Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
DVB
11
Joined: 21 Aug 2015, 22:52

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
31 Aug 2018, 23:26
DVB wrote:
31 Aug 2018, 23:22
Nono, they still changed some details.

https://i.imgur.com/1EBWWXJ.jpg
First vane is mounted on nose and nose is off on that picture. :)
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

Btw, it's kinda strange Ferrari brought this new concept of sidepods since last year but doesn't seem to do many upgrades around it thru the year. The deflectors on the side, deflectors on the sidepod which extend it, always seem to stay the same thru the year. Any idea why?
Everybody is a Ferrari fan.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

MtthsMlw wrote:
31 Aug 2018, 12:34
siskue2005 wrote:
31 Aug 2018, 12:30
Is it used during the start?
Yeah seems u don't need too much pressure for pressing it, oddly the button looks like a hard press button from its look.

But why do they need an extra button? Manual deployment of energy? (I don't know if it is even allowed)
They release it at soon as the lights turn out at the start.
So it could be a control for the electric rear brake then?
"In downforce we trust"

MoP
MoP
8
Joined: 23 May 2017, 17:50

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

Image

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

DVB wrote:
31 Aug 2018, 23:32

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

Btw, it's kinda strange Ferrari brought this new concept of sidepods since last year but doesn't seem to do many upgrades around it thru the year. The deflectors on the side, deflectors on the sidepod which extend it, always seem to stay the same thru the year. Any idea why?
Well when you look at how teams generally develop this area, you notice they don't usually change it too oftrn, since it's very important for overall flow structures. You may see one or two teams doing one (small) change of side pod intake design per year, mostly because its either a massive gain or the, made a massive screw up in thr beggining. Mercedes did it in Austria this year for a massive gain for the rest of the year.

On Ferrari, this area seems particularly well developed with clear design goals very visible. Being such, improving it might hurt some of those original goals and/or hurt further development potential for some other areas.

What I'm very intersted in, is why barge board updates are so scarce. There are two possibilities - either they are very close to development potential (hardly) or they are reluctant to introduce new parts that would improve downforce potential but at the great cost of drag. In my view, Red Bull has too many surfaces in this area causing substantial amount of drag for downforce they gain. Red Bull had 3-4 updates in this area since roll-out, while Mercedes and Ferrari each had only one.

Also, it's good to remember that teams learned about 2019 changes very early this season, so they probably started splitting resources between 2018 and 2019 cars at that time. This would hinder any development that doesn't benefit 2018 as much as other areas do (since 2019 cars will be so different, there aren't many parts you can translate to them) and you still have to work on low-drag configuration for Spa and Monza.
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
henry
324
Joined: 23 Feb 2004, 20:49
Location: England

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

djos wrote:
01 Sep 2018, 00:55
MtthsMlw wrote:
31 Aug 2018, 12:34
siskue2005 wrote:
31 Aug 2018, 12:30
Is it used during the start?
Yeah seems u don't need too much pressure for pressing it, oddly the button looks like a hard press button from its look.

But why do they need an extra button? Manual deployment of energy? (I don't know if it is even allowed)
They release it at soon as the lights turn out at the start.
So it could be a control for the electric rear brake then?
That seems a reasonable suggestion.

What we need next is to see when it gets pressed.
Fortune favours the prepared; she has no favourites and takes no sides.
Truth is confirmed by inspection and delay; falsehood by haste and uncertainty : Tacitus

zioture
zioture
549
Joined: 12 Feb 2013, 12:46
Location: Italy

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

Image

Image

zioture
zioture
549
Joined: 12 Feb 2013, 12:46
Location: Italy

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

Image

Comparison Setup Mercedes Ferrari Monza

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

henry wrote:
01 Sep 2018, 09:22
djos wrote:
01 Sep 2018, 00:55
MtthsMlw wrote:
31 Aug 2018, 12:34

They release it at soon as the lights turn out at the start.
So it could be a control for the electric rear brake then?
That seems a reasonable suggestion.

What we need next is to see when it gets pressed.
Hmm. Wonder if there is a way to control just one side? Maybe just using the tolerance in the system, nothing illegal :twisted:
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

wunderkind
wunderkind
5
Joined: 04 Apr 2007, 06:12

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

There are talks that the Ferrari's floor is working so well that it allows the car to run less wing than the Mercedes. Of course, the Ferrari PU is now on the same level as Mercedes, if not better.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

wunderkind wrote:
02 Sep 2018, 07:52
There are talks that the Ferrari's floor is working so well that it allows the car to run less wing than the Mercedes. Of course, the Ferrari PU is now on the same level as Mercedes, if not better.
All you need to look at is this excellent comparison (pay attention to front wing as well):

zioture wrote:
01 Sep 2018, 11:45
Image

Comparison Setup Mercedes Ferrari Monza
And even with this much wing level, Hamilton was faster in speed trap than Ferrari and top speed in Monza is all about more power. If Spa wasn't enough, Monza confirms that SF71-H has better downforce to drag ratio than W09, something that was discussed here since cars were presented in February. In Lesmos, Ferrari wasn't lagging behind Mercedes in corner speed and these still aren't speeds were drag is starting to hinder acceleration trough corner, so more downforce for slightly more drag is acceptable there.

Ferrari PU seems to be better on acceleration, since they look like using electric power for longer in early acceleration from corner. However, there are strong arguments pointing towards Mercedes peak power supremacy, which is constant since 2014. And this fact is an astonishing achievement for Mercedes' amazing PU department.
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

FLuidd
FLuidd
-13
Joined: 28 Jul 2012, 17:29

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
02 Sep 2018, 11:43
wunderkind wrote:
02 Sep 2018, 07:52
There are talks that the Ferrari's floor is working so well that it allows the car to run less wing than the Mercedes. Of course, the Ferrari PU is now on the same level as Mercedes, if not better.
All you need to look at is this excellent comparison (pay attention to front wing as well):

zioture wrote:
01 Sep 2018, 11:45
http://www.newsf1.it/wp-content/uploads ... ricopg.jpg

Comparison Setup Mercedes Ferrari Monza
And even with this much wing level, Hamilton was faster in speed trap than Ferrari and top speed in Monza is all about more power. If Spa wasn't enough, Monza confirms that SF71-H has better downforce to drag ratio than W09, something that was discussed here since cars were presented in February. In Lesmos, Ferrari wasn't lagging behind Mercedes in corner speed and these still aren't speeds were drag is starting to hinder acceleration trough corner, so more downforce for slightly more drag is acceptable there.

Ferrari PU seems to be better on acceleration, since they look like using electric power for longer in early acceleration from corner. However, there are strong arguments pointing towards Mercedes peak power supremacy, which is constant since 2014. And this fact is an astonishing achievement for Mercedes' amazing PU department.
Do you think the shape of the front wing has anything to do with Ferrari's better drag than Mercedes?

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

FLuidd wrote:
02 Sep 2018, 12:32
Do you think the shape of the front wing has anything to do with Ferrari's better drag than Mercedes?
Yes, but that shape looks to be a consequence of raising side pod inlets (reducing front wing upwash, so top intake is usable), not an answer to lowering drag.
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
MtthsMlw
1036
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

Image

User avatar
F1NAC
170
Joined: 31 Mar 2013, 22:35

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

Still he had good pace with this kind of damage.

LM10
LM10
121
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 00:07

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF71H

Post

Definitely, he still managed it very well with this kind of damage.

So, next one is Singapore and that’s the next possibility for Ferrari to bring the new wastegate pipe layout. Do you guys think they’re gonna go for it?
It was just tested once. Maybe they weren’t happy enough.