Come now, you didn't see this coming?
Come now, you didn't see this coming?
I broke away from the Condor strat, and just moved into 6 week calls when the seriousness became apparent.
Let's hope there's no panic in the Netherlands by then. Currently, it's a mixed bag. Most people out on the street/interviewed in the news don't seem to bother and the statement "it's just an overpowered flu" comes by quite a lot. There's currently one confirmed case in my hometown, but it's as crowded on the streets as normal.fritticaldi wrote: ↑01 Mar 2020, 23:18Now that the Qatar MotoGP race is cancelled it is widely expected that the F1 Bahrein GP which is close geographically to Qatar to be dropped as well. I predict the 2020 F1 season will begin in Europe at the Dutch GP in Zandvoort .
I was replying to adrianjordan's claim that the flu (specifically Influenza A) has a fatality rate of 1-2%. From all links I found, the figure is 10-20 times lower (0.1% to 0.2%) and that's not even factoring in that many people who have/had the flu don't report it.Juzh wrote: ↑02 Mar 2020, 00:14googling for 5 seconds i get this:Phil wrote: ↑01 Mar 2020, 23:58Influenza A a fatality of 1% to 2% a year? I find that very hard to believe - from what i have seen and read it’s 10 to 20 times lower. How did you arrive at that figure anyway?adrianjordan wrote: ↑01 Mar 2020, 16:34Sorry, that is just wrong. The fatality rate for influenza A is between 1 and 2% each year. If you include the other strains of flu then that skews the figure.
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronav ... h-flu.htmlso 0.1% seems to be the norm, unless we're missing something majorIn the study published Feb. 18 in the China CDC Weekly, researchers found a death rate from COVID-19 to be around 2.3% in mainland China. That's much higher than the death rate linked to flu, which is typically around 0.1% in the U.S., according to The New York Times.
Even so, the death rate for COVID-19 varied by location and an individual’s age, among other factors. For instance, in Hubei Province, the epicenter of the outbreak, the death rate reached 2.9%; in other provinces of China, that rate was just 0.4%. In addition, older adults have been hit the hardest. The death rate soars to 14.8% in those 80 and older; among those ages 70 to 79, the COVID-19 death rate in China seems to be about 8%; it’s 3.6% for those ages 60 to 69; 1.3% for 50 to 59; 0.4% for the age group 40 to 49; and just 0.2% for people ages 10 to 39. Nobody 9 and under has died of this coronavirus to date.
With the current paranoia going on, at least in Switzerland, but I assume this applies for most countries, anyone showing even the slightest symptoms are reporting and getting themselves checked for COVID-19 infection. I therefore assume the COVID-19 numbers are more 'accurate' than common flu numbers simply because not everyone who has the flu actually reports it, goes to a doctor etc. They simply stay home and recover (without fear of dying from it).
I absolutely second that, and absolutely don't want to imply the mortality rate of COVID might be as low as the regular flu. Based on the best information currently available, it's certainly higher. My main point was that it's very difficult to assess how much higher as, despite all the efforts and panic, registration will not be 100% complete. Out of the 10 or 11 cases NL now has, some 3 seem to be 'inexplicable' in terms of contact to infected persons, which means there are (in this very limited set of patients) very likely unregistered cases. On the other hand, there are worldwide many ill persons that are dead nor recovered, which will also impact mortality (do you calculate dead/total or dead/healed?). Similar, the here-reported factor 10 uncertainty in the mortality of the flu could very well stem from one source solely counting registered cases, while another might estimate total cases.Phil wrote: ↑02 Mar 2020, 13:20With the current paranoia going on, at least in Switzerland, but I assume this applies for most countries, anyone showing even the slightest symptoms are reporting and getting themselves checked for COVID-19 infection. I therefore assume the COVID-19 numbers are more 'accurate' than common flu numbers simply because not everyone who has the flu actually reports it, goes to a doctor etc. They simply stay home and recover (without fear of dying from it).
They haven’t even managed to reschedule 1 race, let alone many
I also wonder what's the point of moving. At this moment, the outbreak is too unpredictable to move races. The new destination may just as well be an issue in a months time or so, while a currently contaminated region could be clean by the time the circus arrives. And while there are good reasons to assume the virus is temperature sensitive, I'm not sure if that aspect has been sufficiently confirmed to inform alterations to the calendar. At this point it's just shooting in the dark for any race - whether it concerns keeping, moving or cancelling. Best thing to me just seems to keep preparing, unless there's a really good reason not to (for example, if the place is still a hotbed within two weeks of lights out)the EDGE wrote: ↑02 Mar 2020, 15:38They haven’t even managed to reschedule 1 race, let alone many
It’s not just a case of changing the dates, hotels & transport etc. Has to be booked well in advance along and the biggest headache is spectators who again have booked travel & hotels etc. Who won’t get a penny back for this so would have to pay twice