The other incidents had room for debate- but not today.
The other incidents had room for debate- but not today.
Thanks both of you guys. I thought my eyes were painted on for a second there.ArcticWolfie wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 17:45Indeed, he even said so himself too many marbles and lost traction:NathanOlder wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 17:04Manoah2u wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 15:23
Apart from that Verstappen was too 'greedy' today, you're blowing things out of proportion.
Verstappens move on Ham was far from brain-dead, it was a phenomenal move but Lewis i'd say actually pulled a really d*ck move on Max which was left completely unattended and quite frankly set a stage.
If you actually have the b*lls to objectively and calmly look at that move of verstappen on Hamilton, then you would have noticed that verstappen was alongside hamilton, when all of a sudden, Hamilton's car made a sudden frisky move to the right, which Max had to evade and sent him off track which then saw Ricciardo pass him.
Hamilton had the line completely under control, and in my opinion, pushed him off track deliberately. there was no braking problems for Lewis, there was no loss of grip, it was a clear signal to Max that he wasn't making it easy on him, in my opinion, a rather ***hole move, especially since Max' front wheels far passed Lewis rear wheels in the corner so Lewis was actually oblidged to leave him space - which he actually totally did not. Apart from all of that,
the outside line was dirty too so there was no grip for Max to respond to Lewis suddenly moving towards him.
even if it wasn't delibarate at all, that doesn't make it a brain-dead move. the only braindead move i saw today
was that of Gasly on Hartley.
.
To me it looked like Max just lost the rear and after saving the car had no choice but to run wide. I will need to see it again, but i thought Lewis left room. Going to the outside of the track at that point was madness with the marbles.
https://www.ziggosport.nl/fragment/5957 ... a-mp4.html
(Dutch interview )
I know I'm impatience, but **** Verstappen's performance today truly hurt. Been a fan of him since he started F1, but his actions today (incl. the remark to Hamilton) were just painful to watch and unneeded
The Dutch reporter asked him why he's so impatient... he didn't know yet, better find out this year.
Mhh Bottas had a good race, but Dotd? He fell back more than 3secs behind Vettel and then "got lucky" by pitting at the right time. Ferrari made a very bad call concerning the timing of the Pitstop and that made Bottas get the pass done.Bill_Kar wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 15:46My driver of the day is definitely Bottas.
Sure, Ricciardo was good no doubt, but I think Bottas will leave with some confidence.
He did a fantastic first stint staying close to Vettel, an incredible outlap, a marvellous overtake on Kimi, and he defended really well against Vettel & more so against Kimi towards the end(maybe not so with Ricciardo, but that was inevitable either way).
And then you wonder, what about Hamilton? I felt he was really lost the whole weekend. He is extremely lucky with how things developed
Indeed.
He says a lot more than just analyzing here:Sierra117 wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 18:46Unfortunately it doesn't look like he'll makr any changes. He admitted his fault in the post-race interview ... and then immediately replied to a follow up question that he doesn't think he needs to calm down or change anything, just needs to "analyse" ... Ok then.
He used lots of filler words like "maybe" but eventually said the same thing; that he doesn't see a need to be less aggressive or whatever. It also doesn't help that these interviewers are putting words in everyone's mouths by saying "nobody wants to see you xyz". They're just reaffirming to him that it's fine, go ahead and be reckless. Anyway, it's done and dusted. On to Baku.ArcticWolfie wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 18:57He says a lot more than just analyzing here:Sierra117 wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 18:46Unfortunately it doesn't look like he'll makr any changes. He admitted his fault in the post-race interview ... and then immediately replied to a follow up question that he doesn't think he needs to calm down or change anything, just needs to "analyse" ... Ok then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUbODoli_ko
No come on, that move, had he pulled it off would have been applauded and praised by everyone - deservedly so. It was a gamble which almost worked, he was already alongside Hamilton round the outside. Also he only slightly harmed himself in that move and did not take anyone out. With hindsight it was the wrong attempt and he should have waited, but knowing how strong the Merc is on the straights and not knowing hot long the Softs will deliver the extra bit of performance it was a valid attempt. He was back up Hamilton's arse a few laps later.Restomaniac wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 18:52There was no way in hell that the Hamilton move was ever going to work for starters. Verstappen on the marbles in a place that is no way an overtaking place against a driver of Hamilton's experience and skill? Give over Max
I am not saying it was not deserving, but was lucky, Imagine if Senna, Alonso, Kimi and Vettel started their careers in championship winning cars like Lewis that's my point. Daniel started with that useless Hispania (HRT) carNathanOlder wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 16:43Lewis wasn't lucky, he fully deserved a top car and that was justified in his performance that year. How many drivers won every series they ever entered ? Lewis did and deserved a top car so it wasn't lucky.fabian77 wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 14:24He wasn't lucky to start his career in a championship winning car like Lewis did.NathanOlder wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 14:01
Indeed. Although only 10% of his victories having competed in about 60% of the races. So he's well off target that way
Neither is fine IMO. I like drivers to have to race, whether team mate or not.
Well, if someone got lucky today, it wasn't Bottas for sure.Mandrake wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 18:50Mhh Bottas had a good race, but Dotd? He fell back more than 3secs behind Vettel and then "got lucky" by pitting at the right time. Ferrari made a very bad call concerning the timing of the Pitstop and that made Bottas get the pass done.Bill_Kar wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 15:46My driver of the day is definitely Bottas.
Sure, Ricciardo was good no doubt, but I think Bottas will leave with some confidence.
He did a fantastic first stint staying close to Vettel, an incredible outlap, a marvellous overtake on Kimi, and he defended really well against Vettel & more so against Kimi towards the end(maybe not so with Ricciardo, but that was inevitable either way).
And then you wonder, what about Hamilton? I felt he was really lost the whole weekend. He is extremely lucky with how things developed
There were many flawless drivers today, Alonso, Hulkenberg, Vettel.....but Ricciardo was the one pulling off the moves. I doubt anyone else would have been able to cleanly perform these last minute braking attempts. Hence I'd be okay giving it to Ricciardo. You need to have the material but you need to make use of it. Today the likes of Hamilton, Verstappen and Raikkonen were "demolished" by their teammates despite having the same material.
Could be. Then I apologize for accusing you. We have a similar view I just see it as both teams using it and it's acceptable to them.Mansell89 wrote:Neither is fine IMO. I like drivers to have to race, whether team mate or not.
I never said Merc didn’t use Bottas the same way- perhaps mixing me up with someone else?
It was a great race with lots happening but I watching this left a bitter taste on my mouth, I'm glad that Kimi salvaged something from the race but this is tainted by the fact that Ferrari also gained, shame on them.
Yes. A new floor for Bahrain.JPBD1990 wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 17:34I think that is clear. Even if Mercedes end up the over all faster car (yet to be seen) Ferrari is riiiiiight there. Pretty sweet after the relative obscurity they’ve been in since 2009 really. I think Binotto is a great asset and I hope they’re throwing money at him to keep him there and keep him happy.LM10 wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 16:32I think Ferrari has done an overall good job. It was correct, it seems, that the SF71H has much potential, as it's been claimed from Ferrari side.foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑14 Apr 2018, 16:20You know what, I started to think ferrari engine might be more powerful.
I’m just curious though - it doesn’t appear as though any major upgrades are attributable to the performance increase since Australia. Could anyone speculate on why? Getting on top of setup - but what does that mean in practice? I ask as someone interested, with no technical knowledge.