This is equally true for every single driver since the teams were limited to only two. Vettel wins in a Torro Rosso? Well, he only had Bourdais to beat. Well done to him. Maldonado wins in a Williams? Well, he only had to beat Bruno Senna. Well done to him. And, let's be realistic here, both their team mates crashed so, really, barely an achievement at all. Right? Certainly, no one would be stupid enough to bring these up as examples of good performances...right?
Kimi was very clear that pole was his for the taking but he got caught up behind another car (a Haas, I think) and that killed his chance at a final lap. Given his performance over the previous 15 mins of Q3 I see no reason to doubt him and it's not as if he constantly claims he would easily have been on Pole. The Merc drivers managed to match skill and track position, Ferrari didn't quite manage both but could easily have had pole with slightly better positioning. Regardless, makes for a far more interesting race tomorrow. Even assuming the Mercs finish lap 1 still in the same position, I expect Kimi to draw out Bottas allowing Vettel to pass both of them and attack Hamilton. Worst Vettel will finish tomorrow is 2nd and given Ferrari have generally outperformed Mercedes strategically there's every chance on a win and that's not even thinking about Ferrari getting their usual rocket starts. Hopefully, the race will be as interesting as qualifying was.
Personally, I'm disappointed the rain didn't come down at the end of Q1. It would've been an epic race to see five of the top 6 cars racing each other as they all had to carve through the entire field.
---
Sainz, Raikonnen, Hamilton and Bottas all put in really excellent laps during Q3, why is it so hard for people to simply appreciate the skill on display? Why the constant need to put down the achievements of others?