That's not the thightest packaging from what I saw. Lots of free space between cooling inlets and some devices....Forza wrote:Australian GP - Wednesday - 13/3/2013
http://img4.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Lot ... 669107.jpg
Not only that, but hints at a strong secondary function (discussed earlier in thread) as why would you take the drag but not the gain?Maxion wrote:The ears are closed, so I guess they weren't bluffing when they said they wouldn't run the DRD until later in the season?
The ears are there because they are build into the chassis (rool-hop). They are not remoable like Sauber'sGridlock wrote:Not only that, but hints at a strong secondary function (discussed earlier in thread) as why would you take the drag but not the gain?Maxion wrote:The ears are closed, so I guess they weren't bluffing when they said they wouldn't run the DRD until later in the season?
Or did Disney sign up as title sponsor?
You don't need efficient rear wing at higher speeds on straights.SatchelCharge wrote:Might the ears not make for cleaner air going back to the rear wing? At high speed, when the airbox is "overfilled" and spilling air out to each side.
However, you could do with an efficient rear wing under braking... when the airbox* is hideously overspilling.korzeniow wrote:You don't need efficient rear wing at higher speeds on straights.
And they removed the black thing they placed inside the intake since Barcelona testsForza wrote:Australian GP - Wednesday - 13/3/2013
http://img2.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Lot ... 669106.jpg
http://img4.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Lot ... 669107.jpg
This only reinforces my point, IMO.korzeniow wrote: The ears are there because they are build into the chassis (rool-hop). They are not remoable like Sauber's