Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

Phil wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 13:00
Kingshark wrote:
21 Dec 2020, 06:33
As for Verstappen, we will have to wait and see on that one. He is still only 23 years old and has an entire career ahead of him. In my view he is a bigger talent Hamilton.
The thing that irks me about Verstappen, is that the only reference anyone has about the ability of a driver, is his direct performance against his team-mate. And considering that, the only driver he's driven against I rate as a somewhat known quantity is Ricciardo (who himself fared well against Seb in 2014) and Sainz. All the others have been subpar at best, so the whole record of beating his team-mates is as impressive as it has been for George Russel.

What I also think goes against Verstappen is that he seems to have quite a bit of favorable treatment at RedBull (for good reason, one has to say). But it still taints the picture somewhat, as much as it did Vettel when he was driving and dominating with RedBull back in the days.

Even so, it's indisputable that Verstappen is an extremely talented driver and in the last two season, he has also taken on the role as a teamleader impressively and delivered consistent and strong performance for the team with little to few mistakes. He is also very strong in cars that are difficult to drive and this is further underlined in the wet where he has historically performed above average. In fact, the only other driver on the current grid which I would attribute the same level of similar traits and talent is Hamilton, who has performed just as strongly in the wet and as consistent over the years even in bad cars. Small exception being that Hamilton has faced far stronger team-mates without the luxury of receiving beneficial treatment in any of his years or teams he has raced. But that would be comparing a 13 year career spanning two teams with a 6 year one at a single team.

Also the fact that Verstappen pretty much jumped into F1 without the luxury of having years of racing works for him, not against him. He is way more mature as a result of driving F1 for 6 years than any other driver jumping into a hot seat and being measured against a driver widely regarded as one of the best and a two times WDC champion to boot. Verstappen's biggest advantage is that he could easily become the driver with the most years in F1, given how early he entered. In fact, I see him as the only other driver with a real shot of coming close to Hamiltons records - given the right car and circumstance. He is only 23 years of age and could be easily looking at another 12-13 seasons until he reaches the age of Hamilton has now as the record holder of most stats with that many races and experience under his belt already.
I understand what you are saying, but even just against Gasly, how ever bad he was in the team, look at his driving since being dropped from the boss team. He is far from being a poor driver. And I do take on what you say about being favoured, but no secret is being made of it.

I am not a Max Evangelist, ot even in his top million fans, but I really do see something there.
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

User avatar
NathanOlder
48
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 10:05
Location: Kent

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

If some people are saying you can't use Max's first 2 or 3 years in F1, then that just means he wasn't ready for F1. Mx, Jos or RedBull are to blame for that one.
GoLandoGo
Lewis v2.0
King George has arrived.

New found love for GT racing with Assetto Corsa Competizione on PS5 & PC

ENGINE TUNER
ENGINE TUNER
25
Joined: 29 Nov 2016, 18:07

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

NathanOlder wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 15:47
If some people are saying you can't use Max's first 2 or 3 years in F1, then that just means he wasn't ready for F1. Mx, Jos or RedBull are to blame for that one.
He wasn't ready, in 2019 he caused 10 collisions. 2020 was his first clean season. The FIA are at fault for letting in these underdeveloped drivers. Only the top 2 or 3 F2 drivers should be eligible for a F1 super license. Absolutely nobody should be allowed to skip f2 into f3, regardless of how much money or "talent" or "potential" they have.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

NathanOlder wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 15:47
If some people are saying you can't use Max's first 2 or 3 years in F1, then that just means he wasn't ready for F1. Mx, Jos or RedBull are to blame for that one.
Exactly. He was in the car and therefore is there to be judged against his peers. Unless we get to choose only the good years when comparing drivers, in which case every world champion is the equal GOAT! :lol:
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

grubschumi13
grubschumi13
1
Joined: 06 Jul 2020, 17:34

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

From 2010 - 2013. F1 was competitive, Hamilton could not win a title during this period despite having a competitive car.

