You forget ClarkPyrone89 wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 13:44Also a good one, true. Especially with so many teams and in a time basically every few races drivers died.
Basically Senna (driver ability but career cut short), Fangio (as mentioned) or Schumacher (not so much stats but what he did with a team that was in shambles mid nineties). Lewis could join that list for me if he goes to a struggling team and get them championships against the odds.
I made the point earlier that at best you can therefore call someone the Greatest of his Generation at best in F1. In other sports such as American Football it is a lot easier as the game has stayed the same and the material they use also is equal and not different (offcourse they use better shoes now and better materials but that is not the defining element and they all use the exact same stuff anyway).Wynters wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 15:25You forget ClarkPyrone89 wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 13:44Also a good one, true. Especially with so many teams and in a time basically every few races drivers died.
Basically Senna (driver ability but career cut short), Fangio (as mentioned) or Schumacher (not so much stats but what he did with a team that was in shambles mid nineties). Lewis could join that list for me if he goes to a struggling team and get them championships against the odds.
The 'struggling' team thing is a bit of a tough bar though, isn't it? Is it even possible, especially with today's reliability? Senna didn't win any WDCs away from McLaren and he joined them for the '88 season, when the car won 15 out of 16 races. I'm not sure I see much of a struggle for the team.
Thinking back to Schumacher, he didn't win a WDC until Benetton were very competitive. So competitive, in fact, that they were caught cheating and Schumacher himself was later DSQed twice in that season and had to crash into Hill during the last race to make sure he won (it's been a while so I'm happy to be corrected if I recall incorrectly).
I'm also not sure the Mercedes was dominant in 2013, when Hamilton joined. Didn't they finish over 230 points behind RBR, even though Hamilton won a race with it?
---
We've been lucky enough to have several outstanding drivers, spread across many different eras. Direct comparison is pointless. If you put Fangio in today's Mercedes, I'm not convinced he would win. If you put Schumacher in Fangio's Alfa, I'm equally unconvinced he would be dominant.
I don't know why people feel this need to demand that a driver be declared the 'Greatest of All Time'!!!!!!! or why others insist that some arbitrary achievement is required to qualify. It's entirely subjective. I'm sure as the balance of power shifts in today's F1, that Verstappen will be hailed as the new 'GoAT', just as Hamilton was, just as Vettel was, just as Schumcaher was, just as Senna was, etc, etc, etc. Those people won't be wrong, but they probably won't be right either.
This is true- but that goes for every team/driver combination.ubuysa wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 15:11I get it that you're a VER fan, and there is no doubt he is hugely talented and a future world champion, but I do think you're protesting too much. F1 is about the team getting the car over the line first, and today HAM and his team beat VER and his team.
Which of them is the better driver is moot, and neither I nor Mercedes will care as long as the Mercedes team keep getting HAM over the line first.
I really don't understand people in this forum. Y'all are intelligent because F1 is an incredibly technical sport. But then the bickering I am reading in the last few race threads is beyond ridiculous. I usually enjoy reading the thread after the race is over to see if I can pick up things that I may have missed that other members may have picked up but nothing of the sort other than my driver is better than your driver and people responding your driver is better because he has a better car. So incredibly lame.Bill_Kar wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 14:24Sadly a MM borefest showJuzh wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 14:17Motogpshamyakovic wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 14:16What a drive from Hamilton really enjoyed the race! hope for such races in the furture
BTW there is a 4 week gap until the next race, what shall we do until them?
Rewatching old seasons will do the job, as per tradition.
Qualifying suggests otherwise, I would have thought?drunkf1fan wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 14:51Yes the Red Bull was a faster car in Max's hands, but not in Gasly's.
If you have to drive on the limit to keep a faster car out of DRS then that's surely pressure, no? Or, once Hamilton pitted a second time, did Verstappen feel no pressure until the corner Hamilton over took him?drunkf1fan wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 14:51If the guy behind you is ~1 second behind and never gets close enough to force you to take defensive action then that's not a lot of pressure. Hamilton all over Max, forcing him to take inside lines to cover the next corner, to brake later and the car constantly getting partially alongside, a car behind that is clearly able to be pushed harder and closing a gap, that's pressure.
Apologies for missing it. I agree that 'GoHG' is probably the best that could be acclaimed.Pyrone89 wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 15:28I made the point earlier that at best you can therefore call someone the Greatest of his Generation at best in F1. In other sports such as American Football it is a lot easier as the game has stayed the same and the material they use also is equal and not different (offcourse they use better shoes now and better materials but that is not the defining element and they all use the exact same stuff anyway).
It'll probably bring out the worst in some of their respective fans, sadly.Zarathustra wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 15:32
It doesn’t matter if you’re a ‘Hamboy’ or a ‘Maxipad’- this ‘little rivalry’ between the two of them will only bring out the best in both of them.
You misinterpreted my comment, maybe I didn't help with that.digitalrurouni wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 15:36I really don't understand people in this forum. Y'all are intelligent because F1 is an incredibly technical sport. But then the bickering I am reading in the last few race threads is beyond ridiculous. I usually enjoy reading the thread after the race is over to see if I can pick up things that I may have missed that other members may have picked up but nothing of the sort other than my driver is better than your driver and people responding your driver is better because he has a better car. So incredibly lame.
And the other thing that bugs me is the above comment. It's not up to Marc to slow down or Honda to stop relentless development and the same can be applied to the F1 side of things. It's not Mercedes's job to slow down for the rest of the field. The rest of the field can catch up. The rest of the drivers can step up their game. Max and Honda and Red Bull have been doing just that. So have McLaren and their drivers.
Stop being so whiny and enjoy the damn sports!!!
/rant
On the first part, no, qualifying is qualifying, it's the pace you can achieve in clean air with zero racing. Race pace is... your pace in a race, lap after lap including with traffic. Most drivers have significant differences between qualifying single lap pace and race pace, mixing them up helps no one. Qualifying for the most part completely excludes tire wear, race pace doesn't and it absolutely excludes following closely or being blocked.Wynters wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 15:37Qualifying suggests otherwise, I would have thought?drunkf1fan wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 14:51Yes the Red Bull was a faster car in Max's hands, but not in Gasly's.
If you have to drive on the limit to keep a faster car out of DRS then that's surely pressure, no? Or, once Hamilton pitted a second time, did Verstappen feel no pressure until the corner Hamilton over took him?
Also, I don't remember Hamilton's car being 'constantly...partially alongside'. It was a 70 lap race, I recall Hamilton being alongside on three laps, including the one he overtook. I'm happy to hear if he was alongside more, but you'll have a hard time convincing me that it was 'constantly'.
At least there was a championship battle. I vaguely recall being bored out of my mind during the 2002 and 2004 seasons.
The part where Ricciardo was in front of them was just at the point where Max made a mistake under pressure. He lost at least half a second in turn 12 alone. He wasnt stuck behind Ricciardo when he did, he was approaching Ricciardo, then lost half a second that let Lewis get right on Max's rear and when they got to the run down the straight, Max having DRS from Ricciardo saved Max's ass at that moment.Sieper wrote: ↑05 Aug 2019, 15:09It was actually the one lap that Max got a little bit held up by Ricciardo at the chicane that Hamilton was that close that he could make his attempt, which was a very nice battle with much respect between both. I thought Hamilton had already gotten Verstappen there (were it not for the marbles he would have).