That bodes really well for Mercedes!
That bodes really well for Mercedes!
That’s literally the case every race weekend.godlameroso wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 17:00We can't tell anything from either FP session. We don't know fuel loads, engine settings, we know that it's close between the top 3.
Ok, I see how I caused this issue. Let me solve this by bringing in an independent person; she is extra good with dogs!
Indeed, and in this case you dont need an engineering degree to see the W10 is simply fasterzibby43 wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 19:01That’s literally the case every race weekend.godlameroso wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 17:00We can't tell anything from either FP session. We don't know fuel loads, engine settings, we know that it's close between the top 3.
However, outlets such as AMuS talk to the teams’ engineers, and they have GPS data and other tools that take into account competitors’ engine modes and fuel loads.
Long-run pace almost always ends up being a strong predictor of weekend form. The lack of representative running in FP2 makes assessing form more difficult, for sure.
In the meantime, judging by Hamilton’s pace on a harder compound in FP2 and his pace on old softs in the AM, and knowing Merc’s history of running heavy fuel with lower engine modes, I think it’s safe to expect more from them.
So if Spec 1 Honda is 1 second behind spec 1 Merc and Spec 3 honda is .5 behind spec 2 Merc. That means the gap between Gasly's long run could be a little closer no? Obviously it is not apple to apple as car has improved over the season and condition continue to change but I do think based on what we saw last 3 races, Lewis gets pole and walk away but second Merc can be challenged by Lec and Max, maybe even Vet.zibby43 wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 19:01That’s literally the case every race weekend.godlameroso wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 17:00We can't tell anything from either FP session. We don't know fuel loads, engine settings, we know that it's close between the top 3.
However, outlets such as AMuS talk to the teams’ engineers, and they have GPS data and other tools that take into account competitors’ engine modes and fuel loads.
Long-run pace almost always ends up being a strong predictor of weekend form. The lack of representative running in FP2 makes assessing form more difficult, for sure.
In the meantime, judging by Hamilton’s pace on a harder compound in FP2 and his pace on old softs in the AM, and knowing Merc’s history of running heavy fuel with lower engine modes, I think it’s safe to expect more from them.
I think you are doing Seb a disservice. He seems to be the more comfortable Ferrari so far this weekend.rogazilla wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 20:49So if Spec 1 Honda is 1 second behind spec 1 Merc and Spec 3 honda is .5 behind spec 2 Merc. That means the gap between Gasly's long run could be a little closer no? Obviously it is not apple to apple as car has improved over the season and condition continue to change but I do think based on what we saw last 3 races, Lewis gets pole and walk away but second Merc can be challenged by Lec and Max, maybe even Vet.zibby43 wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 19:01That’s literally the case every race weekend.godlameroso wrote: ↑02 Aug 2019, 17:00We can't tell anything from either FP session. We don't know fuel loads, engine settings, we know that it's close between the top 3.
However, outlets such as AMuS talk to the teams’ engineers, and they have GPS data and other tools that take into account competitors’ engine modes and fuel loads.
Long-run pace almost always ends up being a strong predictor of weekend form. The lack of representative running in FP2 makes assessing form more difficult, for sure.
In the meantime, judging by Hamilton’s pace on a harder compound in FP2 and his pace on old softs in the AM, and knowing Merc’s history of running heavy fuel with lower engine modes, I think it’s safe to expect more from them.