wiktor977 wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 14:53
Cs98 wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 14:02
wiktor977 wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 13:53
This whole debate about underbite/overbite, looks like "push vs pull" debate. Both solutions have pros and cons. But fundamentally it all depends on what the team wants to achieve in terms of airflow management. Did Mercedes made a mistake scrapping overbite idea based on what Red Bull is doing now? I would say no.
The suspension debate has had a clear convergence towards push-rod rear and either one front. This is much more intriguing because you had the dominant car of all time incrementally developing towards more underbite, only for its successor to flip the script. Meanwhile you have everyone else (except McL) going towards underbite or removing their overbite (Merc). The emperor has swapped clothes with the peasants
I don't agree with you on the push-rod, but that is not the point. Yes, it's intriguing that Red Bull changed the approach, does it mean that every other team with underbite is wrong? Hell nah.
This all reminds me of the late 90s to early 2000s.
First you had to have a highnose, then you had to take it down again because of McLaren, after Ferrari became champion in 2000, even McLaren raised it, only to find that the Italians wore it down again in 2001...
At some point later, all teams had them somewhere around the middle.