Rule Interpretation - Double deck diffusers

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
Shaddock
0
Joined: 07 Nov 2006, 14:39
Location: UK

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

The rear diffuser could make a big difference. Last year it was producing ~50% of the cars overall downforce virtually drag free. Over time all the diffusers were pretty much the same in design, so no advantage was had by anyone team. Now, it's all up for grabs and it could play an important role.

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

Update on the RB5 Diffuser:

Image
Image

All i need to find is a decent BMW Sauber one. Whitch is at the moment hard to find.

Scotracer
Scotracer
3
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 17:09
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

ESP:
Image

Best I could find :)
Powertrain Cooling Engineer

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

Scotracer wrote:ESP:
Image

Best I could find :)
Thats the one im using, but really high res from the BMW Motorsport press web site, 3500x2260 is the resolution of the pic i have that im using. May get a couple of better pics from the Bahrain test.

Heres what i have:

Image
Image

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

Red Bull is losing out on using the outer edges of the diffuser outside the rear wing end plates... I think they should have extended the diffuser the maximum legth and allow the rear wing end plates to effect the parts of the diffuser that fall within it... but then again I am no Newey of aerodynamics.

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

I've gone through this entire thread and I've noticed that the diffuser on the FW31 is the only one with the outside edges at an angle. :idea:

Image

The rest of the cars have either perfectly square or rounded corners, but with perfectly vertical end plates. I don't think this was mentioned before, and with this quick scan through the thread I paid very little attention to the words, so I hope I'm not repeating old news...
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

FIF1 VJM-02 Diffuser:

Image
Image

Ferarri F60 #2 Diffuser:

Image
Image

Ferarri F60 #1 Diffuser:

Image
Image

Scotracer
Scotracer
3
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 17:09
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

Imperium, I've got a better BMW pic for you...

Image
Powertrain Cooling Engineer

tomazy
tomazy
208
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 13:01

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

williams has a new difuzor, look

Image

axle
axle
3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 14:45
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

If that's all the area that Red Bull are missing no wonder they went their way.

I expect an RB/Williams hybrid to become the standard.
- Axle

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

Williams FW31:

Image
Image

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

I like how the RB5 uses the endplates to create what is effectively a double decker diffusor.

Why does williams diffusor seem so much higher off the ground than the other teams?(angle of pic maybe?) or does it have to do with how they exploit the crash structure to extend the diffusor higher?

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

ISLAMATRON wrote:Why does williams diffusor seem so much higher off the ground than the other teams?(angle of pic maybe?) or does it have to do with how they exploit the crash structure to extend the diffusor higher?
I think it's the angle of the pic - it's taken from really low down, close to the ground. Most of the other shots are from higher angles.

Henning
Henning
0
Joined: 17 Oct 2007, 15:02
Location: Kent, England

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post

Williams seems to have extended their wing endplates down to meet the diffuser like RB5.

Also, a nice view of the 3rd damper in that image of the Williams.

imightbewrong
imightbewrong
17
Joined: 07 Aug 2008, 16:18

Re: 2009 Difusser Rule Interpretation

Post