2010
5 different race winners (Multiple race winners each of these 5 winners won more than 1 race this season)
5 wins Mclaren (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2017 where people said Seb should have won the title and that the season was competitive)
5 Wins Ferrari
9 wins RBR

2011
5 different race winners
6 wins Mclaren (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2018 where people said Seb should have won the title and that this season was competitive)
1 Wins Ferrari
9 wins RBR

2012
8 different winners
6 wins Mclaren (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2018 where people said Seb should have won the title)
3 Wins Ferrari
6 wins RBR
1 Win Lotus
1 win Williams
1 win Mercedes

2013
5 Different race winners
3 wins Mercedes (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2019 where people said Ferrari had the fastest car)
2 Wins Ferrari
13 wins RBR
1 win Lotus

The point here is when F1 was competitive, equal un-reliability and multiple cars closer on pace. In other words unpredictability Hamilton could not win. Seb faced many more rivals, more unpredictability, There was no certainty in any race.

From 2014 Mercedes was so far ahead and Hamilton was strong because of one factor- Predictability. 2014 - 2016 it was predictable who his main competitor was in each race. There was only one Rosberg. So beat Rosberg and you win the race. unreliability is the only possible factor to interfere with predictability but Mercedes have been incredibly reliable and has made Hamilton in terms of statistics Hamilton the champion with the least unreliability: https://www.racefans.net/2016/10/03/ham ... -champion/

From 2017 - 2018 again predictability but now with a "wingman" Toto's words not mine - Beat Vettel. You did not have to win the race Just beat Vettel and you would be world champion. Don't worry about Kimi, or Bottas these were No. 2 drivers, their strategies were often trashed to help the No.1 driver win. Mercedes had the pace over Ferrari this season enough that Kimi could not act as a spoiler for Hamilton and enough pace advantage for Bottas to act as a spoiler for Vettel more often than Kimi could for Hamilton as Bottas did in Austria, Russia when Hamilton not in the running for the win and in Spain, GB, Italy and Baku to take places off Seb. Kimi only managed to be a spoiler for Hamilton in Hungary and Monaco.

2019-2020 again predictability more so because his rival was his "wingman" - Beat Bottas and you are world champion. I say more so because Mercedes spend half a billion dollars each year in this sport. They don't do this for the fan's entertainment and that this half a billion is Mercedes' entertainment budget for F1 fans worldwide. They do so to market. Our entertainment is merely a byproduct of their marketing. It is a lot of money to spend to let the fates decide who is going to be their marketing face. If anything went badly wrong for Hamilton in these two seasons that made Bottas a real threat, no doubt the dark corporate hand will intervene to put things right. Mansell put it better than me:
https://talksport.com/sport/motorsport/ ... 911113140/

In 2010-2013 there were too many other race capable winning cars (on raw pace) and enough un-reliability to just be able to name a single rival and as in beat Vettel and you win the race because Alonso, Kimi, Jenson and Mark in some cases Kimi in the lotus were in cars that could win the race too all doing different strategies some long, some undercutting. This was worse in 2012 when we had 7 winners in 7 races.

Hamilton at the moment has the most predictable environment of any driver in F1. For 7 of the last 7 have been very predictable, way more predictable than Vettels' 4

I remember Alonso in 2010-2011 when he tried to add a level of predictability because fighting for the title in those days was a moving target. Alonso believed to win the title, his goal needs to be podiums: https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/86886 ... -win-title
This is why he came so close to the title in 2 of the 4 seasons and finished 3rd in 3 of the 4. He added this layer of predictability.

and https://www.f1-fansite.com/f1-news/alon ... 012-title/ - equal unreliability I spoke of in this article he warns that while podiums is the goal, if something goes wrong like a DNF in one of the races then the podium theory will fail.

Just my two cents.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

grubschumi13 wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 19:51
From 2010 - 2013. F1 was competitive, Hamilton could not win a title during this period despite having a competitive car.

