Wasn't even aware of this reg. Cooler fuel temp = better performance ?santos wrote: ↑20 Sep 2019, 13:25https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/hami ... s/4544393/
11 degrees bellow the ambient temperature... Must have been Kimi that throwed an icecream to Hamilton's car.
Maybe they keep the engine temperature betterBill_Kar wrote: ↑20 Sep 2019, 13:32Wasn't even aware of this reg. Cooler fuel temp = better performance ?santos wrote: ↑20 Sep 2019, 13:25https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/hami ... s/4544393/
11 degrees bellow the ambient temperature... Must have been Kimi that throwed an icecream to Hamilton's car.
Yeah, that is what I thought as well. To what degree I have no idea but it has to be very marginal.HPD wrote: ↑20 Sep 2019, 13:36Maybe they keep the engine temperature betterBill_Kar wrote: ↑20 Sep 2019, 13:32Wasn't even aware of this reg. Cooler fuel temp = better performance ?santos wrote: ↑20 Sep 2019, 13:25https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/hami ... s/4544393/
11 degrees bellow the ambient temperature... Must have been Kimi that throwed an icecream to Hamilton's car.
IMO it has nothing to do with engine temperature (the effect of the fuel temp. on this matter should be negligible). It has to to with max fuel flow. In the regs this is limited at 100 kg/h if i am not mistaken but in reality it is measured real time as a fuel volume flow rate I think. The mass flow is than depending on the density of the fuel which is influenced by the temperature.Jester Maroc wrote: ↑20 Sep 2019, 13:46Yeah, that is what I thought as well. To what degree I have no idea but it has to be very marginal.
So with lower temps they can increase the volume of fuel at a given moment? Isn't that the reason why they use "Mass Flow" sensors to monitor fuel delivery?Midi wrote: ↑20 Sep 2019, 14:00IMO it has nothing to do with engine temperature (the effect of the fuel temp. on this matter should be negligible). It has to to with max fuel flow. In the regs this is limited at 100 kg/h if i am not mistaken but in reality it is measured real time as a fuel volume flow rate I think. The mass flow is than depending on the density of the fuel which is influenced by the temperature.Jester Maroc wrote: ↑20 Sep 2019, 13:46Yeah, that is what I thought as well. To what degree I have no idea but it has to be very marginal.