JPBD1990 wrote: ↑05 Mar 2020, 15:28
Xwang wrote: ↑05 Mar 2020, 15:21
JPBD1990 wrote: ↑05 Mar 2020, 15:07
And for the record, I’m a Ferrari fan.
It’s clear that Ferrari settled to prevent eventual litigation against them, indicating they knew what they were doing was in breach of the regulations.
If that wasn’t the case, they would have a thousand lawyers knocking down the FIA’s door for daring to suggest they were guilty while having no evidence to support it.
Again, I’m a Ferrari fan - but a settlement should not have been possible. I would have stuck by Ferrari even if they got sanctioned for cheating (rightly, if that’s the case). This is worse.
You are at home alone with your beloved black cat. Guards raid and accuse you of being a wizard. You say you are not, but they continue to be convinced that you are even after checking around several times and without finding any evidence.
They then tell you either kill the cat or go to the stake without any proof. What would you do? If you decide to kill the cat does it mean that you are really a wizard?
If Ferrari believes they’ve done nothing wrong, then Ferrari’s lawyers will be about to bring all sorts of pain upon the FIA for saying in a public statement:
"The extensive and thorough investigations undertaken during the 2019 season raised suspicions that the Scuderia Ferrari PU could be considered as not operating within the limits of the FIA regulations at all times.”
Innocent until proven guilty, right? The FIA couldn’t prove guilt - so the above is awfully inflammatory and burgeoning on defamation IF Ferrari is committed to a position of 100% innocence.
There are many people who have gone to court convinced of their case but who have ended up losing. Being confident you are right is in no way the same as being confident a court will see things your way.
It should be obvious by now that this is a hugely complex situation (in terms of the tech involved). It's by no means certain that a court would be able to field any technically competent experts who actually understand this stuff properly and if they won't be able to understand it fully (and, after all, it looks like the FIA doesn't either) then would Ferrari want to gamble on a layman giving a proper verdict? Settling at least provides some safeguards.
Only lawyers are sure of winning (their fees) when they go to court!