Robert Kubica is leaving winter testing downbeat, having seen his schedule on Friday being cut short by excessive wear on car parts for which the team did not have spares.
Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
Albon with a very consistent run on C2
OUT
23.874
23.769
23.842
23.669
23.888
23.973
23.596
23.625
23.515
23.482
23.424
23.335
23.636
23.735
23.681
23.586
23.767
23.749
23.815
23.477
23.555
23.670
23.977
23.802
IN
from @f1debrief
It looks like they are testing different tire management strategies.
The first two are very similar, cool down, fast laps to heat up, then pace, pace, pace, let it coll of, try to attack, let it cool of, pace pace... The third, is bit different on the begininig.
Art without engineering is dreaming. Engineering without art is calculating.Steven K. Roberts
Looking at today's times, one should hope that Ferrari is running full race load and Mercedes is running with two stint load. Every 5kg of fuel is worth 2 tenths (based on Allison's statement on the reason they choose not to run 110kg fuel load). Ferrari is adrift by 2 seconds on each of those stints should mean, they are carrying 50kg more fuel than Mercedes OR running more conservative power modes than Mercedes for equal load.
Here is yesterday's stint. Shows similar differences, but Hamilton on C2 and Vettel on C3.
HAMILTON
STINT 1 (C2)
1: 26.296
1: 20.135
1: 23.649
1: 20.856
1: 20.993
1: 35.435
1: 20.761
1: 20.625
1: 20.977
1: 21.370
1: 22.360
1: 22.134
1: 24.235
Albon with a very consistent run on C2
OUT
23.874
23.769
23.842
23.669
23.888
23.973
23.596
23.625
23.515
23.482
23.424
23.335
23.636
23.735
23.681
23.586
23.767
23.749
23.815
23.477
23.555
23.670
23.977
23.802
IN
from @f1debrief
promising
I've read some analysis here that says Mercedes and redbull went different way from Ferrari and if mercedes and redbull's ways are wrong it is hard for them to turn Ferrari's way. I think there is a problem with that. What is it ? For me; it is Toro Rosso which uses Redbull's ex chassis' rear part. Maybe Redbull were aware of both style and wanted to try both. Redbull's rear part looks like same as last year's redbull, just more thight.
HAMILTON
STINT 1 (C3)
1: 27.708 - cool down
1: 20.299 - pace
1: 20.822 - pace
1: 21.133 - pace
1: 21.361 - pace
1: 21.973 - pace
1: 21.963 - pace
1: 23.788 - management pace
1: 23.853 - management pace
1: 23.879 - management pace
1: 24.088 - management pace
1: 24.486 - management pace
STINT 2 (C3)
1: 20.480 - heat up
1: 21.285 - pace
1: 21.167 - pace
1: 21.314 - pace
1: 21.218 - pace
1: 27.342 - cool down
1: 22.487 - management pace
1: 23.524 - management pace
1: 23.577 - management pace
1: 24.156 - management pace
1: 24.170 - management pace
STINT 3 (C3)
1: 20.107 - heat up
1: 21.003 - pace
1: 21.558 - pace
1: 21.575 - pace
1: 22.140 - management pace
1: 22.952 - management pace
1: 23.499 - management pace
1: 24.802 - management pace
BOTTAS
STINT 1 (C3)
1: 30.729 - cool down
1: 19. 947 - heat up
1: 42.013 - cool down
1: 21.848 - pace
1: 21.422 - pace
1: 21.232 - pace
1: 21.329 - pace
1: 21.556 - pace
1: 21.226 - pace
1: 22.199 - management pace
1: 22.828 - management pace
1: 24.599 - management pace (my be cool down)
1: 22.726 - management pace
STINT 2 (C3)
1: 33.824 - cool down
1: 20.204 - heat up
1: 51.535 - cool down
1: 21.590 - pace
1: 21.435 - pace
1: 21.579 - pace
1: 46.930 - cool down
1: 21.966 - pace
1: 21.733 - pace
1: 21.468 - pace
1: 22.229 - management pace
1: 22.386 - management pace
1: 22.636 - management pace
1: 23.117 - management pace
1: 23.087 - management pace
STINT 3 (C3)
1: 31.425 - cool down
1: 44.374 - cool down
1: 20.306 - heat up
1: 40.884 - cool down
1: 20.840 - heat up
1: 21.281 - pace
1: 21.240 - pace
1: 21.387 - pace
1: 21.792 - pace
1: 22.143 - management pace
1: 22.652 - management pace
1: 22.958 - management pace
1: 23.264 - management pace
STINT 4 (C3)
1: 27.405 - cool down
1: 19.616 - heat up
1: 21.292 - pace
1: 21.746 - pace
1: 21.755 - pace
1: 21.462 - pace
1: 22.119 - management pace
1: 22.732 - management pace
1: 23.123 - cool down
1: 22.682 - heat up
1: 23.226 - management pace
1: 23.137 - management pace
1: 23.295 - management pace
1: 23.317 - management pace
STINT 5 (C3)
1: 28.848 - cool down
1: 19.535 - heat up
1: 21.166 - pace
1: 21.240 - pace
1: 21.611 - pace
1: 22.347 - management pace
1: 22.955 - management pace
1: 23.499 - management pace
1: 24.659 - coll down
1: 23.082 - heat up
1: 24.215 - cool down
1: 23.285 - management pace
1: 23.446 - management pace
Just my idea of what are they doing. By "management pace" I mean the pace when they don't need to push and just control the race if they are in front... It's more like different approaches to tire management testing than race simulation.
Art without engineering is dreaming. Engineering without art is calculating.Steven K. Roberts
Were they? As far as i remember, the conclusion was that Ferrari looked fast and that Haas was best of the rest. Turned out to be spot on, once you disregard that Melbourne is anything but a conclusive track.
last year everybody was saying(I guess including you. You just don't remember) that Merc was so much ahead of Ferrari(because of race sims), and Melbourne confirmed that but that was a different story on other tracks.
Were they? As far as i remember, the conclusion was that Ferrari looked fast and that Haas was best of the rest. Turned out to be spot on, once you disregard that Melbourne is anything but a conclusive track.
last year everybody was saying(I guess including you. You just don't remember) that Merc was so much ahead of Ferrari(because of race sims), and Melbourne confirmed that but that was a different story on other tracks.
Ferrari had new floor for bahrain which was a major upgrade.