2010
5 different race winners (Multiple race winners each of these 5 winners won more than 1 race this season)
5 wins Mclaren (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2017 where people said Seb should have won the title and that the season was competitive)
5 Wins Ferrari
9 wins RBR

2011
5 different race winners
6 wins Mclaren (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2018 where people said Seb should have won the title and that this season was competitive)
1 Wins Ferrari
9 wins RBR

2012
8 different winners
6 wins Mclaren (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2018 where people said Seb should have won the title)
3 Wins Ferrari
6 wins RBR
1 Win Lotus
1 win Williams
1 win Mercedes

2013
5 Different race winners
3 wins Mercedes (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2019 where people said Ferrari had the fastest car)
2 Wins Ferrari
13 wins RBR
1 win Lotus

The point here is when F1 was competitive, equal un-reliability and multiple cars closer on pace. In other words unpredictability Hamilton could not win. Seb faced many more rivals, more unpredictability, There was no certainty in any race.
In 2010, 2011 and 2012, the McLaren was driven by two world champions. The only team with two world champions in it and the only team that didn't favour one driver over another. Unlike Red Bull and Ferrari.

In 2010, the McLaren drivers had 2 wins to Button, 3 to Hamilton. In 3 of those races they finished 1-2. Alonso had 5 wins on his own, of course, but then he had a tame team mate - "Fernando is faster than you" - who wasn't really on his level anyway.

In 2011, Vettel was dominant and took all of the team's wins. The McLaren drivers took 3 each, Alonso only one. Webber didn't get a win. 2011 was Hamilton's worst season. But even Button, who finished 2nd in the title race was over 120 points behind Vettel. So really this season wasn't anyone other than Vettel's.

in 2012, Hamilton was taken out of three races by reliability and Hulkenberg when leading. He still took 4 wins to Button's 3. Give him back those three wins and Hamilton would have been champion that season. So I'd say that means he was competitive as a driver. He also had the same number of retirements as the rest of the top five put together. 10 retirements in the top 5 and he had 5 of them.

Vettel definitely had the best car in those years. That's fine - he got the car and he did the job and took the titles. That's what being a racing driver is all about.

But the point still remains that only Hamilton had a world champion as a team mate and had an even-handed team. Neither Vettel nor Alonso had that to deal with. So, no, Vettel didn't face more rivals.

In the period of 2010-2012, Hamilton had 11 retirements, Vettel had 5, Webber 5, Button 6 and Alonso 4. So Hamilton had much worse reliability than Vettel (or any of the others). So the argument about equal unreliability doesn't wash either.

In 2013, the Mercedes was not a championship capable car - it just wasn't. The Red Bull was head and shoulders above anything else - Vettel won 9 races on the bounce whilst his "not bad for a number 2" team mate failed to win a single race all season.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

bosyber
bosyber
45
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 22:41

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 21:11
grubschumi13 wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 19:51
lots of selectively presented data
In 2010, 2011 and 2012, the McLaren was driven by two world champions. The only team with two world champions in it and the only team that didn't favour one driver over another. Unlike Red Bull and Ferrari.

In 2010, the McLaren drivers had 2 wins to Button, 3 to Hamilton. In 3 of those races they finished 1-2. Alonso had 5 wins on his own, of course, but then he had a tame team mate - "Fernando is faster than you" - who wasn't really on his level anyway.

In 2011, Vettel was dominant and took all of the team's wins. The McLaren drivers took 3 each, Alonso only one. Webber didn't get a win. 2011 was Hamilton's worst season. But even Button, who finished 2nd in the title race was over 120 points behind Vettel. So really this season wasn't anyone other than Vettel's.

in 2012, Hamilton was taken out of three races by reliability and Hulkenberg when leading. He still took 4 wins to Button's 3. Give him back those three wins and Hamilton would have been champion that season. So I'd say that means he was competitive as a driver. He also had the same number of retirements as the rest of the top five put together. 10 retirements in the top 5 and he had 5 of them.

