Yeah we will be doing an article on this with quite a few drawings.
Yeah we will be doing an article on this with quite a few drawings.
Yes, because of the slant the taller rear wing box moves the rearmost point backwards - the bottom is now 550mm behind the RWCL not 450mm. Not sure why this is... likely for sponsors but could be to make a nice round value on the dimension, it will (along with the longer front wing overhang) make the cars look even longer than now though.
Am I mistaken, or do the drawings also not show that 'more than 400 mm from the car centre plane' divider in rules for the front wing profile? Nor are the 500, 800 mm boundaries for those two strakes shown, it seems.turbof1 wrote: ↑16 Oct 2018, 11:50Just going through these massive changes, me and jjn9128 noticed the drawings included in the pdf are not always correct. The bargeboards on the drawings for instance sit in an exclusion zone, and the front wing endplate does not extend to the full 1000mm unlike what the drawing tries to sell. So do keep that in mind.
Teams also get a technical appendix with more drawings, that's not available to the public though.
We are looking into it. jjn9128 already prepared something, so I think this week probably and if not next week. We might 2 articles, one to explain the regulations and one where we bring a feasible example. Currently we are discussing a possible loophole.subcritical71 wrote: ↑17 Oct 2018, 15:10Do you have an ETA on that? Not pushing, but I keep looking for it and if its going to be awhile I can stop doing that so frequently!
While I am sacrificing useless organs for the cause, you guys can enjoy part 1:
UV for the first article. Thanks, look forward to the 2nd.
The article was in full written by jjn9128, so he deserves full credit.