McLaren 2015 livery

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
ScottB
ScottB
4
Joined: 17 Mar 2012, 14:45

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

Somewhat relevant for those hoping for a Marlboro tribute effort:

http://usvsth3m.com/post/a-transformers ... cigarettes

Given Mclaren's push into cartoons, toys and other merchandise, that's potentially quite the barrier to them going ahead. Of course it could be argued that the current car is a cigarette company inspired livery, but as it's not in the popular consciousness to the degree of the Marlboro one they'll presumably be alright...

Phillyred
Phillyred
3
Joined: 08 Apr 2010, 18:46

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

I figured it was something to do with that or some sort of "copyright infringement" since the color scheme would suggest Marlboro sponsorship etc.

acosmichippo
acosmichippo
8
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 03:51
Location: Washington DC

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

The Marlboro issue is not just the colors. There are probably millions of red and white toy cars around the world NOT associated at all with Marlboro. It's the colors in addition to the chevron shape that gives the association with Marlboro. See Ferrari's team logo below. The problem with a white and red livery is not that it would associate them with Marlboro - it's that it would not stand apart from Ferrari's Red and white enough for brand differentiation.

Image

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

They can easily use the Retr0 colours without using the Marlboro Chevron shapes, still look great and please the fans. eg

Red, White & Black are Honda colours too!

Image
"In downforce we trust"

acosmichippo
acosmichippo
8
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 03:51
Location: Washington DC

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

And it looks like a Ferrari B-team.

User avatar
scuderiafan
11
Joined: 06 Nov 2010, 15:14
Location: United States

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

Ultimately they'll go with whatever sponsors want on it. I'd rather see them enter a new era of livery than go back to one they've already done. Purple maybe?
"You're so angry that you throw your gloves down, and the worst part is; you have to pick them up again." - Steve Matchett

Patiently waiting...

Manoah2u
Manoah2u
61
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 14:07

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

acosmichippo wrote:And it looks like a Ferrari B-team.
it totally does not
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

Manoah2u wrote: it totally does not
Looks like he got down voted for that stupid comment too! :D
"In downforce we trust"

feni_remmen
feni_remmen
3
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 15:43

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

scuderiafan wrote:Ultimately they'll go with whatever sponsors want on it. I'd rather see them enter a new era of livery than go back to one they've already done. Purple maybe?
Part of the problem will be that McLaren are simply unwilling to bend to sponsor desires. We already know Ron won't give discounts on sponsorship. We also know that Mr Dennis values the McLaren brand rather highly and won't comprimise easily on which companies get to join with McLaren. Rather than McLaren going with what the sponsors want, it might be the other way around.

ScottB
ScottB
4
Joined: 17 Mar 2012, 14:45

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

feni_remmen wrote:
scuderiafan wrote:Ultimately they'll go with whatever sponsors want on it. I'd rather see them enter a new era of livery than go back to one they've already done. Purple maybe?
Part of the problem will be that McLaren are simply unwilling to bend to sponsor desires. We already know Ron won't give discounts on sponsorship. We also know that Mr Dennis values the McLaren brand rather highly and won't comprimise easily on which companies get to join with McLaren. Rather than McLaren going with what the sponsors want, it might be the other way around.
All the more reason to establish a base 'Mclaren look' for new sponsors to fit into.

No sponsor would expect Ferrari to move away from red, I doubt any sponsor would expect to get Mercedes away from silver either, and that's the sort of image Mclaren need as they move into that sort of market and required image off the track, be it the current one, red and white, orange etc. then new sponsors fit in with that look.

Changing the whole look of the car for a title sponsor seems to be becoming less common, unless they were offering a shed load of cash, or that the livery had good PR / nostalgia value (Williams / Martini), I don't think Mclaren should move away from establishing their own, unique image.

xDama
xDama
2
Joined: 10 Jun 2009, 16:51

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

ScottB wrote:Changing the whole look of the car for a title sponsor seems to be becoming less common, unless they were offering a shed load of cash, or that the livery had good PR / nostalgia value (Williams / Martini), I don't think Mclaren should move away from establishing their own, unique image.
Eh? The look of a car always changes according to the sponsorship. Every car on the current grid has a livery, in function of their sponsorship and their title sponsors. The only 2 teams with their 'own unique' image are Red Bull and Ferrari. And even their liveries change, according to sponsorship.

