Yeah. Heard they're now running a taxi service with it.
You are always ready to to talk Max down (and sure Lewis will get pole here, don’t you worry) but did you then also see that in FP2 max’ Final quick lap on the Supersoft was within a tenth of a second of Lewis fastest time (fastest of FP2 at that time) which was also set on the supersoft. I think you noticed, you keep an eagle eye out.
O please take your perceived issues some place else.Sieper wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 22:07You are always ready to to talk Max down (and sure Lewis will get pole here, don’t you worry) but did you then also see that in FP2 max’ Final quick lap on the Supersoft was within a tenth of a second of Lewis fastest time (fastest of FP2 at that time) which was also set on the supersoft. I think you noticed, you keep an eagle eye out.
13:18 Very quick from Hamilton - he does a 1m13.347s, which is a full 1.035s ahead of Raikkonen's previous benchmark.
13:20 Max Verstappen splits the Mercedes to go second on supersofts, but he's still 0.365s behind Hamilton - who's on an even better lap.
That’ll do nicely... Lewis hammers in a hot one to go P1 with a 1:13.347! Valtteri slots into P2. Worth the wait!
All times reported after that are hypersofts, they don't even mention another run by max.13:21 Hamilton finds three tenths to go faster still with a 1m13.031s. Bottas improves at the same time to reclaim second, but it's still 0.5s off Hamilton.
Vettel was whoring a slipstream behind toro rosso on one of his quali runsatanatizante wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 21:57Vettel 10km/h more than Kimi (maybe a tow, different RW downforce levels or engine mode) but also Leclerc did 333km/h ...
https://s33.postimg.cc/4hgop28xb/2018-0 ... n_View.jpg
Watch FP2 when you get home, I did the same. I hoped for a response like, that is indeed true, so If we can say anything based on fp they still are very close. Ricci later (when RB finally got his car running) was 0,7 seconds of the earlier pace by ham and Max on supersoft (on his own last supersoft lap) and on hypers 0,4.dans79 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 22:17O please take your perceived issues some place else.Sieper wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 22:07You are always ready to to talk Max down (and sure Lewis will get pole here, don’t you worry) but did you then also see that in FP2 max’ Final quick lap on the Supersoft was within a tenth of a second of Lewis fastest time (fastest of FP2 at that time) which was also set on the supersoft. I think you noticed, you keep an eagle eye out.
I'm at work, its currently 3:13 PM in my timezone, so i can only follow what autosptort streams.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/live/27842 ... ctice-2018
13:18 Very quick from Hamilton - he does a 1m13.347s, which is a full 1.035s ahead of Raikkonen's previous benchmark.13:20 Max Verstappen splits the Mercedes to go second on supersofts, but he's still 0.365s behind Hamilton - who's on an even better lap.That’ll do nicely... Lewis hammers in a hot one to go P1 with a 1:13.347! Valtteri slots into P2. Worth the wait!All times reported after that are hypersofts, they don't even mention another run by max.13:21 Hamilton finds three tenths to go faster still with a 1m13.031s. Bottas improves at the same time to reclaim second, but it's still 0.5s off Hamilton.
why are you attacking Dan he's literally just been stating facts.Sieper wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 22:55Watch FP2 when you get home, I did the same. I hoped for a response like, that is indeed true, so If we can say anything based on fp they still are very close. Ricci later (when RB finally got his car running) was 0,7 seconds of the earlier pace by ham and Max on supersoft (on his own last supersoft lap) and on hypers 0,4.dans79 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 22:17O please take your perceived issues some place else.Sieper wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 22:07You are always ready to to talk Max down (and sure Lewis will get pole here, don’t you worry) but did you then also see that in FP2 max’ Final quick lap on the Supersoft was within a tenth of a second of Lewis fastest time (fastest of FP2 at that time) which was also set on the supersoft. I think you noticed, you keep an eagle eye out.
I'm at work, its currently 3:13 PM in my timezone, so i can only follow what autosptort streams.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/live/27842 ... ctice-2018
13:18 Very quick from Hamilton - he does a 1m13.347s, which is a full 1.035s ahead of Raikkonen's previous benchmark.13:20 Max Verstappen splits the Mercedes to go second on supersofts, but he's still 0.365s behind Hamilton - who's on an even better lap.That’ll do nicely... Lewis hammers in a hot one to go P1 with a 1:13.347! Valtteri slots into P2. Worth the wait!All times reported after that are hypersofts, they don't even mention another run by max.13:21 Hamilton finds three tenths to go faster still with a 1m13.031s. Bottas improves at the same time to reclaim second, but it's still 0.5s off Hamilton.
When you want to highlight every minute detail (and why not, it is what we do here) you have to look at everything, not only the facts that suit you.
As do I. I was wondering why immediately the fact who was faster needed to get put in perspective, whilst in FP2 Max and Lewis where still very close (but now on the same tire) got no mention at all. Dan has already answered he had not seen FP2 yet so I am sure he can answer himself when he gets the chance to.SiLo wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 23:13why are you attacking Dan he's literally just been stating facts.Sieper wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 22:55Watch FP2 when you get home, I did the same. I hoped for a response like, that is indeed true, so If we can say anything based on fp they still are very close. Ricci later (when RB finally got his car running) was 0,7 seconds of the earlier pace by ham and Max on supersoft (on his own last supersoft lap) and on hypers 0,4.dans79 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 22:17
O please take your perceived issues some place else.
I'm at work, its currently 3:13 PM in my timezone, so i can only follow what autosptort streams.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/live/27842 ... ctice-2018
All times reported after that are hypersofts, they don't even mention another run by max.
When you want to highlight every minute detail (and why not, it is what we do here) you have to look at everything, not only the facts that suit you.