https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/2022 ... 0/4775364/
This is reasonable.
It is reasonable. But how will the FIA police it? How will they know if a team is doing work on the forthcoming regulation change cars?Sevach wrote: β01 Apr 2020, 01:18https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/2022 ... 0/4775364/
This is reasonable.
It will be really tough to enforce. I guess the only thing that will hold teams back would be the possibility of their members moving to another team and spilling the beans.Just_a_fan wrote: β01 Apr 2020, 11:06It is reasonable. But how will the FIA police it? How will they know if a team is doing work on the forthcoming regulation change cars?Sevach wrote: β01 Apr 2020, 01:18https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/2022 ... 0/4775364/
This is reasonable.
it sounds reasonable on the surface but i don't see which costs are going to get saved. Staff have to be paid and so do rents and everything, they'll still be busy doing car developing things, running their wind tunnels and computers and workshops, making models. They're not laying people off are they? Anybody understand? It must just mean the 2020/1 cars will be superdeveloped virtually instead of the 2022 carsSevach wrote: β01 Apr 2020, 01:18https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/2022 ... 0/4775364/
This is reasonable.
what a terrible idea. all these 'frozen' parts is a big step towards spec parts, and anyway how does it reduce costs? Can someone explain? The same number of staff, same buildings, facilities, same new wings, floors, energy bill... what's cheaper? Where do the savings come from? what is it they have to buy less of?FrukostScones wrote: β01 Apr 2020, 16:02new Regs postponed to 2023?
AMUS:
https://translate.google.com/translate? ... ed-bull%2F
I'm not sure, but honestly, with the new Threadripper and Instinct chips, you can put about 50 TFLOPS in a home desktop now. You would already need to go door-to-door to properly police the CFD rule.
I thought the teams run semi-bespoke CFD software these days. Would they accept going to a standard supplier? How would they ensure that no-one's data/models slipped out and were seen by other teams? Or do you means they'd each have their own servers but have a central monitoring system?Zynerji wrote: β01 Apr 2020, 17:25I'm not sure, but honestly, with the new Threadripper and Instinct chips, you can put about 50 TFLOPS in a home desktop now. You would already need to go door-to-door to properly police the CFD rule.
I think the real answer is to move towards a CFD computer sponsor (like the Pirelli model) and have that sponsor keep a computational power balance between the teams without limiting the overall power with some arbitrary number.
LH 9XWDC confimed.FrukostScones wrote: β01 Apr 2020, 16:02new Regs postponed to 2023?
AMUS:
https://translate.google.com/translate? ... ed-bull%2F