Vettel definitely had the best car in those years. That's fine - he got the car and he did the job and took the titles. That's what being a racing driver is all about.

But the point still remains that only Hamilton had a world champion as a team mate and had an even-handed team. Neither Vettel nor Alonso had that to deal with. So, no, Vettel didn't face more rivals.

In the period of 2010-2012, Hamilton had 11 retirements, Vettel had 5, Webber 5, Button 6 and Alonso 4. So Hamilton had much worse reliability than Vettel (or any of the others). So the argument about equal unreliability doesn't wash either.

In 2013, the Mercedes was not a championship capable car - it just wasn't. The Red Bull was head and shoulders above anything else - Vettel won 9 races on the bounce whilst his "not bad for a number 2" team mate failed to win a single race all season.
Good post, thanks for taking the trouble to give that context, which I didn't want to take the time/energy to do. Vettel surely had a great 4 years and making it as if Hamilton could and should have won but failed all on his own, that's just revisionist.

grubschumi13
grubschumi13
1
Joined: 06 Jul 2020, 17:34

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 21:11
grubschumi13 wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 19:51
From 2010 - 2013. F1 was competitive, Hamilton could not win a title during this period despite having a competitive car.

2010
5 different race winners (Multiple race winners each of these 5 winners won more than 1 race this season)
5 wins Mclaren (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2017 where people said Seb should have won the title and that the season was competitive)
5 Wins Ferrari
9 wins RBR

2011
5 different race winners
6 wins Mclaren (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2018 where people said Seb should have won the title and that this season was competitive)
1 Wins Ferrari
9 wins RBR

2012
8 different winners
6 wins Mclaren (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2018 where people said Seb should have won the title)
3 Wins Ferrari
6 wins RBR
1 Win Lotus
1 win Williams
1 win Mercedes

2013
5 Different race winners
3 wins Mercedes (This was as many as Ferrari had managed in 2019 where people said Ferrari had the fastest car)
2 Wins Ferrari
13 wins RBR
1 win Lotus

The point here is when F1 was competitive, equal un-reliability and multiple cars closer on pace. In other words unpredictability Hamilton could not win. Seb faced many more rivals, more unpredictability, There was no certainty in any race.
In 2010, 2011 and 2012, the McLaren was driven by two world champions. The only team with two world champions in it and the only team that didn't favour one driver over another. Unlike Red Bull and Ferrari.

In 2010, the McLaren drivers had 2 wins to Button, 3 to Hamilton. In 3 of those races they finished 1-2. Alonso had 5 wins on his own, of course, but then he had a tame team mate - "Fernando is faster than you" - who wasn't really on his level anyway.

In 2011, Vettel was dominant and took all of the team's wins. The McLaren drivers took 3 each, Alonso only one. Webber didn't get a win. 2011 was Hamilton's worst season. But even Button, who finished 2nd in the title race was over 120 points behind Vettel. So really this season wasn't anyone other than Vettel's.





In the period of 2010-2012, Hamilton had 11 retirements, Vettel had 5, Webber 5, Button 6 and Alonso 4. So Hamilton had much worse reliability than Vettel (or any of the others). So the argument about equal unreliability doesn't wash either.
Please notice I said equal unreliability not retirements. Of the 11 Retirements you speak of 4 Were technical issues:
Hungary 2010
Brazil 2011
Singapore 2012
Abu Dhabi 2012


The rest were crash related:

Italy 2010 clashed with Massa
Singapore 2010 Clashed with Webber
Canada 2011 Clashed with Button
Spa 2011 Clashed with Kobayashi
Germany 2012 Got a puncture and requested to retire the car.
Spa 2012 start line crash
Brazil 2012 Clashed with Hulkenberg.

