Morteza wrote: ↑26 May 2019, 20:46The marshal Perez said "I nearly killed him"
https://twitter.com/FiftyBucksss/status ... 12192?s=09
Morteza wrote: ↑26 May 2019, 20:46The marshal Perez said "I nearly killed him"
https://twitter.com/FiftyBucksss/status ... 12192?s=09
Could even been that they weren’t per say trying to get in front of Bottas but more maintaining position. Bottas his stop was 0.6 slower than Verstappen’s. Normally when you do a stop together, and have the same pitstop times you won’t change positions. Any hesitation and they would of been fourth on track as well. A split second decision that went wrong.Restomaniac wrote: ↑27 May 2019, 11:24I doubt many would argue about RedBull trying it. It’s just that some during the race on here were trying to excuse RedBull whilst blaming anyone or anything in sight aka stewards, rules, pit lane (yes seriously), etc instead of looking RedBull themselves.zac510 wrote: ↑27 May 2019, 09:18Thinking about it a bit, RBR had two choices; make an unsafe release, or yield to both Bottas and Vettel in the pitlane. They chose to chance it with the unsafe release; if the Merc stop had been 0.5 slower they might have gotten away with it. Being further forward in the pitlane compromises their release.
In hindsight they might have preferred to leave Max out to take track position (or 'do the opposite of Bottas') and run to a similar length strategy as Gasly. From 1st he perhaps could have been more effective pressuring Hamilton to chase and overcook his tyres, as Hamilton attempted to close the pit window.
Ah, beautiful hindsight![]()
Yes, and the big issue is that Red Bull clearly decided to do an unsafe release, and the stewards let it pay off. So in future teams can juggle with that tradeoff- is it worth 5s? Sometimes it will be, so FIA have basically licensed unsafe releases in the pitlane, at that price.Restomaniac wrote: ↑27 May 2019, 11:24
I doubt many would argue about RedBull trying it. It’s just that some during the race on here were trying to excuse RedBull whilst blaming anyone or anything in sight aka stewards, rules, pit lane (yes seriously), etc instead of looking RedBull themselves.
don't forget he couldn't alter his speed as his and Bottas' wheels were between each other, any contact of tyres front to rear could have resulted in a car flipping towards the people in the pit lane, it may be that the jink to his right was because of movement he saw in the people to his left i'm not a fan of Max but in that case he really didn't have any options once the team put him there, there literally was no where to go till they approached the pit exit where there were no people that could be hit.DutchDopey wrote: ↑26 May 2019, 22:19OW come on, the team released Max and he had no where to go. He was dropped in the middle of it. He could not go left because that was dangerous for the pit crews and he could not go right because Bottas was there. Blaming Max is just childish anti fanboyism.ubuysa wrote: ↑26 May 2019, 21:03I'm sorry but Max has learned nothing since last year. Theres nothing wrong with being aggressive but Max is just plain dirty.
They let him go quickly at the pit stop which was fair enough, but when Max realised he wasn't going to get ahead of Bottas he tried to run him off the road. That's not acceptable.
I've watched the Lewis contact many times now and although Max locked up I'm convinced he was trying to nudge Lewis into a spin. It was the only way he was ever going to get past on that track. Also not acceptable.
Leclerc is an aggressive and talented driver too but he knows these aren't stock cars. Max still has to learn that. He's still a danger to himself and all those around him.
What I meant was the team had pre-decided to release him whether it was safe or not. Solely focused as you say, and yes into a crowded pitlane where there's no space for two cars. They could arrange to see, if they'd wanted, with a tall guy or from above.nevill3 wrote: ↑27 May 2019, 13:16Red Bull neither decide on the unsafe release or not. The team was solely focused on servicing Verstappen as quickly as possible and getting him on his way. The crowded pit lane with Ferrari mechanics out too meant that they would have been unable to see exactly when Bottas was released. The relatively slower pit stop of Mercedes 0.6 seconds, meant that Bottas was slightly compromised. In a normal pitlane there is enough space for two but this is Monaco!
They have to know it's safe, and it is if there are no cars moving upstream. If a car is moving from 1 or 2 garages up it's not safe, but they didn't wanna wait. Which we can understand, and with these stewards the team knew it might pay off, my point is just that as it is a dangerous thing, cars interlocking wheels alongside dozens of people, the stewards should be making sure teams don't dare to roll the dice on it.Brake Horse Power wrote: ↑27 May 2019, 13:27I think the margins between cars in this pitlane are so small it is almost impossible to decide when is it a safe/unsafe release. At least you will always not know for sure it is safe..
One thing Max could have done was to stall all the drivers behind on track, let Lewis pull a gap and try to overcome these 5 seconds.. That would be driving for second at best.nt
Was it not LH who was penalized for driving slowly in Bahrain 2017, blocking Ricardo in the process entering the pits after the safety car for double stacking ? If rules are to be applied the same should be applicable for Bothas. It was indeed strange.ThumbsUp wrote: ↑27 May 2019, 13:36Why isnt Bottas at least been investigated for holding up Max and Vettel? He’s clearly more then 10 car lengths behind Hamilton.
Bottas is entering the pits and Hamilton is just leaving. That’s at least a gap of 5 seconds.
https://streamable.com/6ue8q
TBH even though the penalty WAS lenient the net result IMHO was the same (4th place) due to the top 4 pace difference to everyone else.izzy wrote: ↑27 May 2019, 11:41Yes, and the big issue is that Red Bull clearly decided to do an unsafe release, and the stewards let it pay off. So in future teams can juggle with that tradeoff- is it worth 5s? Sometimes it will be, so FIA have basically licensed unsafe releases in the pitlane, at that price.Restomaniac wrote: ↑27 May 2019, 11:24
I doubt many would argue about RedBull trying it. It’s just that some during the race on here were trying to excuse RedBull whilst blaming anyone or anything in sight aka stewards, rules, pit lane (yes seriously), etc instead of looking RedBull themselves.