it looks like its removed in the picture YOu can see where it fastens thoughkekekeke wrote:Is it only me that doesn't see how the bridge wing is fixed in the redbull car?
f#7king bullshit the cars were too fast, the FIA are a bunch of w#nkers, they cars are too slow, and if ur an f1 driver you take the risk of driving in the world most prestiges and fastest sport so live with the fear of deathfreedom_honda wrote:FIA: "wooooo the cars are too fast we need to slow them down ='["
its not possible to build a structure that dosent flex. The FIA should try making up rules they can actually enforcebazanaius wrote:anyone watching qualifying can you get a video of G fisichella's run about 9 seconds from the end of the first Q session? The sidepods are vibrating and deflecting loads as he goes down the straight. Thoughts?
B
this is why they need to attach a number instead of saying nothing can flex.bazanaius wrote:technically yes, but there are varying degrees of flexure.
I thought it could allow for greater flexing as it could be pulled down. The res appear to be propped up so the force acting down wouldn't pull the wing down that much but McLarens one seems to allow greater flexing.cookty wrote:Hi
Regarding mclaren bridge wing support and why its different from the rest do you think it still allows sum flex as the hook shaped part could deflect?