Red Bull - Blue/Red
Infiniti - Purple
Martini - White
Marlboro - Red/white
Santander - Red/white
Petronas - Green
Mercedes - Silver
Banco do Brasil - Blue/Yellow
"I race to win, and if you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing driver." - Ayrton Senna

ScottB
ScottB
4
Joined: 17 Mar 2012, 14:45

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

xDama wrote:
ScottB wrote:Changing the whole look of the car for a title sponsor seems to be becoming less common, unless they were offering a shed load of cash, or that the livery had good PR / nostalgia value (Williams / Martini), I don't think Mclaren should move away from establishing their own, unique image.
Eh? The look of a car always changes according to the sponsorship. Every car on the current grid has a livery, in function of their sponsorship and their title sponsors. The only 2 teams with their 'own unique' image are Red Bull and Ferrari. And even their liveries change, according to sponsorship.

Red Bull - Blue/Red
Infiniti - Purple
Martini - White
Marlboro - Red/white
Santander - Red/white
Petronas - Green
Mercedes - Silver
Banco do Brasil - Blue/Yellow
In the last few years, Sauber have changed for Banco do Brasil, and Williams have changed for Martini. Who else?

Red Bull kept their basic colourscheme when adding Infiniti.
Mercedes are silver, despite Petronas being green (yes there are green flashes, but still).
Ferrari will always be red regardless of who sponsors it.
Lotus have stuck with their black and gold.
Force India's colours don't seem related to any of their sponsors specifically, new or otherwise.
Marussia and Caterham had consistent colourschemes during their time.
Mclaren stuck with their chrome after splitting with Mercedes.

As I say, I can't think of any significant livery change due to a title sponsor in recent years besides Williams and Sauber. The latter of which had basically kept their BMW colours for years after that split.

feni_remmen
feni_remmen
3
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 15:43

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

ScottB wrote:
feni_remmen wrote:
scuderiafan wrote:Ultimately they'll go with whatever sponsors want on it. I'd rather see them enter a new era of livery than go back to one they've already done. Purple maybe?
Part of the problem will be that McLaren are simply unwilling to bend to sponsor desires. We already know Ron won't give discounts on sponsorship. We also know that Mr Dennis values the McLaren brand rather highly and won't comprimise easily on which companies get to join with McLaren. Rather than McLaren going with what the sponsors want, it might be the other way around.
All the more reason to establish a base 'Mclaren look' for new sponsors to fit into.

No sponsor would expect Ferrari to move away from red, I doubt any sponsor would expect to get Mercedes away from silver either, and that's the sort of image Mclaren need as they move into that sort of market and required image off the track, be it the current one, red and white, orange etc. then new sponsors fit in with that look.

Changing the whole look of the car for a title sponsor seems to be becoming less common, unless they were offering a shed load of cash, or that the livery had good PR / nostalgia value (Williams / Martini), I don't think Mclaren should move away from establishing their own, unique image.
I said it a page back. McLaren told the world that "West" would be fitting into the new McLaren look back in 97 when they first took them on. Silver/black/red. That is McLaren!

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

They were already a Mercedes team when west joined.... In fact Mercedes part owned McLaren until very recently!
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
Xero
32
Joined: 28 Jan 2014, 15:11
Location: Moray, Scotland

Re: McLaren Livery

Post

Silver is as much a McLaren colour as it is Mercedes IMO. And although I was disappointed with the new livery at first, after watching the first test I'm actually starting to really like it! It looks pretty bad-ass! Adding a sponsor to the sidepod will just complete it, whether they find a title sponsor, or cycle their partners as they did last year.