Electric motors are much quieter, and it sounds like it’s deploying ERS very little at all. It didn’t sound like that in testing either, which is why I think they had serious problems with the system.
Not only top speed, but acceleration was significantly better after the last two restarts, after they had plenty of time to recharge the batteries. Just look at how Leclerc got past Norris. Little to do with traction or tyre wear since they pitted at the same time and Norris also got fastest lap at the end.timbo wrote: ↑06 Jul 2020, 15:29The maximum speeds in the race are much better than in Qualy. Sure, it should be helped by slipstreaming, but that should affect other cars too. Can it be that they can't charge the battery fully during the out lap? Anyway, judging by the maximum speeds in the race and qualifying it seems they are mostly hurt in the latter.
Do You maybe have some inside info...?ScrewCaptain27 wrote: ↑06 Jul 2020, 16:09Electric motors are much quieter, and it sounds like it’s deploying ERS very little at all. It didn’t sound like that in testing either, which is why I think they had serious problems with the system.
I believe they can develop as much as they want, they just can't use the new stuff until next season.
Mudflap wrote: ↑15 Dec 2019, 20:35I am also told that, while not directly accusing Ferrari of cheating, Andy Cowell declared in the last post-race debrief that they are expecting Ferrari to take a significant step back for 2020 and they now consider RBR Honda their main competitor for the next season.
Certainly better but most tracks aren't like this.
Another thing which makes me wonder is why Binotto continuously insisted on the PU to be legal at any time until the very end of the season.MtthsMlw wrote: ↑07 Jul 2020, 19:37Certainly better but most tracks aren't like this.
Come to think about it, Ferrari knew since November that they might loose their advantage and should have anticipated that this day could come at any time if they really tricked around. Makes me wonder how they decided between the current aero concept (max. downforce but draggy) or continuing with the low drag lower downforce one.
They went in the right direction, that low drag concept where they lost a second to their competitors in the corners would've made this season even uglier than it is, that's before we mention the bad tyre management and awful race pace. This season was a lose-lose after the engine saga and clarificationsMtthsMlw wrote: ↑07 Jul 2020, 19:37Certainly better but most tracks aren't like this.
Come to think about it, Ferrari knew since November that they might loose their advantage and should have anticipated that this day could come at any time if they really tricked around. Makes me wonder how they decided between the current aero concept (max. downforce but draggy) or continuing with the low drag lower downforce one.
There's just no way to handle the situation well, if he admits they lost power it's "Binotto admits Ferrari cheated" headlines. Playing dumb looks dumb but it's the better of the 2 evils. In Austria he had to admit it because the speed trap and lap times made it impossible to deny, he did as well as he could