well, I think it's stupid when people want it to rain because they don't find racing in regular conditions interesting enough.erudite450 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 09:57No offense but that is frankly one of the most stupid things I have heard/read in a long time. A condition that tends to level the playing field a bit is somehow "just fake drama". I'm dumbfounded!
I wouldn't call rain fake drama. It would be fake if it is artificial, like if they made the track wet with sprinklers. Rather, rain can make a race chaotic, and way less about your car's performance. There is always a case to be made for chaos from time to time. 2011 Canadian Grand Prix for instance. One of the most memorable races I have ever seen.dans79 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 13:19well, I think people wanting it to rain because they don't find regular racing interesting is stupid.erudite450 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 09:57No offense but that is frankly one of the most stupid things I have heard/read in a long time. A condition that tends to level the playing field a bit is somehow "just fake drama". I'm dumbfounded!
it was in the first 30 minutes of fp1, that set of tyres would be given back during the session anyway.Restomaniac wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 11:58I doubt being covered in oil will have helped the set of tyres either.adrianjordan wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 11:55If that hydraulic fluid got into the back of the Williams, what sort of issues could that cause?
will it be held?
I’d forgotten about that. Thanks.ian_s wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 14:00it was in the first 30 minutes of fp1, that set of tyres would be given back during the session anyway.Restomaniac wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 11:58I doubt being covered in oil will have helped the set of tyres either.adrianjordan wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 11:55If that hydraulic fluid got into the back of the Williams, what sort of issues could that cause?
Indeed. But logic and F1 don’t always go hand in handturbof1 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 13:08Restomaniac wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 12:33I think that’s a given and Williams will ultimately lose out. Something that Williams cannot afford. Like I say it’s more a case of what happens if they lose a component that will eventually cost them a grid penalty or a retirement (due to a replacement/failure choice).FrukostScones wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 12:24Haas settles with Sepang Cicuit.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/13899 ... ith-sepang
I think I can remember something about that when it happened to HAAS. Although they did not have to change a PU component, they would have been allowed to make a free change if needed. But I'm not sure if I am remembering it correctly.
Would be the logical thing to do anyway. This is completely outside the team's responsibility. The team is already unfairly punished regarding putting extra man hours into rebuilding a car, plus given such cases take months to recuperate the financial damage, will put strains on the cash flow as well.
Have you seen the footage ? this was no where near a kerb or corner, it was right in the middle of the track on the racing line.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 12:11Driving on the kerbs is not obligatory - the drivers do it because it's quicker. Their problem then.
Loose manholes are outside of the drivers' / teams' control so damage caused should be open to a "free" repair of controlled items such as the battery.
Try reading what I wrote and what I was responding to, not what you think I wrote.Unc1eM0nty wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 14:16Have you seen the footage ? this was no where near a kerb or corner, it was right in the middle of the track on the racing line.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 12:11Driving on the kerbs is not obligatory - the drivers do it because it's quicker. Their problem then.
Loose manholes are outside of the drivers' / teams' control so damage caused should be open to a "free" repair of controlled items such as the battery.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/14295 ... n-schedule
Just_a_fan wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 14:29Try reading what I wrote and what I was responding to, not what you think I wrote.Unc1eM0nty wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 14:16Have you seen the footage ? this was no where near a kerb or corner, it was right in the middle of the track on the racing line.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 12:11
Driving on the kerbs is not obligatory - the drivers do it because it's quicker. Their problem then.
Loose manholes are outside of the drivers' / teams' control so damage caused should be open to a "free" repair of controlled items such as the battery.