You also make my point for me, two world champions in the team and no one was designated No. 1 added an extra layer of competition that I am speaking of. Hamilton was competing with Button, Alonso, Webber, Massa and Vettel. Five rivals instead of 1 he has enjoyed since 2014. If we had this many driver capable of winning more than 1 GP a season on raw pace even if Button, Alonso, Webber, Massa and Vettel each got 2 wins in a season this would be 10 GPs

Even if as you say Alonso and Vettel (I see no evidence of team orders with Vettel) were designated No.1 drivers they still had to compete with Hamilton, Button, Alonso and Massa, 3 drivers more than Hamilton has had to compete with in any of his Championship years.

Another thing tht points to my idea that Hamilton does not thrive in competitive environments or competitive eras is All team mates that could challenge Hamilton, he had failings out with. Alonso and Rosberg. All the team mates he likes are all push overs Kovalianen and Bottas

Praise of Kovalianen when it was clear to all his results were mideocre at best.
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/hami ... -7820.html

Hamilton said: “I've heard about it but I am very content with Heikki as my teammate. He is focused, friendly and very talented. He is very strong and is helping to move the team forwards. I enjoy working with him and I hope that he stays,”

Of Bottas:

https://drivetribe.com/p/hamilton-hails ... Uzy2r15Xbg

and:

https://gptoday.com/details/view/596706 ... s_praises/

Now both Alonso and Rosberg have had other team mates and I do not recall either falling out with any of them. The only one is Hamilton, he is the common denominator. Rosberg had Webber who beat him and was constantly competitive they never fell out.
Last edited by grubschumi13 on 23 Dec 2020, 01:13, edited 3 times in total.

grubschumi13
grubschumi13
1
Joined: 06 Jul 2020, 17:34

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

bosyber wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 22:13
Just_a_fan wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 21:11
grubschumi13 wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 19:51
lots of selectively presented data
In 2010, 2011 and 2012, the McLaren was driven by two world champions. The only team with two world champions in it and the only team that didn't favour one driver over another. Unlike Red Bull and Ferrari.

In 2010, the McLaren drivers had 2 wins to Button, 3 to Hamilton. In 3 of those races they finished 1-2. Alonso had 5 wins on his own, of course, but then he had a tame team mate - "Fernando is faster than you" - who wasn't really on his level anyway.

In 2011, Vettel was dominant and took all of the team's wins. The McLaren drivers took 3 each, Alonso only one. Webber didn't get a win. 2011 was Hamilton's worst season. But even Button, who finished 2nd in the title race was over 120 points behind Vettel. So really this season wasn't anyone other than Vettel's.

in 2012, Hamilton was taken out of three races by reliability and Hulkenberg when leading. He still took 4 wins to Button's 3. Give him back those three wins and Hamilton would have been champion that season. So I'd say that means he was competitive as a driver. He also had the same number of retirements as the rest of the top five put together. 10 retirements in the top 5 and he had 5 of them.

Vettel definitely had the best car in those years. That's fine - he got the car and he did the job and took the titles. That's what being a racing driver is all about.

But the point still remains that only Hamilton had a world champion as a team mate and had an even-handed team. Neither Vettel nor Alonso had that to deal with. So, no, Vettel didn't face more rivals.

In the period of 2010-2012, Hamilton had 11 retirements, Vettel had 5, Webber 5, Button 6 and Alonso 4. So Hamilton had much worse reliability than Vettel (or any of the others). So the argument about equal unreliability doesn't wash either.

In 2013, the Mercedes was not a championship capable car - it just wasn't. The Red Bull was head and shoulders above anything else - Vettel won 9 races on the bounce whilst his "not bad for a number 2" team mate failed to win a single race all season.
Good post, thanks for taking the trouble to give that context, which I didn't want to take the time/energy to do. Vettel surely had a great 4 years and making it as if Hamilton could and should have won but failed all on his own, that's just revisionist.
My point is not Hamilton failed on his own. The title of this forum is comparing Vettel's 4 to Hamilton's 6. I am arguing Hamilton's 6 were won in less competitive environments than Vettel's 4.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

Kingshark wrote:
21 Dec 2020, 06:33

Hamilton won 1 title in 7 years in the V8 era. Successful? Sure, but not dominant. Mercedes dominance in the hybrid era has given Hamilton an aura of invincibility that is mostly unwarranted.

