead (which they seem to be). They also said it was close between them and RedBull. Hell they even hinted at Ferrari sandbagging and that Mercedes may need to keep an eye on that when Vettel randomly popped in a fastest speed trap time.
- Toyota doesn't compete in '18, just saying. Reason - spending money = not a good example.GPR-A wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 18:04And Toyota won so many championships, having had the biggest budget! Just saying.
https://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/22/f1- ... -the-most/
https://www.racefans.net/2008/09/22/toy ... get-4456m/
Looking at these numbers, I don't really see a domination of Mercedes. The lap times in the long runs among the top 3 teams look quite similar. You can see slightly faster laps of Mercedes, but this is nowhere near a big margin.
Totally agree, but I would also add Williams. They were just a position below Findia the last two years and the two years before they were above them. Furthermore they were even beating Ferrari in 2014 and Red Bull in 2015. They also beat McLaren in every year of the new formula. they also did this making a profit every season, quite an underrated team
I'm also disapointed for Renault.foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 17:30So far for me,
Biggest nice surprise: Haas
Biggest disappointment: Renault.
Several times last year Ferrari looked behind on a Friday and then came in extremely strong in Q3, dropping back slightly vs Mercedes in quali. That was the general pattern of 2017 practice.tranquility2k4 wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 18:39A word of warning for those thinking it may be close at the front (forgetting about rain i'm on about raw speed here if it is dry). Several times last year after Friday practice Red Bull and or Ferrari were ahead of Merc on 1 lap pace and/or on the long runs an then Merc were similar to them or ahead when it came to quali and the race. As it stands everything looks very close from Friday so if that normal pattern emerges I would expect Merc to have quite a bit in hand.
I recall often seeing Merc and RB close on long run times on Friday but then Merc way ahead in the actual race and thinking why didn't that show in the Friday long runs. It's either fuel or engine usage in one way or another.
It's likely that Merc can turn up their engines a lot more compared with RB. Remember Baku last year? Merc were behind in short and long run, by quite a bit and looked average. On Saturday and Sunday they dominated.
The only times the others had a chance last year was when another team looks quite dominant on a specific track or when Merc have a really poor Friday. Neither looks the case here so I think business as usual. If you want to see the real performance look at the average time on the 2nd stint they did in the long runs in Practice 2. Hamilton and Bottas far ahead of competition on the SS and S tyres respectively. They were clearly nursing the US tyres in stint 1 and unleashed potential in stint 2.
What's most surprising is the cars are not any faster than last year, in fact in the long runs especially Merc were quite a bit slower. Either this is because of the track temps or Merc really have their engine on mode 1 out of 10.
I think they may have numbered it as such because they claim that they don't expect DRS to help much passing into 13, but instead to help the driver get closer to help passing into T1. But that seems like nonsense to me as the turbulence from the leading car will disadvantage the following car from 13, 14, 15,and 16 so I don't see much improvement. The new DRS ZONE 3 will help drivers catch up sooner, but I don't see it helping overtaking any.Monster Hesh wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 18:23MotoGP & Dorna need to educate F1 & Liberty Media on how to design on-screen graphics and the wealth of information it should/needs to display. F1 2018 presentation is absolutely shocking.
Can someone explain the DRS counting?
https://www.formula1.com/content/fom-we ... 601701.png
They spend more than double as Ferrari or Renault on the engine by 2015. Just google it. You will find it.foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 17:33How do you even know that?? Why do you think they spend more than Ferrari or RedBull.