"Zak Brown should not be digging around for steering wheels"vdemeter wrote: ↑21 May 2019, 02:13This is really embarrassing!
https://apnews.com/a8653967a9714ac7a9a3ba576f712fff
"Zak Brown should not be digging around for steering wheels"vdemeter wrote: ↑21 May 2019, 02:13This is really embarrassing!
https://apnews.com/a8653967a9714ac7a9a3ba576f712fff
If Alonso didn't crash his car the crew might have found a good set up in time, so he did no favors to his team. Simply leaving McLaren is not going to get Alonso a full-time seat at a front running team either. Andretti might have obliged while McLaren were still partnered with Honda, but there is no such obligation now.
A crash can happen. And a the team must be prepared for that. But for Mclaren, it was more important to have a car in the right shade of papaya than at the circuit in case of something went wrong. They weren't prepared to race, all the project seemed a bit made in a rush. And with the resources and money they have, it's a big embarrasment for the company.ispano6 wrote: ↑22 May 2019, 05:39
If Alonso didn't crash his car the crew might have found a good set up in time, so he did no favors to his team. Simply leaving McLaren is not going to get Alonso a full-time seat at a front running team either. Andretti might have obliged while McLaren were still partnered with Honda, but there is no such obligation now.
It seems a bit rushed to have Bob Fernley appointed President of McLaren Indy in November and expect him to have a winning contender car by May. Maybe Zak just needed to hire a disposable fall guy as insurance. Maybe Seidl is feeling a bit more pressure now to save face for McLaren at Monaco? Will we see Zak Brown at Monaco now that they won't be participating in the Indy 500?
Actually, I believe this is a step up, safety wise, from the halo. It looks like they have incorporated both the halo and original aeroscreen solutions into one. While I don't like it aesthetically, I would have to say that it may do a better job than then current halo does, especially at smaller debris that could bypass the halo and impact the driver.jjn9128 wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 17:09Indycar to use the Red Bull Aeroscreen (original concept merged with the halo) from next year. IMO it looks good! Could it have a future in F1?
https://www.redbulladvancedtechnologies ... 0x1620.jpg
https://www.redbulladvancedtechnologies ... 0x1620.jpg
https://www.redbulladvancedtechnologies ... 0x1620.jpg
https://www.redbulladvancedtechnologies ... 0x1620.jpg
Images from Red Bull technologies.
The only thing I find interesting is that Indycar initially rejected the halo for reasons of "visibility" on ovals. It looks like this device may be taller to counter that, but it seems to be a reversal on that position.subcritical71 wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 17:22Actually, I believe this is a step up, safety wise, from the halo. It looks like they have incorporated both the halo and original aeroscreen solutions into one. While I don't like it aesthetically, I would have to say that it may do a better job than then current halo does, especially at smaller debris that could bypass the halo and impact the driver.
I could see the FIA/F1 adopting this.
The biggest problem with a screen like this for F1 is rain, which on ovals they don’t have to deal with.jjn9128 wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 17:09Indycar to use the Red Bull Aeroscreen (original concept merged with the halo) from next year. IMO it looks good! Could it have a future in F1?
https://www.redbulladvancedtechnologies ... 0x1620.jpg
https://www.redbulladvancedtechnologies ... 0x1620.jpg
https://www.redbulladvancedtechnologies ... 0x1620.jpg
https://www.redbulladvancedtechnologies ... 0x1620.jpg
Images from Red Bull technologies.
The engine air intake on an indycar goes through the sidepods. Could move the intakes around on an F1 car as there's no need for it to be high for ram pressure with forced induction. Could put it atop the sidepods like the F3 (formerly GP3) car, or in a similar place to the Sauber split sidepods.