As for Verstappen, we will have to wait and see on that one. He is still only 23 years old and has an entire career ahead of him. In my view he is a bigger talent Hamilton. Will that translate into incredible success? Depends if he is lucky enough to end up in the best cars.
Remember....
Max was pretty close to Sainz in his first year.
Max got beaten by Daniel two years in a row.

How do you compare that to Lewis in his first years? No comparison basically. One can argue that Max is less talented and more a manufactured soldier. Raised from birth by a F1 driver father to serve one purpose only. To dominate when he gets to F1.

Did you watch the Max Verstappen documentary? It is in Dutch though... But.. Watch it!
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

ENGINE TUNER
ENGINE TUNER
25
Joined: 29 Nov 2016, 18:07

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

grubschumi13 wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 23:54
bosyber wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 22:13
Just_a_fan wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 21:11

In 2010, 2011 and 2012, the McLaren was driven by two world champions. The only team with two world champions in it and the only team that didn't favour one driver over another. Unlike Red Bull and Ferrari.

In 2010, the McLaren drivers had 2 wins to Button, 3 to Hamilton. In 3 of those races they finished 1-2. Alonso had 5 wins on his own, of course, but then he had a tame team mate - "Fernando is faster than you" - who wasn't really on his level anyway.

In 2011, Vettel was dominant and took all of the team's wins. The McLaren drivers took 3 each, Alonso only one. Webber didn't get a win. 2011 was Hamilton's worst season. But even Button, who finished 2nd in the title race was over 120 points behind Vettel. So really this season wasn't anyone other than Vettel's.

in 2012, Hamilton was taken out of three races by reliability and Hulkenberg when leading. He still took 4 wins to Button's 3. Give him back those three wins and Hamilton would have been champion that season. So I'd say that means he was competitive as a driver. He also had the same number of retirements as the rest of the top five put together. 10 retirements in the top 5 and he had 5 of them.

Vettel definitely had the best car in those years. That's fine - he got the car and he did the job and took the titles. That's what being a racing driver is all about.

But the point still remains that only Hamilton had a world champion as a team mate and had an even-handed team. Neither Vettel nor Alonso had that to deal with. So, no, Vettel didn't face more rivals.

In the period of 2010-2012, Hamilton had 11 retirements, Vettel had 5, Webber 5, Button 6 and Alonso 4. So Hamilton had much worse reliability than Vettel (or any of the others). So the argument about equal unreliability doesn't wash either.

In 2013, the Mercedes was not a championship capable car - it just wasn't. The Red Bull was head and shoulders above anything else - Vettel won 9 races on the bounce whilst his "not bad for a number 2" team mate failed to win a single race all season.
Good post, thanks for taking the trouble to give that context, which I didn't want to take the time/energy to do. Vettel surely had a great 4 years and making it as if Hamilton could and should have won but failed all on his own, that's just revisionist.
My point is not Hamilton failed on his own. The title of this forum is comparing Vettel's 4 to Hamilton's 6. I am arguing Hamilton's 6 were won in less competitive environments than Vettel's 4.
Vettel's 4 were competitive BECAUSE Vettel made so many mistakes, which is exactly why he lost in 09, 17 and 18.

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

AMG.Tzan wrote:
21 Dec 2020, 03:10
Some people keep saying that Russell's performance in the Mercedes just showed that Hamilton isn't doing anything special...

Well, what if Russell is a special driver after all? Just like when Lewis got in a Mclaren for the first time as a rookie and beat Fernando over a season (who the article above claims is the 3rd best driver in history :oops:). The thing that we should focus on is that Russell beat Bottas! That means a lot for a guy without any practice in a new car!

