imo it doesn't because it chooses the highest possible in-cycle temperature to get highest powersubcritical71 wrote: ↑29 Dec 2018, 07:232 to 3 ppm. :shock: I would have never guessed a race engine would ever approach that level.
imo it doesn't because it chooses the highest possible in-cycle temperature to get highest powersubcritical71 wrote: ↑29 Dec 2018, 07:232 to 3 ppm. :shock: I would have never guessed a race engine would ever approach that level.
That graph is at lamda = 1. My common senss tell me the graph title is a typo.MarcJ wrote: ↑29 Dec 2018, 06:47While some of us recognise someone being funny, many won't so please use facts.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑28 Dec 2018, 00:38Yeah the SAE papers showed high levels of NOx.trinidefender wrote: ↑27 Dec 2018, 20:23
I don't think that it was ever explicitly stated that it was NOx that these PU's produce high levels of. It was just stated that the exhaust emissions weren't environmentally friendly or healthy to those around it.
If I had to guess, it would be fuel additives that would be the major cause of any harmful emissions.
If high levels of NOx are also present then I would imagine that they would be formed from the very high temperature flame jets.
Gas turbines suffer from that problem (where a lot of the development money is going to reduce NOx outputs on commercial turbofans). Even though the overall air:fuel ratio is very high, the combustion event itself is limited to a very small area where the mixture is much closer to stoichiometric. Ergo high combustion temperatures and high levels of NOx.
With ultra lean NOx emissions drop by 99.75% down to 2 or 3 parts per million.
The article is pretty much the same as https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/hond ... e/4317970/Thunder18 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2018, 02:08Wazari previously stated that these engines produce a lot of Nox, though never went into specific detail.
Can someone translate this news post?
https://f1-gate.com/honda/f1_46690.html
Oops, my bad. Thanksispano6 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2018, 04:24The article is pretty much the same as https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/hond ... e/4317970/Thunder18 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2018, 02:08Wazari previously stated that these engines produce a lot of Nox, though never went into specific detail.
Can someone translate this news post?
https://f1-gate.com/honda/f1_46690.html
So was there any interesting info in this?dren wrote: ↑27 Dec 2018, 14:17I bit the bullet and purchased a copy:
https://i.ibb.co/Bs7G7bz/1.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/r7D6S67/2.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/nLwFRnY/3.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/nf3xjPv/4.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/42yNFT7/4-1.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/wYfn0CB/5.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/LRMt5SL/5-1.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/1vjJqmX/6.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/ss0f6G3/7.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/zr4rG5N/8.jpg
That is because the very important parameter of charge air pressure comes into play. Which some posters here also did neglect. Highly boosted engines have a lot of Nitrogen to oxidise!Thunder18 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2018, 02:08Wazari previously stated that these engines produce a lot of Nox, though never went into specific detail.
Can someone translate this news post?
https://f1-gate.com/honda/f1_46690.html
Road engines have followed a very similar trajectory of increasing efficiency via turbos, higher pressures, higher temperatures and higher levels of such emissions that filters and converters then have to manage, although there is an amusing piece of propaganda floating around that this only happens to diesel vehicles.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑01 Jan 2019, 23:35That is because the very important parameter of charge air pressure comes into play. Which some posters here also did neglect. Highly boosted engines have a lot of Nitrogen to oxidise!
munudeges wrote: ↑02 Jan 2019, 19:04Road engines have followed a very similar trajectory of increasing efficiency via turbos, higher pressures, higher temperatures and higher levels of such emissions that filters and converters then have to manage, although there is an amusing piece of propaganda floating around that this only happens to diesel vehicles.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑01 Jan 2019, 23:35That is because the very important parameter of charge air pressure comes into play. Which some posters here also did neglect. Highly boosted engines have a lot of Nitrogen to oxidise!
This should not really be a big shock to anyone.
Well, 2000°C would mean a quite massive formation of thermal NOx.godlameroso wrote: ↑02 Jan 2019, 21:11https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XH08P5 ... G84DW08ZFImunudeges wrote: ↑02 Jan 2019, 19:04Road engines have followed a very similar trajectory of increasing efficiency via turbos, higher pressures, higher temperatures and higher levels of such emissions that filters and converters then have to manage, although there is an amusing piece of propaganda floating around that this only happens to diesel vehicles.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑01 Jan 2019, 23:35That is because the very important parameter of charge air pressure comes into play. Which some posters here also did neglect. Highly boosted engines have a lot of Nitrogen to oxidise!
This should not really be a big shock to anyone.
Andy Cowell claims that combustion gases are 2,000 degrees C, no doubt massively diluted by air, however that flame temp is enough to produce some NOx. Also interesting he claims exhaust gases at the turbine are ~1,000 C
The graph title (% NOx Reduction over Baseline SI (lambda=1)) simply means "% NOx Reduction over Baseline SI".PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑29 Dec 2018, 14:50That graph is at lamda = 1. My common senss tell me the graph title is a typo.
Specifically, gasoline fuel and exhaust gas are turned into hydrogen by using a catalyst, and the hydrogen is mixed with intake air. The combustion speed of hydrogen is very high, making the combustion in the engine cylinders faster. When a larger amount of exhaust gas is returned to the engine cylinders for EGR, combustion becomes difficult while fuel efficiency improves. The method can solve this problem.
Honda Motor Co Ltd is making efforts to develop a method that is different from the method of producing hydrogen.
I did came upon this interesting fuel reforming subject being set upon mostly by Japanese automakers including Honda. But I could not see how this fuel reforming will involve Honda F1 project because as long as Honda is involved in F1 it will have to abide by the F1 rules and regulations as regards the fuel used in F1. The way I understand it is, reforming the fuel as specified is changing the fuel specification when used.Snorked wrote: ↑03 Jan 2019, 13:15Rumour says Honda have been working with Exxon for 2019 on a new Honda development where the fuel passes through a device to give it an extra kick.
So Googling, and an article from 2016 popped up - this seems to be fuel reforming, is this allowed in F1?:
https://tech.nikkeibp.co.jp/dm/atclen/n ... 041500509/
Specifically, gasoline fuel and exhaust gas are turned into hydrogen by using a catalyst, and the hydrogen is mixed with intake air. The combustion speed of hydrogen is very high, making the combustion in the engine cylinders faster. When a larger amount of exhaust gas is returned to the engine cylinders for EGR, combustion becomes difficult while fuel efficiency improves. The method can solve this problem.Honda Motor Co Ltd is making efforts to develop a method that is different from the method of producing hydrogen.