Having watched Lewis's on board pole lap, it was a very scruffy lap.
While the softs were faster, it seems like no one could get them to last an entire lap.
I was watching when Senna was still racing for Lotus, but that's irrelevant. The fact is since Austria, the RBR has taken a clear step forward, and has closed the gap to both Ferrari and Mercedes. Honda has said they don't have as strong a qualifying mode as Mercedes or Ferrari, however we have seen that the race pace is there. Again, you will see tomorrow.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 17:08Little buddy?godlameroso wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 16:56If you take that as a meaningful representation of pace over 67 laps, you have a lot to learn little buddy. It's ok, you'll see tomorrow.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 16:30
Mercedes far far ahead (and this was in the 39 degree heat which they dont like, so expect it to be more tomorrow)
https://scontent-amt2-1.cdninstagram.co ... tagram.com
Much to learn? I watch F1 since 1999
And all responses to your post are saying the same: you are saying things that are contrary to the data at hand. All data point to Merc having a clear race pace advantage and they start on the preferred tyre (Max just now confirmed he wanted to start on medium too in Ziggo interview). And instead of taking back your words you start hitting out at people who point you to the facts.
Ps: I am supporting Max and RBH too, but I am being realistic that in the race P3 will likely be the maximum result unless Verstappen goes into magic zone again.
Imagine giving Verstappen and Hamilton the same car. Mouth watering stuff every quali and race.TAG wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 20:00Just a thought about Bottas on days like this. When you have to DRIVE the car, it's where his gap to Hamilton is greatest. We know there are some drivers that can squeeze just a little more out of a car that isn't in the perfect window, adapt their style to suit. I would have loved to have seen Leclerc's lap, I believe there would have been less than a tenth between them, despite Mercedes being down all weekend.
I'm hoping for rain tomorrow because a performance between Hamilton and Verstappen in the wet for an entire race would be sublime.
Dont get me wrong, I HOPE you are right and that I can say tomorrow: godlamaro you were right, because I have the feeling we both want Max and Honda to win. So lets hope I have to swallow my words tomorrow.godlameroso wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 20:44I was watching when Senna was still racing for Lotus, but that's irrelevant. The fact is since Austria, the RBR has taken a clear step forward, and has closed the gap to both Ferrari and Mercedes. Honda has said they don't have as strong a qualifying mode as Mercedes or Ferrari, however we have seen that the race pace is there. Again, you will see tomorrow.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 17:08Little buddy?godlameroso wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 16:56
If you take that as a meaningful representation of pace over 67 laps, you have a lot to learn little buddy. It's ok, you'll see tomorrow.
Much to learn? I watch F1 since 1999
And all responses to your post are saying the same: you are saying things that are contrary to the data at hand. All data point to Merc having a clear race pace advantage and they start on the preferred tyre (Max just now confirmed he wanted to start on medium too in Ziggo interview). And instead of taking back your words you start hitting out at people who point you to the facts.
Ps: I am supporting Max and RBH too, but I am being realistic that in the race P3 will likely be the maximum result unless Verstappen goes into magic zone again.
He did 7,8,9,10 and 11 better than anyone else, pole was just the result of that.dans79 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 20:37Having watched Lewis's on board pole lap, it was a very scruffy lap.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh2pzFreJ9k
While the softs were faster, it seems like no one could get them to last an entire lap.
Toto was quoted as saying that they are happy with the upgrades and that all of them have delivered, but they are not happy with the performance.dans79 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 20:37Having watched Lewis's on board pole lap, it was a very scruffy lap.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh2pzFreJ9k
While the softs were faster, it seems like no one could get them to last an entire lap.
He had moments on the exit of 2 & 8, so it could have been better!godlameroso wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 20:48He did 7,8,9,10 and 11 better than anyone else, pole was just the result of that.dans79 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 20:37Having watched Lewis's on board pole lap, it was a very scruffy lap.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh2pzFreJ9k
While the softs were faster, it seems like no one could get them to last an entire lap.
Likely damaged the floor, it's very easy to do that in turn 1 and the stadium section.zibby43 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 21:39Bottas just claimed a few minutes ago he was running with a damaged car today. Anyone else have details?
https://twitter.com/ValtteriBottas/stat ... 69059?s=20
Which same car?Pyrone89 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 20:45Imagine giving Verstappen and Hamilton the same car. Mouth watering stuff every quali and race.TAG wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 20:00Just a thought about Bottas on days like this. When you have to DRIVE the car, it's where his gap to Hamilton is greatest. We know there are some drivers that can squeeze just a little more out of a car that isn't in the perfect window, adapt their style to suit. I would have loved to have seen Leclerc's lap, I believe there would have been less than a tenth between them, despite Mercedes being down all weekend.
I'm hoping for rain tomorrow because a performance between Hamilton and Verstappen in the wet for an entire race would be sublime.
Can this new chassis be a bit fragile?zibby43 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 21:39Bottas just claimed a few minutes ago he was running with a damaged car today. Anyone else have details?
https://twitter.com/ValtteriBottas/stat ... 69059?s=20