Verstappen with the new front wing according to AMuS' speculation:
![Image](https://www.racefans.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/racefansdotnet-20190629-133308-30.jpg)
Gasly:
![Image](https://www.racefans.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/racefansdotnet-20190629-133250-32.jpg)
Verstappen:
![Image](https://www.racefans.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/racefansdotnet-20190629-145413-33.jpg)
Gasly:
![Image](https://www.racefans.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/racefansdotnet-20190629-145240-38.jpg)
Source: Racefans.net
EDIT: Some differences in flap geometry in the y250 area. The new one being more pointy. Old one below.
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/mTq4hP9/RB15-Austria-Q-Max-Gasly.jpg)
I think they've gone back to having standard 5 element without slit. These pictures are from fp3/qualifying today. The Gasly wing is a bit odd tbh because that doesn't feature the slit either so I assume that's the spec 1 wing.Sieper wrote: ↑30 Jun 2019, 00:24But that is not the new wing. That was the spec 1 wing that you show (that Verstappen has here) later they shorted one of those pointy extensions in order to make a slit in the lower one (and still adhere to the 5 elements). Like per the Gasly (say spec 2 wing) they did Ofcourse already have many endplate and upper element outwash changes.
Verstappen did ran a new wing but I don’t think this picture was it.
No this is the launch spec without the split tip flap. They both ran split tip but the main difference is in the main plane. Verstappens wing curves upward more agressivelyMorteza wrote: ↑29 Jun 2019, 23:53Looking at the photos above Verstappen is using this
https://imgr3.auto-motor-und-sport.de/R ... 606313.jpg
Is it just me, or is there a diff near the end plate. It looks like the wing leading edge is meeting the end plate at a higher point.ME4ME wrote: ↑29 Jun 2019, 23:37Qualifying pictures:
Verstappen with the new front wing according to AMuS' speculation:
https://www.racefans.net/wp-content/upl ... 308-30.jpg
Gasly:
https://www.racefans.net/wp-content/upl ... 250-32.jpg
Verstappen:
https://www.racefans.net/wp-content/upl ... 413-33.jpg
Gasly:
https://www.racefans.net/wp-content/upl ... 240-38.jpg
Source: Racefans.net
EDIT: Some differences in flap geometry in the y250 area. The new one being more pointy. Old one below.
https://ibb.co/YQkhfVc
..and they don't care to take an additional PU in later races where they stand no chance anyway. That's good for PU development and for the performance in single races like this, where, im my opinion, they used all the power they have.AMG.Tzan wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 15:20I still can't clearly see where this car is lacking! For example Ferrari clearly loses out in downforce.
-Engine power for sure is down a bit compared to Mercedes and Ferrari because even with DRS for Max, Leclerc was able to pass him with a little bit better exit!
-But the chassis don't seem so great either i think! They don't seem to have Mercedes's amount of downforce nor Ferrari's "low drag" advantage.
-The car seems like something in between Mercedes and Ferrari in terms of concept.
I don't know if Austria was an exception in terms of how fast RB is...at least i think so! I think it had more to do with Max overdelivering and Red Bull executing a great strategy with the mediums, something Mercedes didn't do for some reason!
I suspect the real comparison has to be with mercedes. It s known that this year Ferrari has to run as much wing as possible due to the otherwise limited downforce from the bodywork.lio007 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 20:36That's another good comparison:
https://cdn-1.motorsport.com/images/amp ... -sf90-.jpg
Not high quality, but...mmred wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 21:25I suspect the real comparison has to be with mercedes. It s known that this year Ferrari has to run as much wing as possible due to the otherwise limited downforce from the bodywork.lio007 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 20:36That's another good comparison:
https://cdn-1.motorsport.com/images/amp ... -sf90-.jpg
A photo of bottas overtake would tell the real difference. Surely in favour of Redbull again.