
EDIT: And Hamiltons plank is also too worn. Ferrari disasterclass.
Refueling strategies eventually converge and they are super predictable after that point, especially with one tire supplier in place.CrazyCarperF1 wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 12:34I wish they could find a super safe way to bring back refuelling, strategies need a shakeup.
Toto agrees with me
Nope, don’t own Pirelli stock.Artur Craft wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 05:34Ok, let's talk about having an axe to grind and also about bad reading comprehension.
Regardless of what is demanded from Pirelli, if they made their tyres more durable ,more stable and less affected by thermal degradation, it would be much slower than what it already is ( other than weight, everything in the current regulation_ like big downforce, wide slick tyres, DRS, more Power and torque and etc..._ favours today's car. Yet, despite a new surface, they barely went faster than the race lap record done over 20 years ago with Bridgestone and I can assure you the Japanese manufacturer produces way better tyres today, 2 decades later. )
You seem to be a shareholder of Pirelli or something, which is good, I hope you keep making money with it. I just cannot let you say tyres were different even for team mates, during the tyre war period. They literally had a draw to ensure every driver got the very same tyre from their respective supplier.
2 mandatory stop would be enough, using all 3 compounds.CrazyCarperF1 wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 12:34I wish they could find a super safe way to bring back refuelling, strategies need a shakeup.
Drunk on haterade without realizing he had floor damage.Artur Craft wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 13:35I´m starting to feel sorry for Antonelli. When it was announced him as the DOTD, the commentators on my local tv started to mock him.
Toto made a big mistake bringing him up right now, he wasn´t even ready for GP2 (was a midfielder there the whole year while driving for Prema)
Refuelling was racing cancer in F1. After a couple of years the teams used fuel stops to keep the cars apart on track. As a viewer you had no idea what was going on, no one outside the teams was aware of how much fuel was onboard each car. Even the teams felt it was a boring way to go racing.bauc wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 12:46Refueling strategies eventually converge and they are super predictable after that point, especially with one tire supplier in place.CrazyCarperF1 wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 12:34I wish they could find a super safe way to bring back refuelling, strategies need a shakeup.
I think this is the point, pitting takes to long. I do not think they rise the pit speed limit, but I like the point on track rework.Mogster wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 15:00Refuelling was racing cancer in F1. After a couple of years the teams used fuel stops to keep the cars apart on track. As a viewer you had no idea what was going on, no one outside the teams was aware of how much fuel was onboard each car. Even the teams felt it was a boring way to go racing.bauc wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 12:46Refueling strategies eventually converge and they are super predictable after that point, especially with one tire supplier in place.CrazyCarperF1 wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 12:34I wish they could find a super safe way to bring back refuelling, strategies need a shakeup.
I do fell pit stops take too long and restrict strategy too much. Increasing the pit lane speed limit seems unlikely, although I don’t see it being a problem at circuits with wide pit lanes. New circuits could be designed so the pit lane exit formed a short cut, maybe some existing ones could be modified. That way you could reduce the pit delta to 10 seconds or so. That would enable more strategies and stop the leaders driving slowly in worn tyres as we saw today.