McLaren MCL34

[makecry]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzX-XhqWsAA_zk1.jpg:large

If you look at it closely, a lot of elements look like last year's elements on steroids.

[shotzski]

A good read of every detail of the car
https://www.patreon.com/posts/24709871

[mclaren111]

https://i.imgur.com/eI6YjxZ.jpg

What is that on the underside of the RW - righthand side ??

Seems like a small winglet under the mainplate.

Legal ? What's it's purpose ?

[imightbewrong]

It is a reflection

[the EDGE]

It is a reflection

i don't think it is, because if you watch the autosport car analysis where these stills were taken from you can clearly see it as the camera pans round at arpound 4:50

[imightbewrong]

It is a reflection

i don't think it is, because if you watch the autosport car analysis where these stills were taken from you can clearly see it as the camera pans round at arpound 4:50

https://youtu.be/qKiyUr7kG-g

Just consider, if it was a winglet, don't you think the person in the video analyzing the car would bring up such a radical thing?
It is a reflection.

[the EDGE]

It is a reflection

i don't think it is, because if you watch the autosport car analysis where these stills were taken from you can clearly see it as the camera pans round at arpound 4:50

https://youtu.be/qKiyUr7kG-g

Just consider, if it was a winglet, don't you think the person in the video analyzing the car would bring up such a radical thing?
It is a reflection.

Well I agree with your point, but I’ve never seen a shadow act like that before

[Jef Patat]

Just consider, if it was a winglet, don't you think the person in the video analyzing the car would bring up such a radical thing?
It is a reflection.

So because someone doesn't mention something it doesn't exist? Strange logic

Check the official video around 24-25 s. A reflection doesn't block a gap and doesn't have its own reflection.

https://youtu.be/cE417LrFAgY?t=24

[kfrantzios]

no winglet, just a ton of reflections

[imightbewrong]

Just consider, if it was a winglet, don't you think the person in the video analyzing the car would bring up such a radical thing?
It is a reflection.

So because someone doesn't mention something it doesn't exist? Strange logic

Check the official video around 24-25 s. A reflection doesn't block a gap and doesn't have its own reflection.

https://youtu.be/cE417LrFAgY?t=24

No, it was just a sanity check. The guy is standing a few feets away, analyzing the technical aspects of the car. Pointing out details and new stuff, I think he would notice. But its just a sanity check..

Your new video just reaffirms that it is a reflection, at least to me. And now kfrantzios picture of the back makes it even more obvious.

We have these reflection issues every year, and 99% of the time it is a reflection, just as this time.

But then again... imightbewrong

[f1rules]

another thing, the mcl34 did not feature any bargeboards/flowconditioners under the front part chassis, behind the nosecone, im sure it will not stay like that

[M840TR]

another thing, the mcl34 did not feature any bargeboards/flowconditioners under the front part chassis, behind the nosecone, im sure it will not stay like that

The turning vanes. Definitely.

[f1rules]

exactly, forgot the name

[Alexmarq]

It is a reflection

i don't think it is, because if you watch the autosport car analysis where these stills were taken from you can clearly see it as the camera pans round at arpound 4:50

https://youtu.be/qKiyUr7kG-g

There's definitely something under the rear wing mainland looking at the video

[the EDGE]