PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑04 Nov 2020, 19:35
SiLo wrote: ↑04 Nov 2020, 16:00
PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑04 Nov 2020, 15:56
Hhm. Aldo Costa was the architect of the teams current "model of sustainability" for lack of a better term. He recently commented that this model was doubted by others, but once it was put in practice they saw that it was the best decision. He went on to say that once that sustainability model is in place, there is a strong chance Mercedes will be at the front even if a different leader is there.
I guess the model sorts of guides the policies and by extent what sort of phiosphy is required of the leader too.
I'd love to know more about this
https://www.gazzetta.it/Auto/03-11-2020 ... 2127.shtml
“We had signs on which to put projects and ambitions, I wrote that we should not think of winning a title, but of winning many. It wasn't a brag, it's just that these are objectives that require completely different organizational processes ”.
When Costa talks about "values we have built", then he is referring to what he calls "a cultural question that in my opinion is the basis of all great sporting successes. In this, Mercedes is like the All Blacks: people pass, the culture they built remains. And it gets stronger. " It sounds rhetorical. Yet that's what all the men on the team repeat, starting with Lewis Hamilton. "But in Mercedes they are happy that others believe it rhetoric, so they don't imitate it," laughs Costa. "And that culture that the walls of Brackley are imbued with is transmitted." True, because Paddy Lowe is gone, Costa is out, at the end of 2020 he will leave Andy Cowell. Wolff himself portends a disengagement: "Whoever goes prepares the future, grows successors in the same philosophy. It is also a way of adapting to the vicissitudes of life. And that's why I keep imagining a very strong Mercedes. And I don't see who will be able to stop it. "
Well put, and very interesting, and sort of ties in with with the article I came in here to post:
The Race - How Mercedes designed f1s best car but kept it secret:
“That car was the first car to have everything done the right way,” says chief designer John Owen.
“We had the structures, the right people in the right places, and a single-minded philosophy of how we were going to approach the car and all its challenges and complexities.” ... The W04 is Owen’s favourite Mercedes, a car that represented a massive breakthrough. Though it had “lots of detail that’s just the right compromise on all the right things and the round the back end it’s a proper step forward”, there were bits that “we didn’t get around to finish”.
Owen says that during 2012, the various elements of the car – tyres, aerodynamics, engines, trackside inputs, driver input – were still competing with one another. Various points were being made in the pursuit of improving individual areas while the global picture was ignored.
...
Mercedes’ solution was to establish the Performance Group, which comprised the key performance members of the team. That would prioritise the pursuit of one direction, right or wrong. If it was right it worked well. If it was wrong, it was a lesson learned.
“We just got together and agreed what we were going to do amongst ourselves, we had tough conversations, and we all worked together, four or five of us, what we were going to do and how we were going to go forward,” says Owen.
“At that moment it just got better, better, better. And that’s probably ground zero, and the 2013 car was the first product of that. It was a very useful statement of intent for the future.”
Really quite a nice article, some more tidbits:
Mercedes was privately quite pleased as it became clear Red Bull worked on its car to the end. Because once W04’s potential was clear, it had served its purpose and the 2013 season wasn’t the priority.
...
“We now know from people who were working at Red Bull in 2013 who have since joined us that the one thing that W04 did is put them under pressure to defend in 2013,” says Owen.
“It stopped them looking forward to 2014.
“That was actually really, really effective to make your competitor think you’re catching them and they have to also spend resources, while in reality we were fully on to 2014 with the engine and the chassis.”
It also sort of definitely answers the question to "were Mercedes sandbagging, until and after the Bahrain GP?" with a solid yes, and why:
If there was a tangible “epiphany” with the 2013 car it was that Mercedes understood how to make the tyres work for the first time ... although amusingly its confidence was not total, and the extent of its performance advantage after the rules changed was such that the drivers were taking it easy through the corners just to be safe.
“Even when we turned the engine down it still went very quickly down the straights, so we would often sort of pootle round the corners,” Owen admits.
“We were still a little bit nervous about our tyre life in those early years when we still weren’t fully on top of tyres.
So, worry about the tyres, but also strategy:
But Cowell insists Mercedes had a good idea of the ultimate potential of the package well before then.
“I think we already knew where we were, we just hadn’t shown it,” he says.
“We were spending more time working out what performance level we should run going into qualifying. We wanted to make sure we’re on the front row, but we didn’t want it to be too big a gap to the second row.
“James Vowles and myself spent a lot of time working out what mode should we run in, so we kind of knew where we were against the others, because we imagined they got it wound up to 11.”
...
The side-benefit to the performance of W05 not being stressed early on, in addition to making it easier to conserve the engine and tyres, was that Mercedes was able to validate that its car was “actually quite decent” without broadcasting that to the wider world.
And there was “no frustration” internally that the engine was winning the plaudits. Partly because Brackley recognised the brilliance of the product Brixworth created. But also because letting rivals think it was all the engine quickly became a deliberate ploy.
...
“Whereas the power unit, nobody really knows how the power unit is that powerful, what combustion technology you’ve got. They can only speculate. But it’s all inside the engine, there’s nothing you can see really on the outside.
“So, letting the other teams believe that it was all about the engine was something we were keen to do.
“For years people copied Red Bull aerodynamically, they all did a Red Bull copy and that suited us just fine. That was something we were quite keen to encourage and if that meant talking down the chassis and bigging up the engine then we were more than happy to do that.”
Makes you wonder what Newey thinks of that!