And count me in from the Great (?) State of Texas.holeindalip wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 23:36refreshing to see another fellow member from stateside, Hello from illinois mate!
Socialize losses, privatize profits. It's the ecosystem between the rich and those in power. Bernie became quite the wealthy fella when he was driving the sport.
For big events you've got to avoid the Hotels like the plague. Airbnb, Vrbo, and the like are where you get good deals. For Austin this year, 2 buddies and I rented a small 3 bedroom house for 4 nights, the total was ~$850 USD.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑01 Aug 2019, 23:32You'd still be spending several thousand dollars to do that. Prices go up for event weekends so hotels etc get expensive. Even camping can be expensive.
F1 isn't cheap. You need to be committed to the cause to go to several races.
The FIA should go further and permanetly remove the Stewards who made that shocking decision. It was clearly biased and has no place in professional sport. We aren’t talking about a grey area here and it was clear cheating (by the Stewards) who just ignored the standard penalty and made 1 up on the spot IMHO.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2019, 22:51It was a disgrace, only without consequences because LEC did not finish anyway. Imagine if he had won and this would have been the deciding factor.iotar__ wrote: ↑01 Aug 2019, 22:45BREAKING NEWS, BREAKTHROUGH IN F1's PENALTY SYSTEM. https://www.motorsportweek.com/news/id/23913 "Stewards to impose time penalties for unsafe releases"
Well no s..., water is wet as well. They're pretending as if was some uncertain area that needed their damn reconsideration. Shameless favouritism is swept under the carpet as clarification. Team fine or time penalty, decisions, decisions. Who would have thought it was a time penalty to begin with.
Let's call a spade spade. This is basically open admission to cheating: yes we did it but only once. Only in F1 bizarro world. You want Ferrari to win one race, make 15 s pitstop by "mistake" when they're second, like RB's open gift in Barcelona 201x .
They informed us before the race in Germany. So they would probably do the same this weekend. No excuse --- last weekend I'm afraid buddy.iotar__ wrote: ↑01 Aug 2019, 18:01If Hamilton is not well again it would be better if they informed about it before the race . If they do it afterwards it may be considered an excuse.
Can't wait for another team fine for unsafe release. That's F1 for you, you can buy yourself unsafe behaviour as long as you're Ferrari.
Yeah, I was attending races in '91 and '94 and those were the worst times. They were doing "business" in containers and mobile homes around the track..hunting for Germans mostly, who came for Schumacher. Later it had declined because of increasing police presence, and now I think it's almost completely eliminted around the circuit because it's too risky for them. But still sometimes you hear some stroies from the city about police arrested prostitutes and "tourists" around the time of the GP. It's less dangereous for both parties to hide in dense populated places in apartments.TAG wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 00:51Which is why GPs like Turke & India when it was on the calendar and current Middle East venues like Bahrain when half the seats are empty are always difficult to process. Whether lack of money from local fans to attend or lack of interest yet there's still a GP there because of the oil money. I mean the only reason I can think as to why there's a Bahrain GP is due to the McLaren ownership.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 00:06Silverstone general admission this year was about £180, going up to nearly £500 for the best grandstand...
Anyway back to Hungary... anyone with some nice anecdotal stories of rampant prostitution around this circuit? I've heard stuff but never actually had anyone confirm first hand. I mean just out of curiosity of course.
Well check the nr. 9 - from 29 seconds onwards.F1Krof wrote: ↑01 Aug 2019, 23:09This... and furthermore, not to mention he fakktup Grosjean's pit stop as well.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2019, 22:51It was a disgrace, only without consequences because LEC did not finish anyway. Imagine if he had won and this would have been the deciding factor.iotar__ wrote: ↑01 Aug 2019, 22:45BREAKING NEWS, BREAKTHROUGH IN F1's PENALTY SYSTEM. https://www.motorsportweek.com/news/id/23913 "Stewards to impose time penalties for unsafe releases"
Well no s..., water is wet as well. They're pretending as if was some uncertain area that needed their damn reconsideration. Shameless favouritism is swept under the carpet as clarification. Team fine or time penalty, decisions, decisions. Who would have thought it was a time penalty to begin with.
Let's call a spade spade. This is basically open admission to cheating: yes we did it but only once. Only in F1 bizarro world. You want Ferrari to win one race, make 15 s pitstop by "mistake" when they're second, like RB's open gift in Barcelona 201x .
Indeed. Hamilton himself mentioned it in the interviews after Qualy for a start.NathanOlder wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 08:52They informed us before the race in Germany. So they would probably do the same this weekend. No excuse --- last weekend I'm afraid buddy.iotar__ wrote: ↑01 Aug 2019, 18:01If Hamilton is not well again it would be better if they informed about it before the race . If they do it afterwards it may be considered an excuse.
Can't wait for another team fine for unsafe release. That's F1 for you, you can buy yourself unsafe behaviour as long as you're Ferrari.
Yeah- he had a bit of a sore throat, well ‘boohoo’..Restomaniac wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 10:47Indeed. Hamilton himself mentioned it in the interviews after Qualy for a start.NathanOlder wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 08:52They informed us before the race in Germany. So they would probably do the same this weekend. No excuse --- last weekend I'm afraid buddy.iotar__ wrote: ↑01 Aug 2019, 18:01
If Hamilton is not well again it would be better if they informed about it before the race . If they do it afterwards it may be considered an excuse.
Can't wait for another team fine for unsafe release. That's F1 for you, you can buy yourself unsafe behaviour as long as you're Ferrari.
Not saying it is true, but the son of the FIA president being the manager of one the top drivers does indeed feel uneasy. Are we going to get new Balestre situations in the future with Max being in the Senna role (constantly screwed politically, perhaps by introducing rules favoruble to Ferrari and disadvantage for RB) and Leclerc being in the Prost role (getting constant favors) when these two really start battling it out for the championships?Espresso wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 09:33Well check the nr. 9 - from 29 seconds onwards.
First onboard LeClerc, then onboard Grosjean.
If Grosjean didn't pull an emergency break in the fast lane. Grosjean would have sidewalled LeClerc and scooped up a whole Red Bull crew in the process
And they were lucky there was nobody behind Grosjean at that moment. That would have become another pile up.
IMHO is just shows the influence of Nicolas Todt, Son of FIA president Jean Todt.
LeClerc shoved into Ferrari where they start to build the team around him.
Stewards starting to make decision pro-LeClerc.
Because of some nice excuses from the FIA...(Stewards should have seen Grosjean's onboard..) they went ahead with this obvious biased pitstop decision failure. No other words then...to obvious for the world to see that decision was sooo wrong...
And when Max protested (as only driver) FIA ridiculed him,
Max hit Bottas...na na na....LeClerc hit none...yeah yeah yeah....
... that went fine for a short moment until the world fell upon the FIA as Max's wording opened up hell gate to pit stops....
Finally FIA (were forced and) turned it around in an odd way and will start to penalize it...without giving in and/or admitting there mistake (or deliberate decision)? Major flaw. I'm missing Charlie majorly........
How much more of a soap serie can we expect?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg-CLxE2-PQ
Bottas hadnt had any running. The W10 seems to be well clear to be honest