Same thing would have happened if you would have put Raikkonen or Alonso in an F2004 in Schumacher's seat! Both would have easily won the race and beat Barrichello in the process! So what? Does that mean that Schumacher wasn't anything special?? I don't think so...

The thing is that when you're trying to find the "best driver" and not the "fastest driver" ever, it's not just all about speed! Hamilton has evolved so much over the years...he used to be one the worst drivers on his tires yet now he has become one of the best in that job!

To be the "best driver" you have to be on top of your game year after year and race after race! Look at Bottas...had Verstappen got a bit more luck he would have finished ahead of him in the WDC! Yet Bottas had a car that was miles ahead of anyone!

So yes Russell did manage to do what Hamilton does in a Mercedes...for a few laps! Can he do the same for a whole season? For 5 or even 10 seasons? Who knows...we'll learn in a few years' time!
He did do as well as Lewis either, because at no point should Bottas be closing in on him if he was driving like Hamilton.
For Sure!!

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

grubschumi13 wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 23:40

Another thing tht points to my idea that Hamilton does not thrive in competitive environments or competitive eras is All team mates that could challenge Hamilton, he had failings out with. Alonso and Rosberg. All the team mates he likes are all push overs Kovalianen and Bottas
What kind of narrative are you pushing here?

He destroyed all of his teammates satisfactorily.
Alonso, matched and beaten. 2x WDC in his prime beaten by a rookie who had a punctured tyre in China, and a very suspicious gear box glitch in Brasil ( i suspect the FIA are responsible for this interference).
Button, Beaten handily by Hamilton. Hardly was ever ahead on track, only by luck or his side of the garage efforts and whitmarsh, to scrape through a year where Hamilton was more focused on beating vettel at all costs more than he was beating Button; who to him was not a challenge.
Rosberg- People forget that Rosberg was beaten handily for three years in a row in his own team. He got beat by the new guy who wasn't even comfortable on the brakes in 2013. Then 2014, he was outclassed in race pace. Hamilton's fuel saving data was used to coach Nico. Then 2015 more of the same, but Hamilton understood the tyres and fuel saving and MGU even more, and his data was still used to coach Nico. But then Nico was still outclassed on race day. Let's not forget these 3 years that Nico suffered at the hands of Lewis. By no means was Nico even close on race day.
Mercedes felt it was time that after 6 years of loyalty that Nico championship should be manufactured (and i am still waiting on Lewis' book to learn more about what really happened at both mclaren and mercedes when teamprincipals were dabbling in the results).. they gave him all the support and even Lewis' mechanics... and still it had to take reliability failures for Nico to win by just 5 points.
Alonso was Hamilton's most competitive teammate. And this was a rookie vs the man that beat Shumacher twice who was in his prime.
Rosberg was very manageable by lewis, and Lewis could drive Rosberg's car by looking in the mirrors, as we have seen when he manages his pace and pushed Nico back into his rivals. I would't necessarily call him much of a challenge if Lewis could control Nico's car to the extent of feeding him into the others. He lost 3-1 then left. Button lost 2-1. Alonso lost on count back.
For Sure!!

grubschumi13
grubschumi13
1
Joined: 06 Jul 2020, 17:34

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

ringo wrote:
23 Dec 2020, 21:30
grubschumi13 wrote:
22 Dec 2020, 23:40

Another thing tht points to my idea that Hamilton does not thrive in competitive environments or competitive eras is All team mates that could challenge Hamilton, he had failings out with. Alonso and Rosberg. All the team mates he likes are all push overs Kovalianen and Bottas
What kind of narrative are you pushing here?

