Is the upgrade not successful? Who has reported that?yelistener wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 15:57Just when Mercedes gets a not-so successful upgrade and you'd think Ferrari could benefit from that, Ferrari beat themselves first.
Is the upgrade not successful? Who has reported that?yelistener wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 15:57Just when Mercedes gets a not-so successful upgrade and you'd think Ferrari could benefit from that, Ferrari beat themselves first.
Not sure but I think it was mentioned that they reverted some of their aero. Don't quote me on that though.zibby43 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 15:58Is the upgrade not successful? Who has reported that?yelistener wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 15:57Just when Mercedes gets a not-so successful upgrade and you'd think Ferrari could benefit from that, Ferrari beat themselves first.
If we adjust for tire and normal Ferrari Q3 mode, could Leclerc have beaten Hamilton's time?
Didn't Lewis choose to go back to use some of the old spec before quali??zibby43 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 15:58Is the upgrade not successful? Who has reported that?yelistener wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 15:57Just when Mercedes gets a not-so successful upgrade and you'd think Ferrari could benefit from that, Ferrari beat themselves first.
No Mercedes just closed up their wider bodies due to the temps no being baking hot.Sierra117 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 15:59Not sure but I think it was mentioned that they reverted some of their aero. Don't quote me on that though.zibby43 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 15:58Is the upgrade not successful? Who has reported that?yelistener wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 15:57Just when Mercedes gets a not-so successful upgrade and you'd think Ferrari could benefit from that, Ferrari beat themselves first.
Sure, except in this case it's pushing it too far. This is Ferrari's problem. They let themselves down. Saying Lec would have beaten Hamilton had it not been for whatever issue there was, is conjecture because Hamilton just posted a monster time himself. I certainly wasn't expecting him to hit that, maybe others did.
My understanding as well.Restomaniac wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 16:02No Mercedes just closed up their wider bodies due to the temps no being baking hot.
My worst fears realized. Rain tomorrow would be a treat though. Everyone starting on inters, so let it be written, so let it be done.
I’m sure Leclerc would easily have been in a position to beat Hamilton’s time. I don’t know how you know that Ferrari pushed it too far or even showed their hands before Q3? Leclerc did a 1:12.2 in Q1 already.Sierra117 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 16:05Sure, except in this case it's pushing it too far. This is Ferrari's problem. They let themselves down. Saying Lec would have beaten Hamilton had it not been for whatever issue there was, is conjecture because Hamilton just posted a monster time himself. I certainly wasn't expecting him to hit that, maybe others did.
It's a perspective, yes, but one based on a big if. Facts are that Ferrari's reliability came up, which is a mechanical, mathematical issue (not external like rain, meteor etc.).
Trust me I didn't want to see Lec or Vet out. But that's just how it is.