Waiting for Williams to show up .Benii6 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2019, 13:432nd slowest, pls be accurate.
Waiting for Williams to show up .Benii6 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2019, 13:432nd slowest, pls be accurate.
Should be that one:
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Thunder wrote: ↑19 Feb 2019, 13:58Should be that one:mclaren111 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2019, 13:57Yep, definitely a new floor, they’ll probably back to back it soon. The bardge board elements are usually attached to the floor so it will be interesting seeing any updates in that area
Can you add a link or a photo ??
https://twitter.com/motorpuntoes/status ... 2208732160
Yesterday Sainz did a longer run in the afternoon, after car turned off, and he seemed slow (1:24s). I think it was about 30ish laps with 2 "pitstops". It's probably where "McLaren are slow" stories came from. So far their programmes look similar so we may see the same longer run by Lando in the afternoon.
Agreed. I am quite surprised with the way most pundits dismissed McLaren, especially if it is true that they had a fundamental issue with the car. If you have a fundamental issue, I am assuming resolving it immediately unlocks decent amount of potential, and then with improved integration of Renault engine and supposed Renault gains over the winter, it should mean McLaren can be a decent midfield team, but most pundits dismiss McLaren like a bottom runner with glory runs.RonDennis wrote: ↑19 Feb 2019, 14:43Well, it's possible that the car might be not as quick as they expected, but in my opinion it's most important that the fundamental flaw has been fixed. McLaren has always been great with development during the year and the more changes you introduce, the bigger the chance is that you will make some mistakes. People are always expecting miracles, but miracles don't happen in F1. Maybe Key can take some Red Bull tricks with him.
Yeah, simply because they run the C4 tire. I guess that isn't allowed if you're McLaren, but it's perfectly fine if you're Toro Rosso or Haas. I don't see the point in glory runs anyway, what's the point of making you good look and failing in Melbourne, doesn't that make you look foolish. Or do they actually believe sponsors will pay you millions, because you're second on the first day of testing. McLaren can't do much good these days.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑19 Feb 2019, 14:55Agreed. I am quite surprised with the way most pundits dismissed McLaren, especially if it is true that they had a fundamental issue with the car. If you have a fundamental issue, I am assuming resolving it immediately unlocks decent amount of potential, and then with improved integration of Renault engine and supposed Renault gains over the winter, it should mean McLaren can be a decent midfield team, but most pundits dismiss McLaren like a bottom runner with glory runs.RonDennis wrote: ↑19 Feb 2019, 14:43Well, it's possible that the car might be not as quick as they expected, but in my opinion it's most important that the fundamental flaw has been fixed. McLaren has always been great with development during the year and the more changes you introduce, the bigger the chance is that you will make some mistakes. People are always expecting miracles, but miracles don't happen in F1. Maybe Key can take some Red Bull tricks with him.