He destroyed all of his teammates satisfactorily.
Alonso, matched and beaten. 2x WDC in his prime beaten by a rookie who had a punctured tyre in China, and a very suspicious gear box glitch in Brasil ( i suspect the FIA are responsible for this interference).
Button, Beaten handily by Hamilton. Hardly was ever ahead on track, only by luck or his side of the garage efforts and whitmarsh, to scrape through a year where Hamilton was more focused on beating vettel at all costs more than he was beating Button; who to him was not a challenge.
Rosberg- People forget that Rosberg was beaten handily for three years in a row in his own team. He got beat by the new guy who wasn't even comfortable on the brakes in 2013. Then 2014, he was outclassed in race pace. Hamilton's fuel saving data was used to coach Nico. Then 2015 more of the same, but Hamilton understood the tyres and fuel saving and MGU even more, and his data was still used to coach Nico. But then Nico was still outclassed on race day. Let's not forget these 3 years that Nico suffered at the hands of Lewis. By no means was Nico even close on race day.
Mercedes felt it was time that after 6 years of loyalty that Nico championship should be manufactured (and i am still waiting on Lewis' book to learn more about what really happened at both mclaren and mercedes when teamprincipals were dabbling in the results).. they gave him all the support and even Lewis' mechanics... and still it had to take reliability failures for Nico to win by just 5 points.
Alonso was Hamilton's most competitive teammate. And this was a rookie vs the man that beat Shumacher twice who was in his prime.
Rosberg was very manageable by lewis, and Lewis could drive Rosberg's car by looking in the mirrors, as we have seen when he manages his pace and pushed Nico back into his rivals. I would't necessarily call him much of a challenge if Lewis could control Nico's car to the extent of feeding him into the others. He lost 3-1 then left. Button lost 2-1. Alonso lost on count back.
Rosberg took Lewis to the wire in 2014. Singapore they were Ham-1 Ros 2 on the grid Rosberg was 20+ points ahed in the championship when Ros Mercedes suffered from a "Foreign Substance" meaning he retired nobody cried foul like Ham fans did during Malaysia 2016. 1 season Rosberg beat Ham. So to say he managed Rosberg is an overstatement.

Button beat Ham in one of their seasons together. Over 3 seasons together Button contributed more points for Mclaren then Ham did.

Ham and Alonso finished level on points so to say destroyed Alonso is just exaggeration.

Thank you for your contribution but you sir just tell lies.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Vettel's 4 vs Hamilton's 6.

Post

grubschumi13 wrote:
24 Dec 2020, 01:36

Rosberg took Lewis to the wire in 2014. Singapore they were Ham-1 Ros 2 on the grid Rosberg was 20+ points ahed in the championship when Ros Mercedes suffered from a "Foreign Substance" meaning he retired nobody cried foul like Ham fans did during Malaysia 2016. 1 season Rosberg beat Ham. So to say he managed Rosberg is an overstatement.

Button beat Ham in one of their seasons together. Over 3 seasons together Button contributed more points for Mclaren then Ham did.

Ham and Alonso finished level on points so to say destroyed Alonso is just exaggeration.

Thank you for your contribution but you sir just tell lies.
2014 - Hamilton 11 wins 384 pts, Rosberg 5 wins 317pts. That's "taking to the wire" is it?

Rosberg won one season out of four. That shows that they were allowed to compete. Unlike various German drivers of high repute. When Schumacher faced Rosberg, he lost 3-0. That's a simple fact. Sure, you can argue age etc., but if you're going to use your arguments against Hamilton then the same applies to others. Rosberg blew Schumacher out of the water.

Button beat Hamilton on points over a number of season? Strange, I thought the points were reset to zero at the start of each year. In 3 seasons, Hamilton 2, Button 1. That's what the record books show. If you want to use points over a number of seasons, Hamilton has 3778 points, which is way more than any other driver in history. Yay, he's the greatest!

Hamilton beat Alonso because he finished second in the championship to Alonso's third. That's how it works. Oh, and Alonso was a two time title winner and Hamilton a rookie. So that'll be "win" to Hamilton.

So, rather than make stuff up to show that Hamilton is bad, just say "I don't like Hamilton". It's ok, you're allowed to not like him. No one minds. But don't make up rubbish to try to show him to be rubbish. You just look silly.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.