data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cf00/3cf005d4edd86a1d264bc04b228a34e2a53e5242" alt="Image"
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Yeah, I heard that too (after I posted my initial question). I do wonder still if it is to the limit or not (Horner hinted at an extreme for the Renault), and if Carlos was talking especially about his car (sector times hint at that, given Norris’ S2 times)martinbeiker wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 17:17Carlos said in his post qualifying interview that rain would hinder them, as they set up the car for a completely dry race.
Something doesn't make sense. They are clearly running more downforce than Renaultmartinbeiker wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 17:17Carlos said in his post qualifying interview that rain would hinder them, as they set up the car for a completely dry race.
Thanks for the video and information!Juzh wrote:mclaren is definitely running more downforce oriented setup. Carlos even managed to beat everyone on pouhon apex speed, which is quite incredible. Almost flat trough turn 7 (malmedy), higher speed than verstappen.
Their problem is low speed corners, 11 kmh down on verstappen trough bruxelles. Verstappen able to carry tighter line, compared to carlos who drifts wide and loses quite a lot of time there.
q3 lap 1.42.438
https://streamable.com/0ce8y2
I wonder why they keep insisting they don't have the setup geared towards rain even when it's clear they had a high df config.martinbeiker wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 17:17Carlos said in his post qualifying interview that rain would hinder them, as they set up the car for a completely dry race.
Sure was, I’m really looking forward to seeing what he can do with the McLaren Mercedes car next year, that’s gonna be awesome!
Zac hinted as much at the end of last year, but not sure how serious the comment was.Ground Effect wrote: ↑30 Aug 2020, 10:20I wonder if McLaren seriously consider Pato O’ Ward a future F1 prospect. He’s just a couple of months older than Lando, doing a good job in IndyCar. I know it doesn’t automatically translate to being a good F1 driver, but Red Bull had him in their driver programme with this in mind. Too bad McLaren don’t have a B team
It's always good to have young talent in the pipeline, but I think that they need a strong Indy program too, they should keep O'Ward there. NOR, RIC is a top combination in and outside of the track they are both fast and good for sponsors too (commercial benefits).Chalke wrote: ↑30 Aug 2020, 11:44Zac hinted as much at the end of last year, but not sure how serious the comment was.Ground Effect wrote: ↑30 Aug 2020, 10:20I wonder if McLaren seriously consider Pato O’ Ward a future F1 prospect. He’s just a couple of months older than Lando, doing a good job in IndyCar. I know it doesn’t automatically translate to being a good F1 driver, but Red Bull had him in their driver programme with this in mind. Too bad McLaren don’t have a B team
"While the projects are separate, they complement each other commercially and we don't have a young driver under contract for 2020," he said. "So I wouldn't be surprised to see one of those guys in one of our F1 cars around a rookie test."
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/mcla ... w/4591229/
In 2020 running Norris, O'Ward and Askew that's some young talent in race seats.
Mid 1:50s similar ballpark to Renaults and Racing point of stroll (Perez was quite a bit faster, with fewer laps though) .