2017-2020 Aerodynamic Regulations Thread

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

jjn9128 wrote:
15 Oct 2018, 21:27
2019 regulations have been published on the FIA website today for anyone interested - fia.com/regulations

Good grief the front wing rules are now very convoluted...
Yeah we will be doing an article on this with quite a few drawings.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
AMG.Tzan
44
Joined: 24 Jan 2013, 01:35
Location: Greece

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

So it seems that rear wings will also get "lenghtier" (from side view) apart from taller, wider and deeper! The 2019 regulations state 810mm length instead of the 2018 710mm length! Am I right?
"The only rule is there are no rules" - Aristotle Onassis

User avatar
jjn9128
778
Joined: 02 May 2017, 23:53

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

AMG.Tzan wrote:
15 Oct 2018, 22:23
So it seems that rear wings will also get "lenghtier" (from side view) apart from taller, wider and deeper! The 2019 regulations state 810mm length instead of the 2018 710mm length! Am I right?
Yes, because of the slant the taller rear wing box moves the rearmost point backwards - the bottom is now 550mm behind the RWCL not 450mm. Not sure why this is... likely for sponsors but could be to make a nice round value on the dimension, it will (along with the longer front wing overhang) make the cars look even longer than now though.
#aerogandalf
"There is one big friend. It is downforce. And once you have this it’s a big mate and it’s helping a lot." Robert Kubica

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

Just going through these massive changes, me and jjn9128 noticed the drawings included in the pdf are not always correct. The bargeboards on the drawings for instance sit in an exclusion zone, and the front wing endplate does not extend to the full 1000mm unlike what the drawing tries to sell. So do keep that in mind.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

Surprised no one has bothered to mention that not only the rear wing will be wider, but it also widens the retraction by 5cm on each side giving this part of the rear wing more aero potential.

Image
Saishū kōnā

bosyber
bosyber
45
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 22:41

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

turbof1 wrote:
16 Oct 2018, 11:50
Just going through these massive changes, me and jjn9128 noticed the drawings included in the pdf are not always correct. The bargeboards on the drawings for instance sit in an exclusion zone, and the front wing endplate does not extend to the full 1000mm unlike what the drawing tries to sell. So do keep that in mind.
Am I mistaken, or do the drawings also not show that 'more than 400 mm from the car centre plane' divider in rules for the front wing profile? Nor are the 500, 800 mm boundaries for those two strakes shown, it seems.

User avatar
jjn9128
778
Joined: 02 May 2017, 23:53

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

bosyber wrote:
17 Oct 2018, 12:49
Am I mistaken, or do the drawings also not show that 'more than 400 mm from the car centre plane' divider in rules for the front wing profile? Nor are the 500, 800 mm boundaries for those two strakes shown, it seems.
Teams also get a technical appendix with more drawings, that's not available to the public though.
#aerogandalf
"There is one big friend. It is downforce. And once you have this it’s a big mate and it’s helping a lot." Robert Kubica

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

Aerogandalf and me are working on cringing the fia by getting our own appendix out 8)
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
subcritical71
90
Joined: 17 Jul 2018, 20:04
Location: USA-Florida

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

turbof1 wrote:
17 Oct 2018, 13:18
Aerogandalf and me are working on cringing the fia by getting our own appendix out 8)
Do you have an ETA on that? Not pushing, but I keep looking for it and if its going to be awhile I can stop doing that so frequently! [-o<

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

subcritical71 wrote:
17 Oct 2018, 15:10
turbof1 wrote:
17 Oct 2018, 13:18
Aerogandalf and me are working on cringing the fia by getting our own appendix out 8)
Do you have an ETA on that? Not pushing, but I keep looking for it and if its going to be awhile I can stop doing that so frequently! [-o<
We are looking into it. jjn9128 already prepared something, so I think this week probably and if not next week. We might 2 articles, one to explain the regulations and one where we bring a feasible example. Currently we are discussing a possible loophole.
#AeroFrodo

zac510
zac510
22
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 12:58

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

turbof1 wrote:
17 Oct 2018, 13:18
Aerogandalf and me are working on cringing the fia by getting our own appendix out 8)
I admire your dedication but you really don't need to get through a medical operation just for us on this website!

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

zac510 wrote:
17 Oct 2018, 16:46
turbof1 wrote:
17 Oct 2018, 13:18
Aerogandalf and me are working on cringing the fia by getting our own appendix out 8)
I admire your dedication but you really don't need to get through a medical operation just for us on this website!
While I am sacrificing useless organs for the cause, you guys can enjoy part 1:
https://www.f1technical.net/news/21879

We are going to do a second part where we will try to bring a realistic front wing to the table and discuss solutions.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

jjn9128 wrote:
17 Oct 2018, 13:14
bosyber wrote:
17 Oct 2018, 12:49
Am I mistaken, or do the drawings also not show that 'more than 400 mm from the car centre plane' divider in rules for the front wing profile? Nor are the 500, 800 mm boundaries for those two strakes shown, it seems.
Teams also get a technical appendix with more drawings, that's not available to the public though.
UV for the first article. Thanks, look forward to the 2nd.
Honda!

zac510
zac510
22
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 12:58

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

Thanks turbof1 and other contributing team!

Despite the restrictiveness of the rules, I'm curious to see how the front wing will work next year.

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: 2017-2020 Aerodynamic Technical Regulations

Post

zac510 wrote:
17 Oct 2018, 19:20
Thanks turbof1 and other contributing team!

Despite the restrictiveness of the rules, I'm curious to see how the front wing will work next year.
The article was in full written by jjn9128, so he deserves full credit.
#AeroFrodo