Same way everyone can somehow know what drivers intend to do, what they're thinking and how much car control they have
Same way everyone can somehow know what drivers intend to do, what they're thinking and how much car control they have
The trouble is we dont know how much pace Lewis or Seb had. So it may not have been the case. Even if Vettel caught Lewis , Seb wouldn't have passed. Seb only passed Bottas because his tyres were so worn. Lewis had 10 less laps on his tyres. So Lewis would never have had the tyre problems that bot had.
What did Toto say?cooken wrote:Yea terrible choice of words from Toto there. True, but still...
Those two statements are completely contrary.Restomaniac wrote: ↑29 Jul 2018, 16:59I hate team orders/manipulation.
Ferrari should have let a clearly quicker Raikkonen have a pop at Bottas too.
The sooner merc use bottas like ferrari do with kimi the better. Will be a fair fight at the front.
I’m pointing out the double standards on here.stuartpengs wrote: ↑29 Jul 2018, 17:27Those two statements are completely contrary.Restomaniac wrote: ↑29 Jul 2018, 16:59I hate team orders/manipulation.
Ferrari should have let a clearly quicker Raikkonen have a pop at Bottas too.
Another good race for Merc and HAM, points taken and lead increased where, truth be told, very few were expecting it. Track position is king here, I'm suprised there were so many varied predictions before the race. If you get away in the lead, have a clean stop, you're always in the box seat. Irrespective of Merc's form on hot hot tracks the delta to pass was just too much so they could run the car slower and still maintain the lead. Once HAM got out in the lead the win was in the bag, regardless of VET on US.
Looking forward to two stellar tracks next!